Jump to content
Male HQ

Troll Guest/s Vs Nightingale (Compilation over the years)


Guest Guest

Recommended Posts

 

9 hours ago, Guest Guest said:

You sure seems to be very well aware of the age of sexual consent globally. That's very apt of a person with dubious dark character like the type that was mentioned before.

 

I just stumbled on it during a google search while I discovered the sexual age of consent in Japan is very low.

What makes someone a dubious dark character only because he mentions the different sexual age of consent by countries?

 

9 hours ago, Guest Guest said:

And you not only tried to downplay paedophilic tendencies as the reasons to troll him, you even went that far to defend him by claiming everybody do that? And do you really think by adding an obscure phrase of "teen boy (above the age of consent)" in your defense for him makes it legal? Do teen boys carry some kind of an age-stamp on their foreheads now to see if they are at legal age or not?

 

Guys who have sex with boys above the age of sexual consent are pedophiles?

Yes or no?

 

9 hours ago, Guest Guest said:

Sorry, I don't fantasize about teen boys at all.

Only because you don't fantasize about teen boys, others are not allowed to do so?

 

Do you consider any guys fantasizing about boys above the age of legal consent as perverts or criminals?

Yes or no?

 

You accept only what is within your very personal moral values without consideration what society or the criminal law says to such behavior? 

Yes or no?

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 6.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Fantasies are illicit?  So your moral police now extends to defining which kind of fantasies are legal and which are illicit!  Wow, you have made yourself a Fantasy Legality Judge.      

Self-righteous?  Aren't you talking about the one who decides what is illicit fantasising and what is legal fantasising?  That's called self-righteous.    Long-winded?  Too bad your cockroac

So you admit your behaviour is like the above officer's?  Want to nip buds when there are no buds to nip.  And when there're no buds, you imagine they exist!  LOL!

Posted Images

2 hours ago, Guest bullied said:

I just stumbled on it during a google search while I discovered the sexual age of consent in Japan is very low.

What makes someone a dubious dark character only because he mentions the different sexual age of consent by countries?

 

No need for so many "Yes or No" questions. The only type of people who check out the sexual age of consent are those who are either not mature enough to have sex, or old enough but with pedophilic tendencies. You disclosed yourself. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest 犯賤冰冰
1 hour ago, Guest Guest said:

 

No need for so many "Yes or No" questions. The only type of people who check out the sexual age of consent are those who are either not mature enough to have sex, or old enough but with pedophilic tendencies. You disclosed yourself. 

 

LOL 👋

Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, Guest Guest said:

 

No need for so many "Yes or No" questions. The only type of people who check out the sexual age of consent are those who are either not mature enough to have sex, or old enough but with pedophilic tendencies. You disclosed yourself. 

Means you try to escape in answering the questions. Running away like a small boy... because he knows once he answers he will end up red faced?

 

Avoiding  in answering the questions is admission that you are aware what I described in the previous post is not pedophilia, does not fall under pedophilia and has nothing to do with pedophilia tendencies.

Gay men who admire boys above the age of sexual consent are not pedophiles never have been and don't have pedophile tendencies if they think of sexual activity with boys who have attained the age of sexual consent. 

 

And you are aware if you had answered the questions you had ended up here like a totally drooled poodle and everyone laughing at you.

Laughing at you because it had been evident as you had been totally exaggerating this pedophilia thing, when there was never any case of pedophilia involved, nor something to describe as pedophilia tendencies.

Yes, it is clear why you preferred not to answer.

 

Pedophilia  is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children.

Sexual attraction to post-pubescent boys, does not fall under pedophilia.

 

Your whole point is absurd and outside of societal conventions and definitions what constitutes pedophilia.

You never had a point from onset.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Guest bullied said:

Means you try to escape in answering the questions. Running away like a small boy... because he knows once he answers he will end up red faced?

 

Avoiding  in answering the questions is admission that you are aware what I described in the previous post is not pedophilia, does not fall under pedophilia and has nothing to do with pedophilia tendencies.

Gay men who admire boys above the age of sexual consent are not pedophiles never have been and don't have pedophile tendencies if they think of sexual activity with boys who have attained the age of sexual consent. 

 

And you are aware if you had answered the questions you had ended up here like a totally drooled poodle and everyone laughing at you.

Laughing at you because it had been evident as you had been totally exaggerating this pedophilia thing, when there was never any case of pedophilia involved, nor something to describe as pedophilia tendencies.

Yes, it is clear why you preferred not to answer.

 

Pedophilia  is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children.

Sexual attraction to post-pubescent boys, does not fall under pedophilia.

 

Your whole point is absurd and outside of societal conventions and definitions what constitutes pedophilia.

You never had a point from onset.

 

Nothing to be red-faced about not engaging with kids who are not even supposed to be on this forum, or with pedophiles trying to justify their crimes here. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/12/2021 at 7:48 PM, Guest Guest said:

 

Nothing to be red-faced about not engaging with kids who are not even supposed to be on this forum, or with pedophiles trying to justify their crimes here. 

#escapeism

#caughtredfaced

#nopointtomake

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest GUEST
On 6/12/2021 at 6:10 PM, Guest bullied said:

Means you try to escape in answering the questions. Running away like a small boy... because he knows once he answers he will end up red faced?

 

Avoiding  in answering the questions is admission that you are aware what I described in the previous post is not pedophilia, does not fall under pedophilia and has nothing to do with pedophilia tendencies.

Gay men who admire boys above the age of sexual consent are not pedophiles never have been and don't have pedophile tendencies if they think of sexual activity with boys who have attained the age of sexual consent. 

 

And you are aware if you had answered the questions you had ended up here like a totally drooled poodle and everyone laughing at you.

Laughing at you because it had been evident as you had been totally exaggerating this pedophilia thing, when there was never any case of pedophilia involved, nor something to describe as pedophilia tendencies.

Yes, it is clear why you preferred not to answer.

 

Pedophilia  is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children.

Sexual attraction to post-pubescent boys, does not fall under pedophilia.

 

Your whole point is absurd and outside of societal conventions and definitions what constitutes pedophilia.

You never had a point from onset.

 

 

Shut up, fake news purveyor singaliar!!

Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...
counter