abang Posted December 19, 2012 Report Share Posted December 19, 2012 Naming Ms Ong was a means to end all speculation.It was also a means to tell the world that PAP knows everything.Too bad..Back to the industrious nature of MP... they are selected through stringent rounds of recommendations/proposals and interviews.They cant be a NOBODY in their respective area of work/contribution.And once elected, they are there to serve the residents.Of course, the MP's allowance is quite sizeable to a layman but it is the social clout (为人民服务, 不为钱 但有名)This is not to say the effectiveness of the elected MP...Mine is horrendous and looks like a PIG... still the Lift Upgrading Programme has not been implemented physically.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted December 19, 2012 Report Share Posted December 19, 2012 On 12/19/2012 at 8:55 AM, abang said: Back to the industrious nature of MP... they are selected through stringent rounds of recommendations/proposals and interviews.They cant be a NOBODY in their respective area of work/contribution.I think that's so not true. Did anybody know who was TPL before her "I dunno wat to say" stomping? And frankly, I doubt if anybody even knew who half of our MPs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EasleyLim Posted December 19, 2012 Report Share Posted December 19, 2012 On 12/19/2012 at 5:30 AM, hunky uncle said: That is his job. If he does it well then what does it matter?Great men in history have more wives and more mistresses. That don't make them less great.Only the little men and little women demand equality for what they cannot get.In Japan, it is considered prestigious to have a mistress. Only rich or handsome our powerful men can attract a woman to be his mistress. Others can only envy. But in Japan, they envy yet they don't throw moralistic demands. They only demand efficient men.Here some Singaporeans are petty. Nothing better to do but gossip about others. Others couldn't care less and these petty ones make all the noise because they are jealous of what they don't have.I disagree. While it's true that a person's capabilities should be judged seperately from his life, that doesn't apply to public figures. The people elected them with the faith that the politicians will do the right thing for the public. These are people with the power to decide policy that will affect everyone, and with that kind of power we need assurance that they won't misuse it. So one of the ways we do that is to look at their moral integrity. This is their responsibility in exchange for the power we give them.We're letting them run a country, not a corporation. If it was private sector then your japanese analogy would apply. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted December 19, 2012 Report Share Posted December 19, 2012 On 12/19/2012 at 10:01 AM, EasleyLim said: I disagree. While it's true that a person's capabilities should be judged seperately from his life, that doesn't apply to public figures.The people elected them with the faith that the politicians will do the right thing for the public. These are people with the power to decide policy that will affect everyone, and with that kind of power we need assurance that they won't misuse it. So one of the ways we do that is to look at their moral integrity.This is their responsibility in exchange for the power we give them.We're letting them run a country, not a corporation. If it was private sector then your japanese analogy would apply.I would disagree with that. I really don't care much about Michael Palmer's affair, neither was I interested in YSL's affair too. Like what the last guy had said: what one do in his private life has nothing to do with his professional life, public figure or no public figure. However, I went all out to bash Michael Palmer in, just so that he can have a taste of the same medicine that his party had meted out to YSL during the YSL saga. Let teh lesson be learnt: People living in glass houses shouldn't be throwing stones (and much less be having sexual affairs inside). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest hunky uncle Posted December 19, 2012 Report Share Posted December 19, 2012 On 12/19/2012 at 10:01 AM, EasleyLim said: I disagree. While it's true that a person's capabilities should be judged seperately from his life, that doesn't apply to public figures. The people elected them with the faith that the politicians will do the right thing for the public. These are people with the power to decide policy that will affect everyone, and with that kind of power we need assurance that they won't misuse it. So one of the ways we do that is to look at their moral integrity. This is their responsibility in exchange for the power we give them.We're letting them run a country, not a corporation. If it was private sector then your japanese analogy would apply.Think