Population Of Singapore Discussion (Compiled)

[Guest Guest]

I think it is cultural affiliation rather than a pro-PRC agenda. Compared to the English and Chinese newspapers, Berita Harian would have more coverage on Middle Eastern and Islamic affairs. So it is natural. In fact, one whole page on China is not enough. I subscribe to a China blog site and every day, there are so much interesting news that Sg does not report. They highlight both the good and the bad - including how some ugly PRCs are treating their own kind there. Only a few get transmitted into Sg e.g. the infamous case of indifferent passersby ignoring the child victim of a car accident in Guangzhou and the girl died subsequently. China is a large country with so many cities, so it is natural to get lots of news about people, talents and weird news too. USA and Russia have large populations too, and so there should be equally much interesting news. But ultimately, it is up to the respective editors to use their discretion on how much to cover.

 

If you want to read more China news, buy the China newspapers lor. What's so difficult about that?

[Guest Agree]

People regardless of pro or opp who succumb to xenophobic sentiments stir up by evil people are wasting their time n energy. All should instead look at the real issue at hand now, which is the pressent ruling party lousy governance skills. Seriously.

I fully agree!

[Guest Well said]

Don't twist and misinterpret Singaporeans wish Gstc82. We want pap to place importance on its own citizens and moderate foreigner workers/"talents" inflow. That is the original message.we never say outright rejection of all foreigners. Don't be another li ye Ming in the making.

Well said. That trash's only principle is to distort what we have said. Just ignore him

[Guest Well said]

Don't twist and misinterpret Singaporeans wish Gstc82. We want pap to place importance on its own citizens and moderate foreigner workers/"talents" inflow. That is the original message.we never say outright rejection of all foreigners. Don't be another li ye Ming in the making.

Well said. That trash's only principle is to distort what we have said. Just ignore him

[joshboy]

This Li guy belongs to a federation which allegedly has close ties to the PAP. They were one of the associations which supported Tony Tan for presidency.

 

The part which disturbs me the most is a comment he posted on his Facebook - that "I don't believe I won't defeat him" (Mr Low). What has Mr Low done that this fellow sees the need to defeat him? *Even IF* say Mr Low had indeed incited xenophobia, the people elected him to parliament and it is for them to decide what to do. The country does not need some idiot like this to proclaim himself as the saviour and to attempt to defeat an MP we elected before this man was likely even able to vote. And he could even say in public that he believes he could win. How shallow.

 

He has invited the wrath of the entire country to descend upon him and he deserves everything that came his way. I almost never suggest for a person to go back to his/her own country but this man makes me want to do it so badly.

 

(Note: I am not xenophobic. I am not against all PRCs. I am against this man who just happens to originally be from China. He should go back to China.)

Why should he go back to china? just because he insulted ur "Hero"? so what he has supported the PAP? does that mean 60.1% of the pple should quit being singaporeans?

Objectively, he did not say anything against.. if he said something anti-singaporeans, sure.. but he's just having a political leaning, just like having a religion. Asking someone of a certain religion, political leaning or sexuality, is plainly wrong..

[Guest Guest]

[Guest Guest]

Why should he go back to china? just because he insulted ur "Hero"? so what he has supported the PAP? does that mean 60.1% of the pple should quit being singaporeans?

Objectively, he did not say anything against.. if he said something anti-singaporeans, sure.. but he's just having a political leaning, just like having a religion. Asking someone of a certain religion, political leaning or sexuality, is plainly wrong..

 

You?  Talk about "Objectively"? Please, you are one of the least objective person here.  Using your quotes "Screw you la" "Fuck off La"

[Guest Guest]

This is the last day of cny 2013. Many of is took this time to catch up with relatives and friends. Many of us do have relatives who married foreign spouse or are in a relationship with a non Singaporean. To those who want to get rid of all foreigners, will you tell your relatives and family who they should love? That they can't live in singapore if they marry a foreigner? That they can't start a family in singapore as their partner is a foreigner and crowd our mrt?

