Smoking Turns Me On

[Guest smokeboy]

I get a hard on and really horny whenever I smoke...had a ciggy in public just now I just had to stand so awakardly >.< any experience the same?

PS, am a new smoker here, it kinda turns me on...idk why.

[Guest Guest]

will feel high if i long time never smoke

[Guest Guest]

I get adrenaline rush whenever I smoke! and mind clears but i get a little dizzyness after that...is it normal?

[Guest It's the Nicotine dude]

seeing someone who is smoking turns me off totally already, let alone smelling the scent of 2nd hand smoke. World is polluted enough, don't want to inhale more deadly toxic gases to accelerate my demise.

For those getting instant or temporarily high, is because of the nicotine(harmful drug)content present in the cigarette.

"It is both a stimulant and a sedative to the central nervous system. The ingestion of nicotine results in an almost immediate "kick" because it causes a discharge of epinephrine from the adrenal cortex. This stimulates the central nervous system, and other endocrine glands, which causes a sudden release of glucose. Stimulation is then followed by depression and fatigue, leading the abuser to seek more nicotine."

Can read up more @ http://alcoholism.ab...ry/blnida01.htm

[abang]

My policy is simple.

I believe smokers are entitled to their nicotine-fix.

Of course, you have the right to smoke and I have the need to move away.

You may smoke but do not blow it in my direction.

[darkflame]

Sometimes the pxxn makes smoking look so sexy.

A topless hunk smokes while he gives you a lustful look.

[Clickclock]

I totally angree with nightingale on this one, that a sexy guy will look sexy even when he is holding anything.

in my opinion, smoking is a big turn off for me, as not only does the smell irritate the heck outta me, it gives the image that the guy smoking is uneducated and lazy. Not to mention the bad teeth and bad breath. Guys who are in the pink in health are way more sexier, being natural is always the way.

I personally do not support smoking, but i'm willing to tolerate people who smoke, cuz its non of my business and its their personal choice. However, if they cross into my personal space, blowing smoke on my face/ smoking in the same enclosed room where i cant breathe, its when they cross the line and they outta piss off and go decorate a pie.

[DragonRider]

Smoking can lead to emphysema, lung cancer, heart disease, bad teeth, hog's breath, gum disease, poor appetite, bad skin ... what is there to like? But this is a free world; unfortunately, non-smokers are exposed to dangerous second hand smoke even if they are not blowing their smoke in our direction.

[SwimVibe]

Not sure anyone noticed, there are toxic gases/ fumes released while smoking, no scent & colourless as well.

Even if the person is not blowing his exhaust at your direction, as long as he is near you, you will still take in the 2nd hand smoke and toxic gases, one being carbon monoxide. And gas diffuses very quickly and widely.

A friend's dad of mine passed away due to lung cancer caused by second hand smoke from his working area. He don't drink nor smoke and he thought its alright too as long as the smokers don't blow the smoke at his direction, but he was wrong.

[MarriedTop]

I get adrenaline rush whenever I smoke! and mind clears but i get a little dizzyness after that...is it normal?

same to me as well.

[Guest guest]

i quit smoking cold turkey... cos of my high bp.

and i only in my late 20s.

[Guest Guest]

some ppl can smoke till old also didnt die of cancer. some dont smoke at all but get cancer....

for me, i only smoke during weekends when i go out w frens who smoke too. and smoking too much makes me breathless but i still enjoy the process.

[TheVisitors]

This thread started for members and guest to comment regarding smoking and sex appeal.

It is not for some oldies nor for some self righteous to commment their views on the pros and cons of smoking and it effect on your health.

How cares a shit what you think.

Smoking is not illegal, thus that doesn't give you the right to judge what they decide to do with their lungs.

Don't like the smell of smoke, afraid you will die sooner or later from inhaling the fume. then move yourself somewhere.

You know, the same group of people who condemn smokers for contributing second hand smoke into the fresh clean air, there the same group of hypocrites who pollute the air by releasing so much carbon monoxide into the atmosphere when they drive their cars.

Ever thought about that?

You also probably forgot that the industries you are against polluting the air , and releasing chemicals into the streams, are the same industries, which created things that geared your lifestyles, and all your fanciful gadgets which you yourself cannot survive or live without.

Personally I think guys who smoke look pretty cool, probably that enchanced the bad boy image.

This is not because I was an ex heavy smoker, who slowly give up the habit automatically when they no longer manufacture Cartier menthol cigarettes

(Presently a social smoker who survives on one packet a week).

The menthol in the cigarettes not only clears your sinus, and gives a lighter mind to think clearer, it has this aphrodisiac effect.

