New UK PM

[Guest Orange]

So after years of India under British rule, this week, UK new PM will be an Indian. 

[Guest I know this guy]

2 hours ago, Guest Orange said:

So after years of India under British rule, this week, UK new PM will be an Indian. 

Regardless of his color, he will be a reasonable person.  If he wants to save the British economy, he is more likely to be pro-China than pro-India.  With regard to India's belief that this new PM, who is of Indian descent, will assist widen the doors for more Indian immigrants, the sentiment of the British people won't permit that to happen without taking advantage of further benefits.  Furthermore, what makes you think this chap is not practising caste system even among the indians?

[Guest Guest]

He is born in UK.

 

Quite handsome too.

 

Wonder is he sunat?

[Guest It is me again]

22 minutes ago, Guest Guest said:

He is born in UK.

Quite handsome too.

Nice joke to start the day.

[MarriedBiTop]

I think he is anti-china

[cutejack]

1 hour ago, Guest Guest said:

He is born in UK.

 

Quite handsome too.

 

Wonder is he sunat?

U like sunat kind is it?

[Guest Haha]

Indian got sunat one? 

 

Oddly enough I also have a fascination on Indian cock.

 

Not sure is it because I see them as construction worker / hard labor cock. Or Indian is the Asian version of BBC. 

 

Find alot or Indian worker very good looking. Their built. Their face jawline etc. Especially those in construction, a few I oggle is like model look. 

 

Sigh. 

 

Also they have that nice tan. Envious 

[Guest RSunak]

58 minutes ago, Guest Haha said:

Indian got sunat one? 

 

Oddly enough I also have a fascination on Indian cock.

 

Not sure is it because I see them as construction worker / hard labor cock. Or Indian is the Asian version of BBC. 

 

Find alot or Indian worker very good looking. Their built. Their face jawline etc. Especially those in construction, a few I oggle is like model look. 

 

Sigh. 

 

Also they have that nice tan. Envious 

i think indians mostly not sunat.

british are mostly not sunat too. they have big fat uncut cocks like their european brothers. 
so yea, he’s probably not sunat.

[sgmaven]

At least he is a practical guy. Back when he was contesting for the Tory Leadership against Liz Truss, he refused to cut taxes, knowing that it would be fiscally irresponsible.

[Guest Common]

9 hours ago, MarriedBiTop said:

I think he is anti-china

Anti-China to win white supermacist votes.  After winning election, he will put economy before his voters and work with China whole-heartedly.  Otherwise, he will not be able to bring economy result to the table, post BREXIT and risk being voted out soon. 

[Guest Not the Same]

6 hours ago, Guest Haha said:

Not sure is it because I see them as construction worker / hard labor cock. Or Indian is the Asian version of BBC. 

 

Find alot or Indian worker very good looking. Their built. Their face jawline etc. Especially those in construction, a few I oggle is like model look. 

 

 

They are not Indian, they are Bangaladeshi.   Indian don't like to work hard, they prefer office jobs.  Bangala only wanted to work - anything also can.

[MarriedBiTop]

9 minutes ago, Guest Common said:

Anti-China to win white supermacist votes.  After winning election, he will put economy before his voters and work with China whole-heartedly.  Otherwise, he will not be able to bring economy result to the table, post BREXIT and risk being voted out soon. 

 

 

You think so?

 

In Mar this yr   he said he would close all the Chinese Confucius  institution in UK..and go all out to fight china

[Guest Aiya]

你们这些小流氓 ， 

 

心里面想的都是一些西方人会认为是种族歧视与藐视的思想与言论。

 

天竺人的后裔已经登上英国黄金宝座， 呼风唤雨 啦

 

醒醒吧。

 

 

[yhtang]

13 hours ago, Guest Guest said:

He is born in UK.

 

Quite handsome too.

 

Wonder is he sunat?

 

In answer to your question, I would think he is intact.  He is Hindu, not Muslim, so there is no obligatory circumcision. 

It is not common for babies to be routinely circumcised in the UK, so the likelihood of a no sunat Sunak would be high.   

[cutejack]

2 hours ago, Guest Not the Same said:

They are not Indian, they are Bangaladeshi.   Indian don't like to work hard, they prefer office jobs.  Bangala only wanted to work - anything also can.

Mostly infact all construction workers are indians. 

Mind yr words indians dont work hard.

Banglas are the one who ask for money for u to suck their cock. They work hard to enter yr asshole n u pay them money.

U know what, banglas are being hatred among Malaysians. Go n see in grindr when u r there.

Get yr facts right before saying something especially about races ok. Doesnt mean u as a non member, u can hide and say anything u like. 

 

[drektster]

firstly i see it that regarless of skin color or cultural group, if the person is fit for the job, he gets the job. he has to put his country benefits before any other matters. he should act against any foreign or local force which will jeopardse the welfare of his countrymen.

[singalion]

 

 

They’re openly saying it: Brexit has failed. But what comes next may be very dark indeed

Jonathan Freedland

 

Fri 19 May 2023

 

The ‘remoaner elite’, the civil service, the BBC, universities, unions, refugees: anything is blamed but Brexit itself

 

 

 

 

It lasts no more than a second, but it is a moment for the ages. Interviewed on BBC Newsnight on Monday, Nigel Farage made a confession that, by rights, should end the debate that has split this country down the middle for much of the last decade. A month ahead of the seventh anniversary of the 2016 vote that took Britain out of the European Union, Farage said three words of striking simplicity and truth: “Brexit has failed.”