 

 

If you read Gstc82's text again, you will realise he is not targeting at the majority of us here.  Instead, he is targeting at those extremist anti-PRCs.  Do read the thread "What Do You Think about the PRCs You Know".  That thread was started by a PRC student studying in Sg.  He was sincerely asking for feedback but he had miscalculated the negative reaction and got more than he had bargained for.  He quickly beat a hasty but polite retreat. 

 

In that thread, trolls are raging against every Tom, Dick and Harry who asks them not to be so paranoid against PRCs.  They want a total eviction of PRCs whether talented or unskilled.  They post youtube clips of rude uncouth PRCs they have selected and then say, "See!  Another rude PRC shouting at one of our local vendors."   "Look at this PRC bitch throwing tantrums in a piano shop in China."  etc. in order to propagate the bad image of PRCs.  Some even say "Why should the Chinese newspaper Lianhe Zaobao devote one whole page on news on China?  Their govt and their people suck!"  So Gstc82 is just cautioning 

readers against being swayed by these irrational PRC-hating Talibans.

 

What excuses are people like gstc82 and Nightingale trying to come up with now? We are against the foreigners coming into Singapore taking over the jobs of Singaporeans PMETs, and the total number about 300,000, all holding to S-passes and above. How many Singaporeans are marrying foreign partners now?? 300,000??? Your obfuscation of the point is so obvious.

 

 

[gstc82]

What excuses are people like gstc82 and Nightingale trying to come up with now? We are against the foreigners coming into Singapore taking over the jobs of Singaporeans PMETs, and the total number about 300,000, all holding to S-passes and above. How many Singaporeans are marrying foreign partners now?? 300,000??? Your obfuscation of the point is so obvious.

well, you and your fellow "guest" should make up your minds . Are you selectively blind to all the racist post about low wage workers and foreign spouse? Lol.

[Guest Guest]

well, you and your fellow "guest" should make up your minds . Are you selectively blind to all the racist post about low wage workers and foreign spouse? Lol.

 

Are you blind? A simple scan through all the posts would have clarified that the issues have always been about the PMETs here. Get that through your thick skull. The way you twists our words is telling of your character. What will you be bringing up to contest here on this forum ... the Chinese pandas next??

 

The sentiments now are not against construction workers and domestic helpers. They are against foreign PMETs who come here supposedly to "steal" jobs that would otherwise belong to Singaporeans. Construction workers and domestic helpers will not face any opposition because they are not competing for jobs with anybody here. I do support having these foreigners here. I do not support the foreigners who come in to compete against Singaporeans when it comes to jobs on the basis that they are cheaper to hire, those who come here with the intention to commit crime, and those who come with the sole intent of benefitting themselves at the expense of Singapore and Singaporeans.

 

 

I think what the PAP should do now are :

1. Limit the entry of PMETs and keep these jobs for Singaporeans ; make it tighter and more difficult for companies who want to hire foreign PMETs and they must have proper justifications before hiring any foreign PMETs. Official retirement age of locals keep at an optional age of 65 and foreigners at 50, hence foreigners including the PRs hv to return to their motherland if they don't want to become a citizen.

2. Loosen up the work permits of those jobs which locals shun and this would relieve the shortages of manpower faced by the small and medium size companies.

 

 

Those people who are finally protesting are the PMETs, you think all foreign workers are here as cleaners and attendants only? That was the first wave, now even professions that can be taken up by dip/deg holders are taken up by all these cheap foreigners. You are still ignorant maybe because you are not affected yet.

[Guest Guest]

The whites are really digging their own graves. With their stupid policies. First they tekan the low income group now they want to f up the middle class as well. Totally treating ppl as unwashed mass. Well good luck with the people backlash in the upcoming days to come.

[Guest Guest]

 

 

[Guest Sammyboy]

This Li guy belongs to a federation which allegedly has close ties to the PAP. They were one of the associations which supported Tony Tan for presidency.

 

I wrote it my previous post. [right click here]

 

新加坡宗乡会馆、中华中商会、新加坡道教总会 all PAP supporters. 全部狼狈为奸。

 

I knew exactly which are the anti-PAP 会馆。

[Guest Sammyboy]

The whites are really digging their own graves. With their stupid policies. First they tekan the low income group now they want to f up the middle class as well. Totally treating ppl as unwashed mass. Well good luck with the people backlash in the upcoming days to come.

