Man, 63, pleads guilty to sexually abusing his grandson

[TwoChnBTMs]

SINGAPORE - A 63-year-old man's sex abuse of his young grandson came to light after a seemingly ordinary conversation between the eight-year-old and his mother, who was reminding the boy to go to bed early.

The woman told the boy that if he could not wake up the next morning, he would have to stay at home with his maternal grandfather while the rest of the family went out.

This prompted the boy to confide in her that he did not want to be alone with his grandfather because the man had molested him.

On Thursday (Feb 22), the man pleaded guilty in the High Court to one charge of molestation and one charge of aggravated sexual assault by penetration.

Three other charges - one for molestation and two for showing a pornographic video to the boy - will be considered during sentencing.

He cannot be named to protect the identity of the boy.

 

The case has been adjourned to April 4 for mitigation and sentencing arguments.

The boy was between seven and eight years old when he was abused by his grandfather between 2015 and 2016 in the family's four-room flat.

One afternoon in early 2015, the man called the boy to his room and fondled him. When the family's domestic helper called for the boy, the man panicked.

He told the boy to get dressed and warned him not to tell anyone what happened as it would "create problems" with his parents.

In December that year, the man was sent to a drug rehabilitation centre. He was allowed to return to his family in September 2016.

More than a week after he returned, on Sept 28, the man sexually violated the boy in his room while they were alone at home. He again warned the boy not to tell anyone what had happened.

But the abuse was inadvertently revealed a month later, on Oct 22, when the boy's mother asked him to go to bed early.

After the boy told her he was touched inappropriately by his grandfather, the woman confronted her father, who admitted his wrongdoing and sought her forgiveness. A police report was made the next day.

 

[lovehandle]

I saw many threads that which gays don't like cocks? many ganna slapped when they shared that they find penises ok , same for me too, a penis is just another body organ like a nose

nothing special to fondle that much (of course if it is my own body , I m free to fondle it for achieving the final objectives of feeling high, not cos I luv cocks)

 

if one is to carry such thinking around , it is dangerous esp when u aged u have lesser market and u may not b convenient to frequent saunas or cruise that much

which straights don't like to fuck but they don't go around fucking or letting loose themselves

it s ok to have love for certain items , but show some restraints

 

 

 

 

I don't get what it meant by " sexually violated the boy"?

the mum must have hated the father in law, no apologies can let him off! best chance to throw a 63yo into the bars for good (while the cane is spared)

[Guest Xxc]

10 minutes ago, -Ignored- said:

 

I don't get what it meant by " sexually violated the boy"?

the mum must have hated the father in law, no apologies can let him off! best chance to throw a 63yo into the bars for good (while the cane is spared)

Read properly, the woman confronted her father

[lovehandle]

4 minutes ago, Guest Xxc said:

Read properly, the woman confronted her father

yes, sir

 

even worse loh,  the mum must have hated her own father! no apology can help, dumping a 63 yo into the bars

[Guest Jellyfish and William poke]

That is considered villian. But when I was a little boy, I was actually engross by Uncle TOP undress in knowing sexual identity. Though there is no molestation, it makes me realised that I had a neighbour whom too was half nude doing gardening. That is when I tends to feel fascinated and starting to get close to him by wearing my bicycle Lycra tights. Always Walking past the backyard to get sweets and food from provision shop. 

[fab]

Lady merciless.

[Ben Ben Ben]

Touching young boy is a sin be it stranger, Father, Grandfather, etc 

 

[LeanMature]

That's why it is called private part.  Even father cannot anyhow touch. Only mother and maid can "molest" boy while showering him.

[funbunny]

molest is molest, no matter which gender perpetrated it.

[Guest Idiots]

This pedo should be locked up for good.

[Guest johnsonklt]

5 hours ago, Ben Ben Ben said:

Touching young boy is a sin be it stranger, Father, Grandfather, etc 

 

 

yes  I  fully & totally  agreed.  It is a greatest sin that can nv be forgiven no matter how 

many times to apologise.  The worst of all the predator is fr within the family who 

suppose to protect the young ones.  This is the saddest story and the most difficult moment

for the mother of the child to report her own blood & flesh father to the police.  That grandfather

should be jailed& locked up for life till end of his life.

[lovehandle]

1 hour ago, johnsonklt said:

 

yes  I  fully & totally  agreed.  It is a greatest sin that can nv be forgiven no matter how 

many times to apologise.  The worst of all the predator is fr within the family who 

suppose to protect the young ones.  This is the saddest story and the most difficult moment

for the mother of the child to report her own blood & flesh father to the police.  That grandfather

should be jailed& locked up for life till end of his life.

wow, sounds like a tough judge

 

rem it is law , not emotions

 

in reality, it is often emotions

eg a wife ganna slapped and abused by husbd a trillion time

she endured

when she is determined to leave, the moment she learnt that she is pregnant, she endured again

whenever the husbd (pretend to) cried and begged for forgiveness, she again falls into it

that s the reality

 

for this case, I trust the mum is sick and tired having a drug addict and she must have felt the Dad will repeat his mistakes again
(once done is done,  u cannot rewind it even though the person is jailed a decade for that) but if  u think the person will repeat again ,  u will definitely call the police

BTW, if a supermkt caught u shoplifting, they will give first time warning for first time offender(why r they so kind????? cos this is on the belief that u will nt do it again), 2nd time : repeat offender and yes, they have recognising machine tht can identify repeat offenders in the security room, 2nd time, police will be called for sure!

