Guest Curious Posted January 1, 2012 Posted January 1, 2012 Hey. Im just wondering. Is it ok to have fun with a 16yr old boy?Im actually friends with his older bro. Thats how i got to know him. He knew that i was bi because i told his bro and he had to tell the 16yr old younger bro.He told me that he is curious and want to try 'it'. Is the legal age of doing it is 16? I need to know and should i continue to do want he wants me to do?He is kinda hot, young actually. Lol Peperolikes 1
descca Posted January 1, 2012 Posted January 1, 2012 Hey. Im just wondering. Is it ok to have fun with a 16yr old boy?Im actually friends with his older bro. Thats how i got to know him. He knew that i was bi because i told his bro and he had to tell the 16yr old younger bro.He told me that he is curious and want to try 'it'. Is the legal age of doing it is 16? I need to know and should i continue to do want he wants me to do?He is kinda hot, young actually. LolIn terms of gay sex, there is never ever a legal age and even for straight sex, its 18 so becareful if u want do with 16.
mango_juice Posted January 1, 2012 Posted January 1, 2012 I think the legal age in sg is 18... So is the rules here.. Dun think u can discuss this here.. But I'll be tempted to play with him since he's young and hot... Hehehe
mango_juice Posted January 1, 2012 Posted January 1, 2012 In terms of gay sex, there is never ever a legal age and even for straight sex, its 18 so becareful if u want do with 16.Lolx ya gay sex itself is illegal in sg even if it's 81 y/o...
qedcwc Posted January 1, 2012 Posted January 1, 2012 Hello, BW members, be careful not to get this forum into trouble, later our mods will come flying at ur throats.... oxymorons 1 "You like who you like lah. Who cares if someone likes the other someone because of their race? It's when they hate them. That's the problem."Orked (acted by Sharifah Amani) in SEPET (2004, directed by Yasmin Ahmad)
abang Posted January 1, 2012 Posted January 1, 2012 Stay away from anyone <Banned Words>....Too much implications....
jaden Posted January 1, 2012 Posted January 1, 2012 But do note that he or his family member can always turn around that u influenced him to do it. Then you should be able to visit our comfy jail, featured in newspapers and be famous. Nice Exchange for a few mins of orgasm. 很多事情 不是誰說了就算 即使傷心 結果還是自己擔 多少次失望表示著多少次期盼 事實證明 幸福很難我們之間 不是誰說了就算 拉扯的愛 徒增結局的難堪 一百次相愛只要有一次的絢爛 下一次 會更勇敢
Guest Ironrod Posted January 1, 2012 Posted January 1, 2012 (edited) But do note that he or his family member can always turn around that u influenced him to do it. Then you should be able to visit our comfy jail, featured in newspapers and be famous. Nice Exchange for a few mins of orgasm.Or his bro (your friend) may just punch u lolIf he (the 16yo boy) can keep his mouth shut it's fine but I just not trust kids - the never hold secrets. Edited January 1, 2012 by Ironrod EasleyLim 1
qez Posted January 1, 2012 Posted January 1, 2012 Legal age of consent is 16. Except for gay sex, which is illegal.If you want to be safe, ask permission from his bro lor.
EasleyLim Posted January 1, 2012 Posted January 1, 2012 Legal age of consent is 16. Except for gay sex, which is illegal. If you want to be safe, ask permission from his bro lor. "Eh bro, I suck your bro's dick can or not ah?"I imagine that would be preeeeetty awkward.
qez Posted January 1, 2012 Posted January 1, 2012 "Eh bro, I suck your bro's dick can or not ah?"I imagine that would be preeeeetty awkward."Uh dunno leh. You wait ah.""Ma! Pa! Didi want to try gay sex! Can my friend here suck didi's dick or not?"
EasleyLim Posted January 1, 2012 Posted January 1, 2012 "Uh dunno leh. You wait ah.""Ma! Pa! Didi want to try gay sex! Can my friend here suck didi's dick or not?"I would totally pay to see how this shit go down
Lovensick Posted January 1, 2012 Posted January 1, 2012 Not a lawyer so I can only state what I think...Penal code 377A prohibits any form of male-to-male sex - Imprisonment up to 2 yearsPenal code 376A prohibits sex with minor (below 16 years old), with or without consent - Imprisonment up to 10 years, and/or fine, in the case of below 14, Imprisonment up to 20 years and/or fine with or without caning.376A concerns sexual penetration of "the vagina, anus or mouth, as the case may be", i.e. that the it can be male or female that receives the penetration.So I think the legal age of consent in Singapore is definitely 16 years old for both male and female.So typically when gay sex issue goes to court, I think 376A is applied on those below 16, while 377A is applied on those above 16, though law minister would say they don't prosecute using 377A (hence there's no need to abolish it).Having said that, we also need a law expert to point out all the past cases regarding gay sex, because judges will rely on past cases to make decision...