 

Now, then you know arh?!

[Guest 蒲松龄]

 

 

 

How can we make him lose his job and kick him out of Singapore?  Can somebody write in to ICA to complain him? 

 

Remember, there was a case where an ang-moh hurl vulgarities and threw something at construction site. (in Siglap) In the end, he lost his job.  :clap:

[Guest Sammyboy]

 

傅海燕、沈颖、Amy Khor talked lots of nonsense.

 

I have a friend worked with 沈颖. Wah lau eh...she is very very very crude to her 下属. Sim Ann threw things out the room.

 

[Guest Guest]

This one is government's most favoured type of foreigner, that is why so yaya. Most likely your efforts to kick him out will be in vain. 

 

The other one, i believe, most likely the company is already not too pleased with him, so when he go to construction site to create trouble, it is opportunity to kick him out. He didn't break any law. If he did, he would already have been arrested.

 

Got another case, the pinoy at seagate, u see they also didn't kick him out even though he say we are "rotten". If this were to happen in japan or korea, straight away their government will show him the door.

 

But many years ago, they did kick out one SIA pilot who is a malaysian PR. He organised a bargain with SIA and then Grandpa came out to settle. After that, they revoked his PR and kick him back to Malaysia. That time Grandpa a bit buay song. 

[Guest PSY_朴载相]

But many years ago, they did kick out one SIA pilot who is a malaysian PR. He organised a bargain with SIA and then Grandpa came out to settle. After that, they revoked his PR and kick him back to Malaysia. That time Grandpa a bit buay song. 

 

Year 2005, The SIA Captain Ryan Goh wanted to do something to benefit all SIA pilots. In fact, all SIA pilots supporting the Capt Ryan Goh.

 

Capt Mok HC tried to save him, but ALPA-S can't do anything. 

 

Poor thing. Something fell apart. It was not successful. Please do not misunderstood Capt Ryan Goh's intention. Those people involved in ALPA-S investigation will know the truth.

 

By the way, ALPA-S is always against SIA. 

 

SIA "alerted" old man and he stepped in. Capt Ryan Goh "swaay" lor... He kenna.

 

I met one committee member years ago. He told everything. He himself was unhappy with old man Lee. If there is pilot strike again, he will sure go for it. ALPA-S will give full support. I can tell everybody, many pilots are fed-up, just that they don't show.

 

May be, have to wait until old man being towed by highly polished dull-green expensive cannon pulley (see picture below), then we can expect to see "amazing and remarkable" change in entire Singapore's Pilots' employment.

 

 

[Guest Guest]

That Viktor Vassiltsov is a most arrogant Russian making derogatory exaggerated remarks on us.  But note that he is speaking only for himself and his warped views do not represent any significant number of Russians working here.  Furthermore, it is futile arguing with just a few foreign bigots like him.  A waste of time.  Just ignore.

 

Well, the part of why 50% of Singaporeans do not pay tax is quite true.

[Guest Edgar]

Actually, if we ask the question whether Spore, with highrise and more rail lines, can we take it up to 6m populations? A clear minded Sporean will probably tell you on instinct, that we could. 

 

SO what went wrong?

 

During 2005-2009, there was a gradual influx of foreigners, and the people kept warning the government that we are getting crowded with more people.  The government did not listen, and soon, with the programmed MRT incident one after another, the people just got fed up and lost confidence with the government.

 

The government will now needs to work hard to regain the people's confidence.

For Sporeans, ask youself, is it true that the government is so incompetent that we want to change it?

[joshboy]

What excuses are people like gstc82 and Nightingale trying to come up with now? We are against the foreigners coming into Singapore taking over the jobs of Singaporeans PMETs, and the total number about 300,000, all holding to S-passes and above. How many Singaporeans are marrying foreign partners now?? 300,000??? Your obfuscation of the point is so obvious.

 

 

 

unemployment is all time low at 0.8%, so how can they steal our jobs?

 

PMETS include call centre CSO, includes many clerical and office jobs that are low end and many Singaporeans do not want to do.

[Guest Guest]

unemployment is all time low at 0.8%, so how can they steal our jobs?