 

‘Farage said three words of striking simplicity and truth: “Brexit has failed.”’ Nigel Farage at a press conference in London on 20 March 2023. Photograph: Daniel Leal/AFP/Getty Images

 

You can watch the clip over and over, for it is something to behold. Here is the arch-Brexiter himself, the man who dedicated his life to the cause of rupture from the EU, admitting it has been a disaster. Of course, as we shall see, he and his fellow Brexiters do not blame that failure on the idea itself, but it’s the admission that counts. It offers grounds for modest celebration: now, at last, the contours of an emerging national consensus are visible, as remainers and leavers alike can join in agreement that this thing has not worked. And yet it comes at a price, one that also became darkly visible this week.

 

 

Start with the facts that even Farage can no longer duck. During the referendum campaign, he and his allies promised that Brexit would be a boon for the UK economy, unshackling it from Brussels red tape and releasing it into a roaring future. Seven years on, we can see the reality: a country in the grip of a cost of living crisis that means millions can no longer afford what they once regarded as the basics. Britain is becoming poorer and falling behind its peers. Ours is now forecast to be one of the worst performing economies in the world, not merely seventh in the G7 but 20th in the G20 – behind even a Russia under toughening international sanctions – according to the International Monetary Fund.

 

The consequences of being poorer are seen and felt everywhere, whether it’s in the 3m food parcels delivered by food banks last year, the family who can’t get a mental health appointment for a troubled child, or in courts that are jammed and backlogged for years. For a while, the Brexiters could blame all our woes on anything but Brexit: Covid or Ukraine. But there’s no hiding place now.

 

This week came a warning that post-Brexit trading arrangements with the EU threaten the very existence of the entire UK automotive industry, which employs some 800,000 people. Ford, Jaguar Land Rover and the owners of Vauxhall called on the government to renegotiate the Brexit deal. Such demands are getting louder. Next month, a thousand businesses, alongside representatives of farming and fishing, will gather in Birmingham for the Trade Unlocked conference, called to discuss a post-Brexit landscape most say has made commercial life infinitely harder and more bureaucratic. “Business is beginning to find its voice,” one organiser tells me.

 

But it’s not just the economic numbers. Remember, Farage and the others argued that a hit to GDP would be worth it, so long as Brexit fulfilled its other promises – most cherished among them, a reduction in the number of immigrants to the UK. Yet if you were among those persuaded, against the evidence, to see immigration as a cost, rather than a benefit, to the country, Brexit has failed on even that measure. Immigration has gone up, not down, since we left the EU, with one analysis suggesting net annual migration figures published next week could see a rise to 700,000 or even 1 million. Turns out Britain needs migrants – but now they have to come from far away, rather than in reciprocal movement between us and our nearest neighbours.

 

Given all this, what are the Brexiters to do? Some still deny reality altogether, insisting that we should disbelieve the evidence of our own eyes. The rest admit that Brexit has failed, and then face one of two options. Either they can atone for their role in visiting this calamity upon the nation and move to correct it. Or they can blame others for not doing it right.

 

On Newsnight, Farage made the latter choice. Yes, it was true that Britain had “not actually benefited from Brexit economically” but that was because “useless” politicians had “mismanaged this totally”. It’s the manoeuvre perfected in an earlier era by western communists confronted by the brute realities of the Soviet Union: nothing wrong with the communist idea, they insisted, it just hadn’t been implemented properly.

 

But that logic is tricky for the Brexiters, because it’s they who have been in charge. The exit deal was signed, sealed and pushed through parliament by one of their own, Boris Johnson, and a conviction Brexiter is in Downing Street now, in the form of Rishi Sunak. So there has to be someone else to blame, other shadowy forces who betrayed the cause.

 

Some point to Sunak himself, aided by Kemi Badenoch, who this month halted the planned shredding of thousands of EU-tainted regulations. For others, it’s the Blob or the “remoaner elite”, made up of the civil service, the BBC, the universities, the unions: anyone who, along with desperate refugees in small boats, can be blamed for standing between Britain and the promised Brexit nirvana.

 

This is hardly a new dynamic. Nationalism, with its impossible promise of a perfect future, always has to have a traitor to blame for perfection’s delayed arrival. That is the process we are witnessing now: the steady nurturing of a stab-in-the-back myth for Brexit. History suggests that this hunt for the wielder of the treacherous dagger will only get nastier.

 

Which is why many were rightly alarmed by this week’s gathering in the name of “national conservatism”, where the writer Douglas Murray declared that nationalism need no longer hide its face just because the Germans had “mucked up” in the last century – a novel way to describe the murderous record of national socialism. That conference was a three-day search for those whose betrayal could be blamed for the failure of the Brexit project.

 

The quest will intensify as the damage caused by Brexit piles up. The worse the economy gets, the higher interest rates rise, the tighter incomes are squeezed, the louder and more vitriolic the attacks on the supposed true culprits will have to be – if only to quieten the obvious thought: namely that it is Brexit itself that is to blame.

 

It means those who opposed this madness from the start now have two reasons to break the understandable, if still bizarre, omertà on Brexit that prevails in Westminster. The first is the need to point to the source of our national ailing: if the patient is losing blood, you cannot keep ignoring the wounds where he shot himself in both feet. Less obvious, but no less urgent, is the need to acknowledge that Brexit’s failure is injecting a new toxin into the system, one that will spread the more apparent that failure becomes – and spread faster if we refuse to name its actual cause.

 

 

 

Edited May 20, 2023 by singalion