carefully about it. This is the exact same reason they are peeping into closed door and deciding that what happens between two consenting adults are the public's business. Hence 377A is there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gstc82 Posted December 19, 2012 Report Share Posted December 19, 2012 On 12/19/2012 at 10:43 AM, Guest said: I would disagree with that. I really don't care much about Michael Palmer's affair, neither was I interested in YSL's affair too. Like what the last guy had said: what one do in his private life has nothing to do with his professional life, public figure or no public figure. However, I went all out to bash Michael Palmer in, just so that he can have a taste of the same medicine that his party had meted out to YSL during the YSL saga. Let teh lesson be learnt: People living in glass houses shouldn't be throwing stones (and much less be having sexual affairs inside). well, once again, did WP officially said YSL fxxks others besides his wife? WP kept silent and YSL went MIA. That I the big difference. Did the PAP bashed WP abt it? Well, all pap said was to come clean and give the public an answer. YSL was sacked from WP not becos he an an affair hor. Neither was that woman involved asked to leave WP as all sides were basically silent even now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gstc82 Posted December 19, 2012 Report Share Posted December 19, 2012 On 12/19/2012 at 8:43 AM, Guest said: First, you say :and then when confronted with the fact that Laura Ong did not admit nor deny, you say:So if she admit, PAP can do a slut-shame on Laura Ong, and if she don't admit, PAP can still do a slut-shame on her, is it? Make up your mind leh.... STUUUUUPID. hahaha, besides name calling n Intimidate what else u not do huh? You are telling us that it is ok for any political party and government to do "selective disclosure"? Seriously this is what you want? Another case of one set of rules for the PAP but opposition political party it's politicians "anything also can want lah". Typical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted December 19, 2012 Report Share Posted December 19, 2012 On 12/19/2012 at 12:05 PM, gstc82 said: well, once again, did WP officially said YSL fxxks others besides his wife? WP kept silent and YSL went MIA. That I the big difference. Did the PAP bashed WP abt it? Well, all pap said was to come clean and give the public an answer. YSL was sacked from WP not becos he an an affair hor. Neither was that woman involved asked to leave WP as all sides were basically silent even now.That's right man, all sides and everyone is silent now and u r the only bitch barking non stop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gstc82 Posted December 19, 2012 Report Share Posted December 19, 2012 On 12/19/2012 at 12:16 PM, Guest said: That's right man, all sides and everyone is silent now and u r the only bitch barking non stop. than r u a ghost? Are u not "someone"? Again use words like "ALL sides" and " Everyone", sure or not? U n your "guests" are silent (for now) its becos your bellowed WP and LTK screw up in its handling of YSL"s case by shutting out and non disclosures of what happens behind closed doors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EasleyLim Posted December 19, 2012 Report Share Posted December 19, 2012 On 12/19/2012 at 11:58 AM, hunky uncle said: Think carefully about it. This is the exact same reason they are peeping into closed door and deciding that what happens between two consenting adults are the public's business. Hence 377A is there.That's too bad then. Society is not ready to accept homosexuals now but does that means we should throw away that MP that opposes the repeal of 377A but does his job well and take in a corruptable one that support gay rights?If the sacrifice of my rights means the country will prosper then I will glady have it revoked. Dangerous mentality no doubt, but I'm not blindly loyal either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest hunky uncle Posted December 19, 2012 Report Share Posted December 19, 2012 On 12/19/2012 at 12:47 PM, EasleyLim said: That's too bad then. Society is not ready to accept homosexuals now but does that means we should throw away that MP that opposes the repeal of 377A but does his job well and take in a corruptable one that support gay rights?If the sacrifice of my rights means the country will prosper then I will glady have it revoked. Dangerous mentality no doubt, but I'm not blindly loyal either.No, it is the sacrifice of your brain that allows politicians to use the term "和谐" to suppress the people.Look it up and grow a spine, be a man and not a sheep to be manipulated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EasleyLim Posted December 19, 2012 Report Share Posted December 19, 2012 On 12/19/2012 at 1:27 PM, hunky uncle said: No, it