 

PMETS include call centre CSO, includes many clerical and office jobs that are low end and many Singaporeans do not want to do.

If some of them have not stolen some of our jobs, then why are we complaining? Because it is our nature to complain? Why they protest at hong lim? For a rock concert is it?

 

The recent electoral results speak for themselves. The results don't lie. They lost Aljunied and Punggol is already evidence strong enough to arrive at a convincing conclusion. These are early indications that most likely they are going to have some difficulties in 2016.

 

10% or 20% can be considered statistically insignificant. But 40% is still insignificant?

[Guest Guest]

Wait till a ft replace you only then you will feel it

Pls la!

Either you are too comfortable in your green pasture or way too high up there to realise this influx of ft pmets! Or you didn't have to compete with them for the job at all:p

[ctr77]

This is intriguing.  I need to be educated on this.  Please substantiate.

Could you provide me the source for this 50% thing?  Also could you explain this phenomenon?  Thank you.

 

The only way for a Singaporean to pay no tax is if he or she earns $20,000 a year or under. Although there are a large number of working Singaporeans earning lower than this amount, I don't think it is anywhere near 50%. Unless of course the Russian fellow was also counting the unemployed, senior citizens, school children/teenagers, and babies as part of that 50%.

[Guest Edgar]

If some of them have not stolen some of our jobs, then why are we complaining? Because it is our nature to complain? Why they protest at hong lim? For a rock concert is it?

 

The recent electoral results speak for themselves. The results don't lie. They lost Aljunied and Punggol is already evidence strong enough to arrive at a convincing conclusion. These are early indications that most likely they are going to have some difficulties in 2016.

 

10% or 20% can be considered statistically insignificant. But 40% is still insignificant?

 

I reckon you are talking about support for the government.

 

I think at about 60% support rate nationally, this is considerably healthy; that shows that Sporeans are thinking, and some opted not to support the ruling party.

I would be more than worried if more than 70% of Sporeans supports the ruling party, as that shows majority of SPoreans are blindly supporting the government.

 

Are in my previous posts, Sporeans need to ask themselves, granted that there are some mistakes made, but would Sporeans forego the current ruling party just to spike them? Based on some of the postings, it seems so.

[ctr77]

I reckon you are talking about support for the government.

 

I think at about 60% support rate nationally, this is considerably healthy; that shows that Sporeans are thinking, and some opted not to support the ruling party.

I would be more than worried if more than 70% of Sporeans supports the ruling party, as that shows majority of SPoreans are blindly supporting the government.

 

Are in my previous posts, Sporeans need to ask themselves, granted that there are some mistakes made, but would Sporeans forego the current ruling party just to spike them? Based on some of the postings, it seems so.

 

Based on my recent observations I am actually concerned about what would happen if the PAP should completely flop (not out of the question sometime in the future) and an opposition party was made to form government. Singapore has many deep rooted issues that would be tricky to navigate through and fix, particularly since there has been very little transparency in what the government does, and I am not sure if any of the alternative parties in Singapore are adequately prepared to handle this at the current moment if it should happen.

 

Most companies I've worked with have contingency plans. What happens if a director should die - we do this and this. If suddenly half the department contracts some alien illness, there are people who can take over their duties. The last company I worked with in Australia even went as far as to put half their staff in another country so that if something happened to everyone in the Australian office, that things would still continue functioning. It is troublesome and there will be inconvenience and problems that arise, but if push comes to shove, this can all be put into action.

 

But what happens when you have a government running a country which does not want to be transparent in its dealings. Governments can get voted in and out any time, as proven in other first world countries. In those countries, life still goes on. Departments change hands and then continue functioning. The Aljunied AIM saga has proven one thing - that even after death, the ruling party will still try ways and means to undermine and inconvenience whoever comes into power next. This is all done at the expense of the people, and if Singapore does see a change of government in the future, what sort of "AIM" saga will we see on a national scale, possibly at the expense of the entire country and its economy.

[Guest Guest]

I reckon you are talking about support for the government.

I think at about 60% support rate nationally, this is considerably healthy; that shows that Sporeans are thinking, and some opted not to support the ruling party.