 

hence something neutral must stand in between to "judge"

 

(those who break up from a cheated affair is not less painful than being sexual assaulted - a lot of u shd hve experience.........

but first time, u surely will  not breakup w him when u learn abt the cheating esp he cheat on your best pal who is ordinary looking and one whom u tot will never be your opponent)

However 2nd time or 3rd time, immed u will pack and go

and then call the police that he borrowed money from u since 10 years ago n he hasn't returned though he signed on so many pieces of IOU.........

 

the moment u learnt that a person will not repent, u will immed take action.......or u r sick and tired , u will take action

(be it an adult supposed to care for the young ones or is a partner who vowed in a church to luv u forever and to struggle the life of Lgbt in sg w u)

 

[camus]

this is really sick and sad and will be further ammunition for the we are against pinkdot brigade

[Steve5380]

2 hours ago, johnsonklt said:

 

yes  I  fully & totally  agreed.  It is a greatest sin that can nv be forgiven no matter how 

many times to apologise.  The worst of all the predator is fr within the family who 

suppose to protect the young ones.  This is the saddest story and the most difficult moment

for the mother of the child to report her own blood & flesh father to the police.  That grandfather

should be jailed& locked up for life till end of his life.

 

Bah!  Where is the measuring stick to determine what is "the greatest sin"?

It is easy to get carried away by emotions and feelings of nausea.

If not a perfect measuring stick, sins could be graded by the amount of victimization they cause.

 

In this case, if we ask the boy what would he prefer:  to be molested by grandpa or to lose a leg,

the boy surely would choose the molestation by grandpa.

And if he is a straight when he grows up, he still will prefer to have sex with another man than to lose a leg.

 

Therefore, to make a boy lose his leg should be a greater sin than to molest him.

And an even greater sin should be to kill a child (or any innocent person)

 

Some Christians consider that nothing is more repulsive to their god than homosexuality.

Yet Christians have caused the death of so many people...

who would have chosen homosexuality over death a thousand times...

[LeanMature]

Don't be confused.  This grandpa is straight and paedophile, the victim could be a girl too. Don't lump him as homosexual as in so many cases. Not fair to the community. 

[Guest Guest]

1 hour ago, LeanMature said:

Don't be confused.  This grandpa is straight and paedophile, the victim could be a girl too. Don't lump him as homosexual as in so many cases. Not fair to the community. 

Erm... the article clearly mentioned “His grandson”, “his mother” and “reminding the boy to go to bed early”

[Ben Ben Ben]

7 hours ago, LeanMature said:

That's why it is called private part.  Even father cannot anyhow touch. Only mother and maid can "molest" boy while showering him.

Father can shower baby boy or young boy la 

[camus]

10 hours ago, LeanMature said:

Don't be confused.  This grandpa is straight and paedophile, the victim could be a girl too. Don't lump him as homosexual as in so many cases. Not fair to the community. 

 

unfortunately those WAAPD won't see it that way

[TwoChnBTMs]

14 hours ago, LeanMature said:

Don't be confused.  This grandpa is straight and paedophile, the victim could be a girl too. Don't lump him as homosexual as in so many cases. Not fair to the community. 

This prompted the boy to confide in her that he did not want to be alone with his grandfather because the man had molested him.

[Guest Huney huney]

WAAPD insisting gays marry the opposite sex will result in more papas, grandpapas, and great grandpapas molesting their own sons and descendents.

 

Clearly, WAAPD are a bunch of inbreds!

[fab]

2 hours ago, Guest Huney huney said:

WAAPD insisting gays marry the opposite sex will result in more papas, grandpapas, and great grandpapas molesting their own sons and descendents.

 

Clearly, WAAPD are a bunch of inbreds!

 

So what does Waapd want?

 

On one hand they r against gays marriage, on the other they r against  gay marrying women.

[Steve5380]

13 hours ago, fab said:

 

So what does Waapd want?

 

On one hand they r against gays marriage, on the other they r against  gay marrying women.

 

Their goal could be to have an attentive outlet for their bigotry, ignorance,  prejudiced thinking. Or maybe they just don't like the color pink?

 

Anyone who makes gay husbands married to women a potential threat of molestation of their male children,

ignores how rampant is the case of straight husbands married to women molesting their FEMALE children.  It is especially common straight men molesting their stepdaughters.

[bluerunner]

Aiyoh.  That grandfather needs to be counselled and most probably, kept away from young boys. 

[Guest Incidious]

9 hours ago, Steve5380 said:

 

Their goal could be to have an attentive outlet for their bigotry, ignorance,  prejudiced thinking. Or maybe they just don't like the color pink?

 

Anyone who makes gay husbands married to women a potential threat of molestation of their male children,

ignores how rampant is the case of straight husbands married to women molesting their FEMALE children.  It is especially common straight men molesting their stepdaughters.

I mean some of these guys who had married women out of fear and need to hide their sexual identity will redirect their lust unto boys because technically they are more easily manipulated and cowed into silence than adult men. Makes sense?

[Steve5380]

5 hours ago, Guest Incidious said:

I mean some of these guys who had married women out of fear and need to hide their sexual identity will redirect their lust unto boys because technically they are more easily manipulated and cowed into silence than adult men. Makes sense?

 

I don't think so.  If these guys molest children, it is because they lust for children, not because children are more easily manipulated.  Pedophiles may not be interested in adult men, otherwise they could find them and manipulate them as easily as children, with much less risk.

[Guest Secretary]

6 hours ago, Steve5380 said:

 

I don't think so.  If these guys molest children, it is because they lust for children, not because children are more easily manipulated.  Pedophiles may not be interested in adult men, otherwise they could find them and manipulate them as easily as children, with much less risk.

Those are are the true blue paedophiles. There’s another type who goes for boys because men are more inaccessible. That’s situational paedophiles for ya.