When the menthol mixes wih the human saliva, somehow, your breath becomes more alluring, and when you taste this mixture while french kissing a smoker....wow...it is absolutely mind blowing,

Thus to me, having sex with a menthol smoker, adds so much value when one is having sex !

It is like having an aroma theraphy session, but a bit more ...aphrodisiac !

[Guest Outdoors]

I like to smoke topless in the void deck. Don't like it when the shirt absorbs the smoke smell.

[pittsburgh]

Gays who smoke are a big turn off for me!!! They are not hot and not sexy!!!

[Guest Stop the unneccesity]

I always get amazed to see some ppl who just love to pick up a fight over small matters of ppl making their views on smoking.

Personally I feel that ppl using excuses saying there's other factors contributing to pollution of the air are lame and narrow minded.

Industries are needed to get the country going financially, cars are daily necessities. we have to admit to the fact that our main way of transport and convenience now in cities are via vehicles, that is why ppl are inventing more environmental friendly vehicles.

Smoking is not a necessity, everyone can survive without smoking, and by reducing this addiction and good for nth habit, which hv total no contribution to anyone, instead it harms totally, we can reduce the extra pollution in the environment. It harms, it kills, not only yourself, and does no gd but just mere temp pleasure giving and producing narrow minded view of it looks cool.

[TheVisitors]

I always get amazed to see some ppl who just love to pick up a fight over small matters of ppl making their views on smoking.

Personally I feel that ppl using excuses saying there's other factors contributing to pollution of the air are lame and narrow minded.

Industries are needed to get the country going financially, cars are daily necessities. we have to admit to the fact that our main way of transport and convenience now in cities are via vehicles, that is why ppl are inventing more environmental friendly vehicles.

Smoking is not a necessity, everyone can survive without smoking, and by reducing this addiction and good for nth habit, which hv total no contribution to anyone, instead it harms totally, we can reduce the extra pollution in the environment. It harms, it kills, not only yourself, and does no gd but just mere temp pleasure giving and producing narrow minded view of it looks cool.

Then may I asked you, owning a car ,especially here , is it a necessity or a luxury?

What you see unimportant or unnecessary, is someone else's priority.

You can live without owning a car, and you can live without smoking.

But how someone wishes to do with their income, is none of anyone's business.

My point here is very simple. What you see as your necessity, doesn't gives you the right to override someone else's choice.

What you see as your necessity ( in this case driving a car) doesn't give you anymore right to release so much carbon monoxide into the air when you start your engine everytime.

Like it or not, you have just contradicted yourself when you accuse a smoker for exhaling unhealthy second hand smoke.

Per exhale of smoke from a cigerette vs per omission of the monoxide from your car, in terms of volume, which is more?

Mind you, you can die in your own car , when you breath carbon monoxide released by your own car, into your own car with all windscreen up.should you taper with the car's sysem, only within minutes.

Would you like to try?

Don't be so narrow minded as to think someone here is picking up a fight, when he is hightlightng a fact which many overlooked, when they point finger at others, only to realize they are also contributing to the pie, if not, even more.

You campaign fervently to save the trees, to save illegal lumbering and deforestation, yet you can't wait, to get hold of your Straits Times first thing in the morning, just to read how your shares are doing.

And I hope your shares have nothing to do with timber products.

[Guest jayy]

Not a smoker myself, but I can vouch for the menthol-cigg-french kiss combination it is quite a turn-on.

Cigars enhance the "gruff" look that lots of bear/g-men types like to pull off.

[Guest Turn off]

Seeing ppl smoke is a total turn off!

Those who gets turn on by people who smokes are sick!

[imchaser]

Theres nothing more turn off than a person who proudly claimed that he hates and discriminates against smokers. If u cant stand smokers and so afraid what the second or third hand smokes might do to u, then i suggest u the one moving to a forest, not the smokers. Cos Singapore is one of the most smoking-discipline countries in the world. Advise to u is dont go anywhere travel. Just hide in your room with all the window close. In other asia countries, most people even orang utan smokes.

[Guest BohoChic]

I'm not a smoker and my entire family are not smokers too, but I second TheVisitor. To each his/her own. I simply respect the next person. I have many friends that smoke and I accept them as who they are, not whether they smoke or not, whether they are fat or skinny, whether they pierce their tongues or not, if they dress in an ivy-league style or punk-rock style, whether they are straight, butch, flamboyant, bear, whether rich or poor, if they have tattoos or not, whether beautiful or not-so-beautiful! If my future partner smokes, so be it. I may advise him to smoke less out of concern, but I definitely won't condemn like what many are doing here. It is also not entirely true that smoking kills/harms coz there are many factors at play. Many American, European and PRC Chinese smokers live to ripe old age.

[TheVisitors]

a) Why do some smokers live to a ripe old age, whereas some non-smokers die younger of cancer? Answer - each of us has cancer cells in our bodies. They are part of our genetic makeup which cannot be gotten rid of, and are waiting to be activated. Stress (including anger, bitterness), chemicals like air pollutants (toxic chemicals like vehicle exhaust fumes, tobacco substances, etc) help to increase the chances of their being activated. However, those with strong genes (both smokers and non-smokers) do not get cancer whereas those with weaker genes (both smokers and non-smokers) are more prone to get cancer. Therefore, smokers are not totally convinced that smoking can lead to lung diseases, heart, respiratory troubles etc as they age. They therefore persist in smoking. They mock at all efforts to deter smoking, including putting disease-stricken pictures on the cover of cigarette boxes. One of my students was a smoker who had quit smoking. He told me he would not give up smoking were it not for the fact that the doctor examined his heart and found a hole in it.

b) Nicotine is the seducer. Just like many junk food - the sugar, salt, MSG, fats - are all seducers. Therefore smokers confirm the positive effects such as - make them feel high, look sexy, etc etc. Junk food restaurants are not going to stop their ads and young impressionable children will swear and say that these fried chicken, French fries, Pepsi-Coke, etc are really yummy. But wait! What kind of message are we getting across if we do not put a stop to it? We will be condoning it and say "Children, you are right. Really yummy. Go ahead. Eat them every weekend." So please, we are not trying to be self-righteous. We don't want others to be misled. When I saw a movie that portrays the hero lighting up, I just get turned off. What are film directors trying to sell? That smoking is manly? Non-smokers are not? That is utterly misleading. Children will be misled, thinking that when they grow up, they should smoke to show they have "grown-up". If you are angry, smoke. Feeling sad or lonely? Smoke again. If you are thinking hard over a problem, smoke.

c) Sure, if you have a tattoo or earring, it does not affect the others. But smoking directly affects every living thing, man or animal for a radius of twenty metres at least. (The only good thing is that smoking keeps mosquitoes away). I pity the babies who are put in prams as their parents smoke and push the prams along. Vehicles that release exhaust fumes do not make smoking any less sinful. Driving motor vehicles has become a necessity and we cannot afford to drive bullock carts. I hope battery cars and solar cars will one day replace the present petrol-based vehicles. Every day, millions of people are breathing the terrible exhaust fumes and they do not complain (because it is futile or because they are not aware that exhaust fumes are carcinogens too). Who knows? I may die of it too. We are all trapped in it. But the introduction of battery cars is a good beginning.

d) Both car ownership and smoking are choices. But we can exercise a stronger individual choice over smoking. We are not born to favour smoking and neither do animals. Smoking was introduced by the Portugese and the Spanish after they discovered that tobacco was smoked by South American natives to make them feel euphoric (same thing with opium, ganja etc.) Long before the Industrial Revolution, the world air was clean (except polluted by volcanic ash and bush fires).

e) Sure, non-smokers have no business if smokers choose to have dark teeth and bad breath and voluntary self-pollution. But they have no right to affect the air that the others breathe. Even my ex-classmate smoker said he could not stand cigarette smoke UNLESS he himself also smoked at the same time. So smokers are the ones who should not deprive the majority of good clean air. Why should the majority suffer in silence or in ignorance? Furthermore, many smokers also throw cigarette butts on the ground after consumption or just before getting into the bus or taxi - an additional pollution problem.

f) It is arrogant to say that since a smoker or smoking sympathiser started this thread, all subsequent contributors must not contradict the posting, even with solid reasoning. As usual, die-hard smokers will not accept what has been said. Many feathers will be ruffled for sure. They get defensive when their bad habits are attacked, and they will brand all critics as being judgemental self-righteous kaypohs. All health warnings will go unheeded, just like AIDS. But when you do get the health complications, it will be too late! Due to smoking, my half-brother died of lung cancer at the age of 60. His genes had been strong but then, he could have enjoyed life longer. If you know you are going to live till 90 hale and hearty despite smoking, jolly good then. But please do not put others at risks because we won't know who has strong genes and who has weak ones.

This thread is about smoking and sex related issue.

It is not for you to stick your nose and give your very boring stereotyped, five cents worth view of the harmful effects of smoking.

Please answer within the context. It is as easy as answering a comprehension passage during your school days.

If a topic allows very general views, then you can stick your nose in by all means, and say what you want, even your name is not Pinocchio.

Thank you.

[Guest Smokers die]

drug addicts. look down on smokers :whistle:

[TheVisitors]

drug addicts. look down on smokers :whistle:

Everyone will have to die eventually dude

Life is very very very unpredictable.

You may even end up in a death more painful and horrific than smokers

[Guest smoker]

a) Why do some smokers live to a ripe old age, whereas some non-smokers die younger of cancer? Answer - each of us has cancer cells in our bodies. They are part of our genetic makeup which cannot be gotten rid of, and are waiting to be activated. Stress (including anger, bitterness), chemicals like air pollutants (toxic chemicals like vehicle exhaust fumes, tobacco substances, etc) help to increase the chances of their being activated. However, those with strong genes (both smokers and non-smokers) do not get cancer whereas those with weaker genes (both smokers and non-smokers) are more prone to get cancer. Therefore, smokers are not totally convinced that smoking can lead to lung diseases, heart, respiratory troubles etc as they age. They therefore persist in smoking. They mock at all efforts to deter smoking, including putting disease-stricken pictures on the cover of cigarette boxes. One of my students was a smoker who had quit smoking. He told me he would not give up smoking were it not for the fact that the doctor examined his heart and found a hole in it.

b) Nicotine is the seducer. Just like many junk food - the sugar, salt, MSG, fats - are all seducers. Therefore smokers confirm the positive effects such as - make them feel high, look sexy, etc etc. Junk food restaurants are not going to stop their ads and young impressionable children will swear and say that these fried chicken, French fries, Pepsi-Coke, etc are really yummy. But wait! What kind of message are we getting across if we do not put a stop to it? We will be condoning it and say "Children, you are right. Really yummy. Go ahead. Eat them every weekend." So please, we are not trying to be self-righteous. We don't want others to be misled. When I saw a movie that portrays the hero lighting up, I just get turned off. What are film directors trying to sell? That smoking is manly? Non-smokers are not? That is utterly misleading. Children will be misled, thinking that when they grow up, they should smoke to show they have "grown-up". If you are angry, smoke. Feeling sad or lonely? Smoke again. If you are thinking hard over a problem, smoke.

c) Sure, if you have a tattoo or earring, it does not affect the others. But smoking directly affects every living thing, man or animal for a radius of twenty metres at least. (The only good thing is that smoking keeps mosquitoes away). I pity the babies who are put in prams as their parents smoke and push the prams along. Vehicles that release exhaust fumes do not make smoking any less sinful. Driving motor vehicles has become a necessity and we cannot afford to drive bullock carts. I hope battery cars and solar cars will one day replace the present petrol-based vehicles. Every day, millions of people are breathing the terrible exhaust fumes and they do not complain (because it is futile or because they are not aware that exhaust fumes are carcinogens too). Who knows? I may die of it too. We are all trapped in it. But the introduction of battery cars is a good beginning.

d) Both car ownership and smoking are choices. But we can exercise a stronger individual choice over smoking. We are not born to favour smoking and neither do animals. Smoking was introduced by the Portugese and the Spanish after they discovered that tobacco was smoked by South American natives to make them feel euphoric (same thing with opium, ganja etc.) Long before the Industrial Revolution, the world air was clean (except polluted by volcanic ash and bush fires).

e) Sure, non-smokers have no business if smokers choose to have dark teeth and bad breath and voluntary self-pollution. But they have no right to affect the air that the others breathe. Even my ex-classmate smoker said he could not stand cigarette smoke UNLESS he himself also smoked at the same time. So smokers are the ones who should not deprive the majority of good clean air. Why should the majority suffer in silence or in ignorance? Furthermore, many smokers also throw cigarette butts on the ground after consumption or just before getting into the bus or taxi - an additional pollution problem.

f) It is arrogant to say that since a smoker or smoking sympathiser started this thread, all subsequent contributors must not contradict the posting, even with solid reasoning. As usual, die-hard smokers will not accept what has been said. Many feathers will be ruffled for sure. They get defensive when their bad habits are attacked, and they will brand all critics as being judgemental self-righteous kaypohs. All health warnings will go unheeded, just like AIDS. But when you do get the health complications, it will be too late! Due to smoking, my half-brother died of lung cancer at the age of 60. His genes had been strong but then, he could have enjoyed life longer. If you know you are going to live till 90 hale and hearty despite smoking, jolly good then. But please do not put others at risks because we won't know who has strong genes and who has weak ones.

I'm a smoker and I enjoyed reading your post.