I would be more than worried if more than 70% of Sporeans supports the ruling party, as that shows majority of SPoreans are blindly supporting the government.

Are in my previous posts, Sporeans need to ask themselves, granted that there are some mistakes made, but would Sporeans forego the current ruling party just to spike them? Based on some of the postings, it seems so.

It's childish and even dangerously deluded to think that Singaporeans voted against the ruling party just to "spite" them. Have you thought that opposition supporters are whom they are, simply because they no longer trust the ruling party anymore? What was it with MPs speaking against the white paper so vehemently but yet, at the end, still voted FOR it? It was never about "spiting" anyone. It was about the sense of trust. Please wake up.

[Guest Guest]

unemployment is all time low at 0.8%, so how can they steal our jobs?

PMETS include call centre CSO, includes many clerical and office jobs that are low end and many Singaporeans do not want to do.

What is your definition of PMETs again???? Clerical and office jobs? LOL!!!

If unemployment is at all time low at 0.8%, why was my taxi uncle just now holding a degree from NUS? Ooooooo....of course! He is still considered gainfully employed, even though his job was stolen by a foreigner!

[Guest Guest]

I reckon you are talking about support for the government.

 

I think at about 60% support rate nationally, this is considerably healthy; that shows that Sporeans are thinking, and some opted not to support the ruling party.

I would be more than worried if more than 70% of Sporeans supports the ruling party, as that shows majority of SPoreans are blindly supporting the government.

 

Are in my previous posts, Sporeans need to ask themselves, granted that there are some mistakes made, but would Sporeans forego the current ruling party just to spike them? Based on some of the postings, it seems so.

 

If i am not wrong, last time during Lao Goh's time, it is 70%+, then slowly drop drop drop till 60%+. There was one year i think is 2001 if my memory didn't fail me, there was recession, everyone was fearing for their job, not many dared to vote for opposition.

 

Your last sentence should be "based on early indicators" and not based on some postings. A few postings cannot be considered strong evidence. But the Punggol slap, the performance drop in GE2011 elections and the recent protest are significant evidence. Sorry, i cannot agree with your basis, but our conclusions are same   Maybe i am too fussy

[Guest Guest]

It's childish and even dangerously deluded to think that Singaporeans voted against the ruling party just to "spite" them. Have you thought that opposition supporters are whom they are, simply because they no longer trust the ruling party anymore? What was it with MPs speaking against the white paper so vehemently but yet, at the end, still voted FOR it? It was never about "spiting" anyone. It was about the sense of trust. Please wake up.

 

i cannot speak for everybody, but for myself, i dont want to spike them, i want them permanently gone. So what if they are very capable scholars or doctors? Their mission is to strive for their party's longevity. I rather vote for someone who is not scholar, but with a mission to put our interests foremost. 

 

Some of punggol residents have same thinking as mine, that is why they rather vote for normal stream candidate who is overseas grad than a specialist doctor. 

[Guest Guest]

What is your definition of PMETs again???? Clerical and office jobs? LOL!!!

If unemployment is at all time low at 0.8%, why was my taxi uncle just now holding a degree from NUS? Ooooooo....of course! He is still considered gainfully employed, even though his job was stolen by a foreigner!

 

My friend 30+ only, not really uncle, but drive taxi, got degree one. Last week my colleague introduce me to his friend, got masters, IT guy, now selling financial planners. If we observe around, this kind of case is not rare at all. Sad hor?

[gstc82]

My friend 30+ only, not really uncle, but drive taxi, got degree one. Last week my colleague introduce me to his friend, got masters, IT guy, now selling financial planners. If we observe around, this kind of case is not rare at all. Sad hor?

insurance agents who holds degrees is not a RARE thing. And if you are good you earn big bucks. And to u der stand deey the products now sold by insurance companies now is not as str8 forward as an old insurance policy.

[Guest Guest]

insurance agents who holds degrees is not a RARE thing. And if you are good you earn big bucks. And to u der stand deey the products now sold by insurance companies now is not as str8 forward as an old insurance policy.

What about taxi drivers with degrees? Are driving new taxis now no longer as straightforward as driving old taxis?

[Guest Guest]

What about taxi drivers with degrees? Are driving new taxis now no longer as straightforward as driving old taxis?