is the sacrifice of your brain that allows politicians to use the term "和谐" to suppress the people.Look it up and grow a spine, be a man and not a sheep to be manipulated.Maybe you should be the one that should more of a man and less of a child, and do the right thing instead of condoning people of power for with moral integrity problems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted December 19, 2012 Report Share Posted December 19, 2012 On 12/19/2012 at 12:05 PM, gstc82 said: well, once again, did WP officially said YSL fxxks others besides his wife? WP kept silent and YSL went MIA. That I the big difference. Did the PAP bashed WP abt it? Well, all pap said was to come clean and give the public an answer. YSL was sacked from WP not becos he an an affair hor. Neither was that woman involved asked to leave WP as all sides were basically silent even now.You got read the news or not? The woman from WP? You sure or not?? Who is WP to go tell anyone "officially" that YSL fxxked anyone? What talking you?? On 12/19/2012 at 12:14 PM, gstc82 said: hahaha, besides name calling n Intimidate what else u not do huh? You are telling us that it is ok for any political party and government to do "selective disclosure"? Seriously this is what you want? Another case of one set of rules for the PAP but opposition political party it's politicians "anything also can want lah". Typical.Who is doing "selective disclosure" now huh? What about Shanmugan's affair? Anything disclosed from your Favourite party then? On 12/19/2012 at 12:25 PM, gstc82 said: than r u a ghost? Are u not "someone"? Again use words like "ALL sides" and " Everyone", sure or not? U n your "guests" are silent (for now) its becos your bellowed WP and LTK screw up in its handling of YSL"s case by shutting out and non disclosures of what happens behind closed doors.Huh? You think PAP didn't screw up in handling Michael Palmer's case? If they didn't screw up, then they wouldn't have hired Michael in the first place. STUUUUPID! LOL! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gstc82 Posted December 20, 2012 Report Share Posted December 20, 2012 On 12/19/2012 at 6:47 PM, Guest said: You got read the news or not? The woman from WP? You sure or not?? Who is WP to go tell anyone "officially" that YSL fxxked anyone? What talking you??Who is doing "selective disclosure" now huh? What about Shanmugan's affair? Anything disclosed from your Favourite party then? Huh? You think PAP didn't screw up in handling Michael Palmer's case? If they didn't screw up, then they wouldn't have hired Michael in the first place. STUUUUPID! LOL!aiyo, dun cont to Lau kui xia suay lah. U kept on replying to a STUUUUPID person? Than u r a......? As what forest gump said... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simmon Posted December 20, 2012 Report Share Posted December 20, 2012 I dont think anyone would know if someone would have an affair. Besides, it's already mentioned that he was doing a great job as an MP. In that aspect, I think they didn't screw up when they hired Palmer. You can't judge a person by if they would have an affair if you were to hire them. It's something that cannot be expected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gstc82 Posted December 20, 2012 Report Share Posted December 20, 2012 On 12/19/2012 at 6:47 PM, Guest said: You got read the news or not? The woman from WP? You sure or not?? Who is WP to go tell anyone "officially" that YSL fxxked anyone? What talking you??Who is doing "selective disclosure" now huh? What about Shanmugan's affair? Anything disclosed from your Favourite party then? Huh? You think PAP didn't screw up in handling Michael Palmer's case? If they didn't screw up, then they wouldn't have hired Michael in the first place. STUUUUPID! LOL! thank you for once again proofing that some diehard oppie supporters expects one rule for pap but the rest can chin chai Lai one. U are a joker when u said who is WP to say YSL had an affair? Seriously? U mean to say that a major political party with 5MPs shd not disclose any "dirt" it's MPs do and hide it from us n its voters? Well like I said WP is silent. So much for your "first world parliament" hor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted December 20, 2012 Report Share Posted December 20, 2012 On 12/20/2012 at 12:10 AM, Simmon said: I dont think anyone would know if someone would have an affair. Besides, it's already mentioned that he was doing a great job as an MP. In that aspect, I think they didn't screw up when they hired Palmer. You can't judge a person by if they would have an affair if you were to hire them. It's something that cannot be expected.You're absolutely RIGHT about this.But, do you remember when WP YSL's affair was blown out in Feb, "WHO?!" started to criticize WP about "owe the voters an explanation" & "a fool-proof system to screen