Jump to content
Male HQ

SuperSentai

Members
  • Content count

    347
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About SuperSentai

  • Rank
    Senior Member
  • Birthday 06/20/1989

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Choa Chu Kang

Personal Information

  • Height
    172 cm
  • Weight
    70 kg
  • Relationship Status
    Single
  • Role
    Flex Bottom

Recent Profile Visitors

14,769 profile views
  1. Bottoms : Do You Ever Just Want To Be Holes ?

    Tops: Do You Ever Just Want To Be Dildos ?
  2. Wah! Super Sentai fan? 

  3. Those who are fit.

    Muscular people have higher metabolic rates as muscles consume more energy.
  4. He grew up in the USA, so his English is a lot better than his Japanese.
  5. https://9gag.com/gag/aynrgWY/this-is-why-ghost-dont-kill-people-in-real-life-it-would-be-super-awkward
  6. Woman shouted at me

    I experienced the opposite. Wore pink tank top to Pinkdot, then went for Play Pinkball clubbing to Suntec. Took cab home after that, and when I was paying the driver (an Indian man) before I got off, he turned on the lights in the cab, saw my pink tank top, and said (along the lines of),"Oh Pinkdot! I support it! My whole family do! Keep it up!". Haha a very heart-warming end to a long day.
  7. http://www.tt1069.com/bbs/thread-3154362-1-1.html
  8. When considering the meaning behind such slogans, it is important to think of why such slogans exist. "Support the freedom to love" was created in response to the discrimination faced by LGBT, just as "black lives matter" was created in response to the violent discrimination faced by Blacks mainly in USA. "Black lives matter", so "All other human lives don't matter"? "Malay lives don't matter"? "Hispanic lives don't matter"? No, but in the context of violent discrimination of the Blacks, "black lives matter" stand correct. In fact, in African country when Blacks are the majority, "black lives matter" don't even apply. So, it is important not to misunderstand such slogans used to push for reforms. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Lives_Matter#Criticism_of_.22All_Lives_Matter.22
  9. Unfortunately, as of now, the law of any country does not ban unprotected sex between a legally married couple. And the law of any country does not allow marriage between two blood related siblings. Equal rights are written into the law. You can assume many things, but until that law changes, the gay community is just asking for legal equality as the straight community with regards to the present law, nothing more nothing less. Like how Taiwan phrases it, 婚姻平权. And besides, there already exist a form of love between siblings and their family: familial love. "Freedom to love" doesn't just mean romantic love, you know.
  10. Because you can't stop a legally married couple (siblings or otherwise) from having unprotected sex and getting babies from it. It's either legally married or not, regardless of whether they are blood-related, if you want to view all married couples as equals. You can't have one group of legally married couple having more rights than another group of legally married couple. Total equal rights clearly wasn't in his mind when he proposed his argument. This type of people are those who think that one group of human beings is more superior than another group of human beings.
  11. Since most straight siblings out there are fertile and thus can't get married, if we allow infertile straight siblings / gay siblings to get married, it would be inequality to the fertile straight siblings. We are (currently) asking for equality with the (current) straight community norms in terms of marriage rights and recognition. EQUALITY is the issue here, I'll say. At the end of the day, all we want is to raise the social status of LGBT to be on par with the straights.
  12. This is so true. What's being talked about here exists only in the ideal world, but the real world is far more harsh. But then again, Mr Angry should also realise that in the real harsh world, people attractive or not will always be attracted to the more sexually desired; his idea that only the attractive ones should message him on Grindr exists only in the ideal world. Everyone likes pretty things, right? Just as anyone have the right to message him on the apps, he have as much right to ignore those he find unattractive and even more so, rant about it on his own Facebook account. I prefer to rant about it in my heart though. People are already not reading profile introductions on apps, so no point putting the rant on your social media anyway. Welcome to this thread: https://www.blowingwind.io/forum/topic/86887-what-do-u-think-about-chubs-who-look-for-slimfit-guys/
  13. This mentality is exactly why a certain religion dictates that their women be covered from head to toe in public, that the onus is on women to shield themselves from unwanted attention instead of on the opposite sex to exercise self-control and self-awareness, and that a rape victim who dresses sexily deserves to be raped. A peacock displays his gorgeous tail feathers to attract his favored peahen, not just any Tom, Dick or Harry. Your sister who dresses up to go out and meet potential dates do not deserve to approached by lewd unattractive man on her way back home.
  14. One belief I have always held: If you cant be physically attracted to the person you see when you look into a mirror, how can you expect someone, who is so much more sexually desirable (as perceived by general public) than yourself, to be physically attracted to you? One thing I have noted is that people have been badgering him even after being rejected with a no-reply response on Grindr, so these people should also just move on after being rejected. None of us likes to be consistently spammed by the same person after rejecting them.
×
counter