 

Nowadays they make u go through a course and must pass the test before they give u license to drive taxi. And u must know how to avoid ERP, what time and where. So in those sense, not as straight forward as in the past. 

[joshboy]

I have a friend without a degree but drives a taxi, but earn more than a degree holder.. u must also know how to plan route strategies to maximize your income. For instance one particular area is his money making machine in the morning ( I won't say where), so he have an arrangement with a neighbour to send him there, after which he start his money making rounds, and goes home for a nap. He usually work only 8 hours or less, and don't even bother having a relief driver at night.

 

Those that complain they cant earn much money is because they are at the coffeeshop drinking and expect to have customers, or at the airport queuing for 4 hours.. these are really dumb taxi drivers

[joshboy]

What is your definition of PMETs again???? Clerical and office jobs? LOL!!!

If unemployment is at all time low at 0.8%, why was my taxi uncle just now holding a degree from NUS? Ooooooo....of course! He is still considered gainfully employed, even though his job was stolen by a foreigner!

NO, but clerical and office are part of PMET and white collar jobs. Do you even know what PMETs stands for?

 

Having a degree doesn't guarantee you a job. please la wake up.. have any chapalang degree also . I have a friend who has a PHD in English.. guess what, she don't dare to speak and can't go through an interview properly. If degree = job then no degree = no job? Then why some "Ah bengs" earning 10k or more a month.

 

Singaporeans are voting blindly for the opposition sometimes. They have no policies no nothing. IF they run our country we will be DOOMED

[ctr77]

Most of the taxi drivers I've come across are really street-smart. And then there are those who supplement their income by doing other jobs part time, like the one I encountered over the weekend who is also a part-time stem cell supplement salesman. The good thing about this in Singapore (for now) is that only Singapore citizens can be taxi drivers, as opposed to some other countries where anybody can become a taxi driver. Let us hope that the government does not change this as part of their overzealous plan to invite more foreigners.

 

I will refrain from commenting about what makes people want (or need) to become taxi drivers for now, although the reasons are quite obvious. But I will save my opinion for another time.

[Guest Guest]

This one looks like Demon Choo's uncle if i not sala.

 

http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/1256529/1/.html

[Guest Guest]

I would not say I am pro or anti govt.  I just empathise with whoever is reasonable.  There are too many people who so blinded by their unhappiness (either directly or indirectly with the foreigners) that they have become irrational (including even some well-educated people) blaming everything on everybody else across the board.  There used to be no trolls in BW in all the threads I was interested in reading.  But towards the end of last year, they began to appear. I participated in two threads at first and got insulted with all sorts of names.  When people are overwhelmed by discontent, they cannot sieve through what other people write and vent out knee-jerk anger.  Everything seems black and white - either you are FOR or AGAINST us.

 

They become extremely self-centred:

 

a)  not wanting the Parliament to spend even one minute to discuss welfare issues e.g. letting foreign maids to have days off.  (humanitarian grounds)

 

b)  calling all foreigners trash or scum.  Some even split foreigners into two groups:  the PMEs (angmohs, Japs, Koreans, Malaysians) and the workers (PRCs, Pinoys, Indians, Banglas etc.) and say the former is good but the latter is shit. (irrational stereotyping)

 

Of course trash and scums exist everywhere in any society.  Foreigners are no exception, e.g. I had the misfortune to get some atrocious maids to look after my handicapped mother.  But then there is no need to go to extremism to give blanket labels and troll on those who cite cases of foreigners who are well-behaved, soft spoken and considerate.  They do exist in scores and scores, more than your heart is willing to acknowledge.

 

Dear Nightingale, thank you for your objective insight. 

I can only attribute Singaporean's behaviour to a case of a lack of QC at the borders. Indeed there are trash and scum in any society, but Singapore seem to have haphazardly imported too many of the low quality types without any checks. The sheer numbers is alarming, Singaporeans are outnumbered and they have affected us in many ways possible. Tolerance has reached the limit.

[Guest Guest]

Look at how slithery this animal is. First he asked how can people have jobs stolen when unemployment is at all time low of 0.8%? And on the same post, says call centre CSO are PMETs, and PMETs holds low end jobs.