Blacque Posted January 1, 2012 Posted January 1, 2012 Technically, it's ILLEGAL to have any sexual involvements with a 16 year old guy. Instagram: vodkabaker
Guest Irritated Posted January 1, 2012 Posted January 1, 2012 Happy New Year MOB...This is a repeated thread... kindly combine them together.. pretty misleading.And to the "Curious" guy who started this thread.. Shame on you.
HendryTan Posted January 1, 2012 Posted January 1, 2012 1. A guy with legal training briefly explained the following to me:a. In Singapore, the Age of Majority is 21 years old. Below that he is a "minor".b. Under Penal Code (ie Criminal Law), Section 87, a person above the age of 18, can give consent to be harmed provided it does not cause death or grievous hurt. The law clearly states 18yo as the age of consent for "general exception" to Penal Code offences. Therefore below 18yo, his consent may not necessarily be a valid defence for penal code law as it explicitly mentions 18yo as the consent. Singapore Penal CodeChapter IV. General Exceptions Act not intended and not known to be likely to cause death or grievous hurt, done by consent87. Nothing, which is not intended to cause death or grievous hurt, and which is not known by the doer to be likely to cause death or grievous hurt, is an offence by reason of any harm which it may cause, or be intended by the doer to cause, to any person above 18 years of age, who has given consent, whether express or implied, to suffer that harm; or by reason of any harm which it may be known by the doer to be likely to cause to any such person who has consented to take the risk of that harm.IllustrationA and Z agree to fence with each other for amusement. This agreement implies the consent of each to suffer any harm which, in the course of such fencing, may be caused without foul play; and if A, while playing fairly, hurts Z, A commits no offence.[indian PC 1860, s. 87]2. At BlowingWind, we use 18yo as a cut off age. This safe guard our readers and the mods. I believe the Singapore saunas use 18yo for probably the same reason too.3. Of course if the police wants to use 377A, both will still get it.But our Government has given assurance 377A will NOT be pro-actively enforced.4. My advice to everyone, stay clear of anyone under 18yo to be safe. And if there are guys here under 18 years old in BlowingWind, please leave immediately.BlowingWind is strictly for 18 years old and above only.5. Note that I am NOT legally trained, whatever I write here is NOT a legal opinion. Go ask your lawyer if you want a proper read of the law.
Blender88 Posted January 2, 2012 Posted January 2, 2012 (edited) So many lawyers here. Edited January 3, 2012 by Blender88
HendryTan Posted January 2, 2012 Posted January 2, 2012 Dear Blender88, you are from UK (your profile) where being gay is LEGAL.In Singapore, the operating environment is quite different.You said "But there were no repercussions for anyone". In Singapore we have cases where people doing gay sex with underage were fined in court and some even jailed. Therefore please qualify your advice that it is from a UK perspective.
Baloo Posted January 2, 2012 Posted January 2, 2012 Whatever the case, we still have peace because no one rocked the boat on this issue. Please do not tempt fate - the consequences affects us all, and not just the 'offender' alone .. this case, even 'death' will not atone the great harm done to this community when this shit hits the fan.
Blender88 Posted January 2, 2012 Posted January 2, 2012 (edited) Been quite windy here today. Raining too.Can I say that or is it off topic? Edited January 3, 2012 by Blender88
cool8 Posted January 3, 2012 Posted January 3, 2012 Whether the underage guy enjoyed the sex or not does not even begin to matter. Even if the sex was consensual, in the eyes of the law here it is still sexual exploitation as the underaged are considered to be vulnerable and unable to make fully informed decisions on their own, hence the need for legal protection.No doubt the law may have been broken thousands of times behind closed doors, but should the deed come to light, there is no way the older man can get himself out of trouble here in Sg. Period.
XiaoMessy Posted January 3, 2012 Posted January 3, 2012 (edited) Do anything you want, but don't get caught - armyThough, I don't support underage sexx Edited January 3, 2012 by XiaoMessy How to seek revenge 101: Know him. Befriend him. Make him trust you wholeheartedly. Destroy him. Utterly.
Guest Guest Posted January 4, 2012 Posted January 4, 2012 fxxk girl prostitute age 16 also get jail http://www.straitsti...ory_751668.html boy how.Ex-SLA exec paid underage girl for sex, jailed 9 monthsPublished on Jan 4, 2012 A former Singapore Land Authority (SLA) executive who paid an underage prostitute $100 for sex was jailed for nine months on Tuesday. -- ST PHOTO: ALAN LIM A former Singapore Land Authority (SLA) executive who paid an underage prostitute $100 for sex was jailed for nine months on Tuesday. Kum Ching Tiong, 57, slept with the 16-year-old Vietnamese girl at a Geylang hotel even though he harboured suspicions about her age, the court heard. The father of two started chatting to the teenager at a pub in Joo Chiat in July last year. When she told him she was 20, he did not believe her and asked to see her passport. She refused. Yet, he still swopped numbers with the girl after she quoted him $100 for 'short-time sex'. She later called him and they ended up at Meng Yew Hotel.
Guest AkgRtder Posted January 5, 2012 Posted January 5, 2012 its definitely not okay, think of the implications. not worth it. better to find some "mature" friends
Mercutio Posted January 8, 2012 Posted January 8, 2012 Hmm Mods, can we make this a sticky thread please ... There is no legal age for male same-sex activity because all male same-sex activity is a criminal offense under Penal Code section 377A. There is no official age of consent for males to agree to have sex with females.The legal age at which a girl may give her personal consent for sexual activity, be it with a male or another female, is 16 years old, under Section 140 of our statutes, except by way of marriage. Yes, there is still an antiquated law in our statutes which permits girls to be given away in marriage at the age of 14.The rule here at BW is 18 years old, presumably because the UNCRC and most countries consider 18 to be the age of majority, which is typically also the age of consent ... except in Singapore where age of consent is 16 for girls and the age of majority for both males and females is 21. No, it all doesn't make sense, but there you have it. A girl can agree to get fxxked at 16, but is not allowed to watch Restricted Films until she is 21. A guy can handle a rifle and be commanded to die for his country at 16, but can only open a children's saving accounts until he is 21. Mercurio sacris fertur Boebeidos Undis virgineum Brimo composuisse latus
Mercutio Posted January 8, 2012 Posted January 8, 2012 (edited) Been quite windy here today. Raining too.Can I say that or is it off topic?Dear Blender88.... all this is because of your dear Henry VIII. Almost every country in the entire world that has or has had anti-sodomy laws inherited them from the British Empire. Rule Britannia created these laws sometime in the 16th century, when old Henry made himself head of both Church and State because the Pope wouldn't grant him divorce from poor old Catherine of Arragon, and as part of his newfound "powers", decided to make buggery illegal. Edited January 8, 2012 by Mercutio Mercurio sacris fertur Boebeidos Undis virgineum Brimo composuisse latus
Mercutio Posted January 8, 2012 Posted January 8, 2012 Hey. Im just wondering. Is it ok to have fun with a 16yr old boy?Im actually friends with his older bro. Thats how i got to know him. He knew that i was bi because i told his bro and he had to tell the 16yr old younger bro.He told me that he is curious and want to try 'it'. Is the legal age of doing it is 16? I need to know and should i continue to do want he wants me to do?He is kinda hot, young actually. LolDear Curious,I have a friend who's 14 who would like to see how it is like to rape a girl. He's quite cute. Do you think I should help him find some silly convent girl so he can test out his curioisities? Mercurio sacris fertur Boebeidos Undis virgineum Brimo composuisse latus
Blender88 Posted January 11, 2012 Posted January 11, 2012 (edited) Dear Blender88.... all this is because of your dear Henry VIII. Almost every country in the entire world that has or has had anti-sodomy laws inherited them from the British Empire. Rule Britannia created these laws sometime in the 16th century, when old Henry made himself head of both Church and State because the Pope wouldn't grant him divorce from poor old Catherine of Arragon, and as part of his newfound "powers", decided to make buggery illegal.Actually, it's not quite that simple. The creation of the British Empire - one of the most powerful but shortest-lived empires in history of the world - was driven by mercantile trade, not by religion. By the time colonial territories were established and had to be administered, all kinds of laws came into existence. My guess is that the British did not wish to deal with same-sex relationships in these new 'societies' (too complicated!) so they imposed heavy anti-sodomy laws to make it less likely to happen. They probably also feared scandalous sexual incidents occurring between members of different races - too embarrassing!At some point they must have realised that some of their own people (us English and other Europeans) were beginning to look lustfully on peachy young local boys. (Just as the majority of ang mohs were looking lustfully at shapely young local girls). The British law-makers probably wanted to frighten other Brits into avoiding naughty behaviour and bringing the colonial administration into contempt.[by all means disagree with this if you like - but I am British and I know how our minds work - very differently from people in East Asian territories.] Hahaha. It's quite funny really, and NOTHING to do with religion. Edited January 11, 2012 by Blender88
Recommended Posts