Is it shameful of those “guilty by social justice” to claim they are victim of harrassment?

[Guest Self]

If one person is guilty by netizen’s social justice, is it shameful or fair for that person to claim he or she is a victim of harassment? 

[Guest Self]

^netizens’

[Guest Sorry what?]

On 5/21/2022 at 12:10 AM, Guest Self said:

If one person is guilty by netizen’s social justice, is it shameful or fair for that person to claim he or she is a victim of harassment? 

what the fuck is ‘netizens’ social justice’?

 

rather than correcting an apostrophe, you should make your question clearer because it is currently just a jumble of nothing. 

[Guest Guest]

You mean like how Sylvia Chan was outed and exposed for abusing all her slave workers at NOC, and she was subsequently roasted by everyone on the internet?

 

So, is she a victim of harassment? Answer: No, she is a victim of her own karma.

[Guest Shades of grey]

On 5/21/2022 at 12:10 AM, Guest Self said:

If one person is guilty by netizen’s social justice, is it shameful or fair for that person to claim he or she is a victim of harassment? 

The answer to your question is totally subjective.

 

Who gets to decide if the netizens’ social justice is just and correct? Just because a minority of people overall are then vocal about something online, does that mean that they are the ones qualified to dispense justice? Is it the people who shout loudest who are the ones who define what is right or not?
 

on the other hand, if people are proven guilty of something and this is discussed by people online or they are called out for it by netizens, does this amount to harassment? It probably depends on how far the calling out goes.

 

 

[auscent]

Many of these ppl did things that mainstream public find morally wrong. If they have good reasons or misunderstood, there is no need to play the victim card.

[Guest Keong]

Do not be a victim of keyboard warriors