 

unemployment is all time low at 0.8%, so how can they steal our jobs?

 

PMETS include call centre CSO, includes many clerical and office jobs that are low end and many Singaporeans do not want to do.

 

And then he was retorted with the following post laughing at his definition of PMET and asking why was a taxi uncle holding on to a NUS degree as the below posts.

 

What is your definition of PMETs again???? Clerical and office jobs? LOL!!!
If unemployment is at all time low at 0.8%, why was my taxi uncle just now holding a degree from NUS? Ooooooo....of course! He is still considered gainfully employed, even though his job was stolen by a foreigner!

 

 

And then he start slithering away with a stuuuuuuuuupid post about taxi drivers earning more than degree holder and talking about "maximizing routes" and "particular area money making machine in the morning"...

 

I have a friend without a degree but drives a taxi, but earn more than a degree holder.. u must also know how to plan route strategies to maximize your income. For instance one particular area is his money making machine in the morning ( I won't say where), so he have an arrangement with a neighbour to send him there, after which he start his money making rounds, and goes home for a nap. He usually work only 8 hours or less, and don't even bother having a relief driver at night.

 

Those that complain they cant earn much money is because they are at the coffeeshop drinking and expect to have customers, or at the airport queuing for 4 hours.. these are really dumb taxi drivers

 

And further ask if people know what PMETs stand for.... ??

 

 

NO, but clerical and office are part of PMET and white collar jobs. Do you even know what PMETs stands for?

 

Having a degree doesn't guarantee you a job. please la wake up.. have any chapalang degree also . I have a friend who has a PHD in English.. guess what, she don't dare to speak and can't go through an interview properly. If degree = job then no degree = no job? Then why some "Ah bengs" earning 10k or more a month.

 

Singaporeans are voting blindly for the opposition sometimes. They have no policies no nothing. IF they run our country we will be DOOMED

 

 

Yes, joshboy. We all know you talk to turtles, dogs and cats because you are lonely and have no friends. But now it is obvious you have no friends because you are a cold blooded slithering snake.

 

 

[Guest Nah...]

Yes, joshboy. We all know you talk to turtles, dogs and cats because you are lonely and have no friends. But now it is obvious you have no friends because you are a cold blooded slithering snake.

When animals see him, they start to bark, meow... etc, although they sounded different, the content is all the same, telling him "screw you la~~", "fuck off la~~"..... he looks at them & nods, eyes big big, mouth big big.....

He acts knowledgeable, telling you about other countries' policies, universities requirements etc, just make me laugh. Like he knows it all but he's nothing but a loud & big mouth. Still say he graduate with honours or something...with his type of "logic" & maturity, likely buy cert online or print in his own room.... LOL

[Guest Guest]

And the self claim multi million air, wht does hve to loose even as he say our country is doom when WP take over. Josh just ask urself , wht the fuck u doing in here. Ur sooooo rich , WTF u care

[ctr77]

NO, but clerical and office are part of PMET and white collar jobs. Do you even know what PMETs stands for?

 

Having a degree doesn't guarantee you a job. please la wake up.. have any chapalang degree also . I have a friend who has a PHD in English.. guess what, she don't dare to speak and can't go through an interview properly. If degree = job then no degree = no job? Then why some "Ah bengs" earning 10k or more a month.

 

Singaporeans are voting blindly for the opposition sometimes. They have no policies no nothing. IF they run our country we will be DOOMED

 

The opposition does have policies, you just haven't paid attention, or are unwilling to pay attention to what they have been saying. How do you know we will be doomed if the opposition gets to run the country? The country as it is now is already on a downward spiral to ruin and it is not the opposition which is in charge. I have my doubts whether the opposition will be able to effectively form government if it were to happen now - but it has nothing to do with their policies, but rather the venomous residue that would be left behind by the ruling party.

 

Some of the things you have said do make sense. Like you, I have an established career and consider myself successful. I have nothing to lose or gain if I vote either way. However I have eyes and I can see where Singapore is heading. I also have a heart that makes me think twice and three times where my support is going to go, because although I have ways of overcoming the policies that are in place here, there are many others who can't.

 

But in this instance, I don't think it is that Singaporeans are voting blindly for the opposition. It is that you are blindly supporting the ruling party.

 

(Note: I know you always have to have the last say so I will let you have it. I have said what I wanted to say and won't enter into a flame war with anyone)

[gstc82]

The opposition does have policies, you just haven't paid attention, or are unwilling to pay attention to what they have been saying. How do you know we will be doomed if the opposition gets to run the country? The country as it is now is already on a downward spiral to ruin and it is not the opposition which is in charge. I have my doubts whether the opposition will be able to effectively form government if it were to happen now - but it has nothing to do with their policies, but rather the venomous residue that would be left behind by the ruling party.

Some of the things you have said do make sense. Like you, I have an established career and consider myself successful. I have nothing to lose or gain if I vote either way. However I have eyes and I can see where Singapore is heading. I also have a heart that makes me think twice and three times where my support is going to go, because although I have ways of overcoming the policies that are in place here, there are many others who can't.

But in this instance, I don't think it is that Singaporeans are voting blindly for the opposition. It is that you are blindly supporting the ruling party.

(Note: I know you always have to have the last say so I will let you have it. I have said what I wanted to say and won't enter into a flame war with anyone)

to say its " a downward spiral" is overdoing it. Room for improvement, a huge yes,

[Guest Guest]

to say its " a downward spiral" is overdoing it. Room for improvement, a huge yes,

 

REAAAALLLLLLYYYYYYY.........??? gstc82 actually AGREEING that the ruling party has "ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENT"???

Wah saaaaay!! Looking at your verment and unyielding support for the ruling party in EVERYTHING they do, I'd say that you must be drunk when you typed your post just now.

[Guest Guest]

The opposition does have policies, you just haven't paid attention, or are unwilling to pay attention to what they have been saying. How do you know we will be doomed if the opposition gets to run the country? The country as it is now is already on a downward spiral to ruin and it is not the opposition which is in charge. I have my doubts whether the opposition will be able to effectively form government if it were to happen now - but it has nothing to do with their policies, but rather the venomous residue that would be left behind by the ruling party.

 

Some of the things you have said do make sense. Like you, I have an established career and consider myself successful. I have nothing to lose or gain if I vote either way. However I have eyes and I can see where Singapore is heading. I also have a heart that makes me think twice and three times where my support is going to go, because although I have ways of overcoming the policies that are in place here, there are many others who can't.

 

But in this instance, I don't think it is that Singaporeans are voting blindly for the opposition. It is that you are blindly supporting the ruling party.

 

(Note: I know you always have to have the last say so I will let you have it. I have said what I wanted to say and won't enter into a flame war with anyone)

:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:

[Guest Guest]

REAAAALLLLLLYYYYYYY.........??? gstc82 actually AGREEING that the ruling party has "ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENT"???

Wah saaaaay!! Looking at your verment and unyielding support for the ruling party in EVERYTHING they do, I'd say that you must be drunk when you typed your post just now.

 

Maybe he realised her labia is protruding more and more from retribution, he just step on her own cb lips and tripped.

[Guest PSY_朴载相]

This one looks like Demon Choo's uncle if i not sala.

 

http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/1256529/1/.html

 

Expose 1

 

 

 

Ex-PAP MP Choo Wee Khiang [1] [2] (<- See Picture).

Ex-PAP MP Choo Wee Khiang's nephew => PAP Demon Choo Pey Ching (Deputy Director)

 

To answer the poster, you are right!   

[Guest PSY_朴载相]

Expose 2

 

Ex-PAP MP Lee Yock Suan [1] [2] (<- See Picture).

Ex-PAP MP Lee Yock Suan's son => PAP Demon Lee Ti-Seng (Associate Director, Temasek Holdings). A current MP for Jurong GRC!

[Guest PSY_朴载相]

Expose 3

 

MahBT's son. Super white horse in the camp! Big size, super slacked. He no need to "chiong-suua-chiong-haii"! White horse in SAF is 100% true. Those people who witnessed will know his treatment.

 

He did not graduate local but in United States. My old friend who is a schoolmate together with MahBT's son. And I knew lots of unbelieveable stories from my old friend.