through their candidates before sending them for election" etc. etc. etc.The answer --- the one who fired the bullet shot his own leg now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gstc82 Posted December 20, 2012 Report Share Posted December 20, 2012 On 12/20/2012 at 12:22 AM, Guest said: You're absolutely RIGHT about this.But, do you remember when WP YSL's affair was blown out in Feb, "WHO?!" started to criticize WP about "owe the voters an explanation" & "a fool-proof system to screen through their candidates before sending them for election" etc. etc. etc.The answer --- the one who fired the bullet shot his own leg now. WP has yet to give anyone any explanation. WP did not even admit to YSL"a affair! WP being WP what I noticed is to give politically correct answers, just look at what they said abt the china drivers strike!wP is no longer a small political party hor. One rule for pap, the rest can chin chai Lai? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted December 20, 2012 Report Share Posted December 20, 2012 On 12/20/2012 at 12:55 AM, gstc82 said: WP has yet to give anyone any explanation. WP did not even admit to YSL"a affair! WP being WP what I noticed is to give politically correct answers, just look at what they said abt the china drivers strike!wP is no longer a small political party hor. One rule for pap, the rest can chin chai Lai?You really lived up to your reputation of your stupidity. If A & B are having an affair, is it for C to go admit it?? If YSL and the woman are having an affair, is it for WP to go and admit it? This is simple logic. And what have WP said about the China drivers' strike? The only statement that they had released is this: "This strike signals a failure in the labour dispute settlement process within SMRT....Our MPs will be asking the Government questions on this issue during the next sitting of Parliament." So what's wrong with that? And furthermore, on the same note, why don't you ask these guys as well: Ang Hin Kee, Charles Chong, Hawazi Daipi , Lim Siang Keat, Tay Teck Guan, Alvin Yeo. Do you even know who they are? Why are you keeping so quiet about the silence of PAP MPs? Are they from a "small" party now? It would seemed to be YOU who has one rule for PAP and a harsher set of rules for the rest.In case you are not aware, the salary of ONE PAP Minister already more than covers the total salary of ALL WP's MPs. So if you want me to lower my expectations of PAP, I won't object to that, as long as PAP is willing to lower their own salary accordingly. If you are paid 2 million dollar worth of salary, don't expect to deliver at the same level as that of a $200k salary. Simple logic... which naturally escapes STUUUUUUUPID people like you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gstc82 Posted December 20, 2012 Report Share Posted December 20, 2012 On 12/20/2012 at 1:24 AM, Guest said: You really lived up to your reputation of your stupidity. If A & B are having an affair, is it for C to go admit it?? If YSL and the woman are having an affair, is it for WP to go and admit it? This is simple logic. And what have WP said about the China drivers' strike? The only statement that they had released is this: "This strike signals a failure in the labour dispute settlement process within SMRT....Our MPs will be asking the Government questions on this issue during the next sitting of Parliament." So what's wrong with that? And furthermore, on the same note, why don't you ask these guys as well: Ang Hin Kee, Charles Chong, Hawazi Daipi , Lim Siang Keat, Tay Teck Guan, Alvin Yeo. Do you even know who they are? Why are you keeping so quiet about the silence of PAP MPs? Are they from a "small" party now? It would seemed to be YOU who has one rule for PAP and a harsher set of rules for the rest.In case you are not aware, the salary of ONE PAP Minister already more than covers the total salary of ALL WP's MPs. So if you want me to lower my expectations of PAP, I won't object to that, as long as PAP is willing to lower their own salary accordingly. If you are paid 2 million dollar worth of salary, don't expect to deliver at the same level as that of a $200k salary. Simple logic... which naturally escapes STUUUUUUUPID people like you. Aiyo, what was WP"s formula for minister"s salary? Pls study it before u comment la, dun know dun act smart. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted December 20, 2012 Report Share Posted December 20, 2012 On 12/20/2012 at 12:08 AM, gstc82 said: aiyo, dun cont to Lau kui xia suay lah. U kept on replying to a STUUUUPID person? Than u r a......? As what forest gump said...Please lah, I am the guest who called you LAU KUI XIA SUAY.Not the other guest who called you stuuuuuupid.LOLDon't point fingers at the wrong person hor.You are so stuuuuuupid, lau kui xia suay! :twisted: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gstc82 Posted December 20, 2012 Report Share Posted December 20, 2012 On 12/20/2012 at 2:47 AM, Guest said: Please lah, I am the guest who called you LAU KUI XIA SUAY.Not the other guest who called you stuuuuuupid.LOLDon't point fingers at the wrong person hor.You are so stuuuuuupid, lau kui xia suay! :twisted: lol, do read and understand carefully hor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted December 20, 2012 Report Share Posted December 20, 2012 On 12/20/2012 at 1:42 AM, gstc82 said: Aiyo, what was WP"s formula for minister"s salary? Pls study it before u comment la, dun know dun act smart.Don't siam here siam there. What has WP's formula for the Ministers' salary got to do with the Chinese drivers' strike? Regardless of the formula, as long as anyone dare to take a million dollar salary, then they had better be ready to deliver a million-dollar-salary job. Similarly, don't expect a person drawing 200k salary to deliver a 2 million dollar job. Stuuuuupid! You really lau kiu xia sway here on BW. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gstc82 Posted December 20, 2012 Report Share Posted December 20, 2012 On 12/20/2012 at 7:02 AM, Guest said: Don't siam here siam there. What has WP's formula for the Ministers' salary got to do with the Chinese drivers' strike? Regardless of the formula, as long as anyone dare to take a million dollar salary, then they had better be ready to deliver a million-dollar-salary job. Similarly, don't expect a person drawing 200k salary to deliver a 2 million dollar job. Stuuuuupid! You really lau kiu xia sway here on BW. Orh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neutral citizen Posted December 20, 2012 Report Share Posted December 20, 2012 Is the gstc82 some YPAP fellow whose identity got exposed some time back by sgboy n TRE? He said sth like he worked with Teo Ser Luck and finds him attractive??Can't remmber his name but just remembered he's being disliked...A word of advice to this gstc82 . No pt "fighting" so hard online n come across as being so detestable.. Given ur tainted n soiled reputation, PAP wun select u for any public position one... U just like a "tool" to them, smearing opponents n getting urself smeared also..While other hypocrites in ur party acts holy n get selected to run as MP. Lol.How does this arrangement benefits u?What do you think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted December 20, 2012 Report Share Posted December 20, 2012 On 12/20/2012 at 10:18 AM, neutral citizen said: Is the gstc82 some YPAP fellow whose identity got exposed some time back by sgboy n TRE? He said sth like he worked with Teo Ser Luck and finds him attractive??Can't remmber his name but just remembered he's being disliked...A word of advice to this gstc82 . No pt "fighting" so hard online n come across as being so detestable.. Given ur tainted n soiled reputation, PAP wun select u for any public position one... U just like a "tool" to them, smearing opponents n getting urself smeared also..While other hypocrites in ur party acts holy n get selected to run as MP. Lol.How does this arrangement benefits u?What do you think? :clap: :clap: :clap: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gstc82 Posted December 20, 2012 Report Share Posted December 20, 2012 On 12/20/2012 at 10:18 AM, neutral citizen said: Is the gstc82 some YPAP fellow whose identity got exposed some time back by sgboy n TRE? He said sth like he worked with Teo Ser Luck and finds him attractive??Can't remmber his name but just remembered he's being disliked...A word of advice to this gstc82 . No pt "fighting" so hard online n come across as being so detestable.. Given ur tainted n soiled reputation, PAP wun select u for any public position one... U just like a "tool" to them, smearing opponents n getting urself smeared also..While other hypocrites in ur party acts holy n get selected to run as MP. Lol.How does this arrangement benefits u?What do you think? I where got fight? N I m not a a pap member, ypap member( 2 old to be a " y"), a Safra member, an ntuc member, passion card or member to any govt or political clubs hor, neither did I take part in any " conversation" or " meet the people" session, took part in ndp, or any rally or met my mp hor. The only thing I was remotely associated was when I was 5 till 6 years old when I we t to the pap kindergarten in ghim moh. So please hor, if I m a pap member I will say it but I m not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted December 21, 2012 Report Share Posted December 21, 2012 On 12/20/2012 at 1:23 PM, gstc82 said: What do you think? I where got fight? N I m not a a pap member, ypap member( 2 old to be a " y"), a Safra member, an ntuc member, passion card or member to any govt or political clubs hor, neither did I take part in any " conversation" or " meet the people" session, took part in ndp, or any rally or met my mp hor. The only thing I was remotely associated was when I was 5 till 6 years old when I we t to the pap kindergarten in ghim moh. So please hor, if I m a pap member I will say it but I m not.Wow .... one tiny piece of bone given to a lap bitch decades ago can earn its support and loyalty for life. And better still, it can claim that it is not "fighting" when everyone can see that it is. Just what kind of drug did PAP put into that bone decades ago? Did the drug burn off its brain, or is it still in effect? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gstc82 Posted December 21, 2012 Report Share Posted December 21, 2012 On 12/21/2012 at 1:10 AM, Guest said: Wow .... one tiny piece of bone given to a lap bitch decades ago can earn its support and loyalty for life. And better still, it can claim that it is not "fighting" when everyone can see that it is. Just what kind of drug did PAP put into that bone decades ago? Did the drug burn off its brain, or is it still in effect? wah a rich kid here leh. Most children attend pap kindergarten than hor. Dun u know this? Lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted December 21, 2012 Report Share Posted December 21, 2012 On 12/21/2012 at 2:23 AM, gstc82 said: wah a rich kid here leh. Most children attend pap kindergarten than hor. Dun u know this? Lol.Ah boy ... sorry hor.... during my time hor, no such thing as PAP kindergarten. Stuuuupid! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gstc82 Posted December 21, 2012 Report Share Posted December 21, 2012 On 12/21/2012 at 9:35 AM, Guest said: Ah boy ... sorry hor.... during my time hor, no such thing as PAP kindergarten. Stuuuupid!orh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted January 14, 2013 Report Share Posted January 14, 2013 On 12/14/2012 at 3:48 PM, Guest said: How should WP respond? 1. Show the double standard of PAP between Palmer-gate and Yaw-gate2. Claim the moral high ground by by avoiding character assassination. Let voters see the stark contrast with how PAP fought HG BE by character-assassinating Png Eng Huat.3. Focus on national issues with occasional subtle reminders to voters on point 1 and 2. This will help to maintain consistency in WP's position.4. Stand firm and send Lee Lilian the candidate of GE2011 there to signal to the voters of her sincerity to represent them and that she didn't forsake them after GE2011. According to a top-level trusted source, it seems Lee Lilian has got the exposure there since 2011, and this BE will be a continuation of her long campaign to win over the hearts and minds in Punggol East. Wow, you are really accurate!WP did indeed field their superstar candidate Lee Lilian!Hope she wins! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted January 14, 2013 Report Share Posted January 14, 2013 On 1/14/2013 at 4:07 AM, Guest said: Wow, you are really accurate!WP did indeed field their superstar candidate Lee Lilian!Hope she wins!i think she's so spot on when highlighting the issues and summarising concerns of people living around Punggol East SMC area. It's as if she's one of us, going through the things we experiencing, together.Municipal issues1) Really need more kopitaim. Want to eat only got 1 choice within walking distance2) Transport is crap. Want to go other places especially army camps need so many transferNational issues1) Start family beri difficult Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest 永春门副帮主 Posted March 2, 2013 Report Share Posted March 2, 2013 News report dated 14 February 2013 Let's see. Yam Ah Mee announced to resign from PA at 1 October 2012 (Palmer-&-Lauer sexual affair exposed). He is joining Sembcrop at 16 April 2013. Wow...Yam Ah Mee taking 6months to move on to his next post! Very smart! :clap: Yam Ah Mee is diluting the attention from public, and people may thought that he resigns because his term at PA is up. Actually, who caused Yam Ah Mee to reign? Let readers judge. I am sorry Yam Ah Mee. Once a star in facebook, can't be forever a star. :hat: FSL019 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest -NS Man- Posted March 2, 2013 Report Share Posted March 2, 2013 Im sure mr yam is getting remunerated more than what he is getting at sembcorp than in PA. Anyway, everyone knows his 5 min moment of fame is just a fad - just like psy for gangnam style and the current red hot harlem shake. Mr yam enjoyed the attention from the public while it lasted and PA's profile has also increased as well - so his mission can be seen as accomplished. im looking forward to his contributions to sembcorp and make his mark there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest arowana Posted March 3, 2013 Report Share Posted March 3, 2013 (edited) Yam Ah Mee's New Job (April 2013) Edited March 3, 2013 by arowana Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts