Jump to content
Male HQ

InBangkok

Members
  • Posts

    2,254
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

InBangkok last won the day on September 22 2020

InBangkok had the most liked content!

About InBangkok

  • Birthday January 1

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Personal Interest

  • Interests
    Theatre, opera, classical concerts, some pop, swimming, lying on the beach, reading, quiet dinners for two with a nice bottle of wine, travel.
  • Looking For
    Conversation

Personal Information

  • Height
    173 cm
  • Weight
    87 kg
  • Relationship Status
    Prefer not to say
  • Role
    Prefer not to say

Recent Profile Visitors

1,814 profile views

InBangkok's Achievements

  1. Hahaha! This from the joker who has written oh so many times that he fills his posts with humour. He is a consistent liar and that has been proven for all to see. I have written many times that @Steve5380's way of posting is very simple for all to see. First he makes a statement. When a poster writes a contrary statement, he then doubles down and repeats his statement. If the second poster continues to state he is wrong, @Steve5380 can never come up with a cogent answer to prove his point. First he tells readers that he posts in jest - as if anyone believes that! Then if the second poster does not give up, he goes into his 79 year old's attack mode. The other poster's posts become "nonsense" and "rubbish" and the poster himself becomes a "scumbag", "a troll" and other such descriptions. When that does not work, out comes his big arsenal of lies. The poster is compared to a "cockroach", a "rat" and a "fruitfully". Of course he denies that he actually wrote that - but then he denies everything. He is the great Steve. The man who knows it all and who is never wrong. But the really funny thing is - he has twice posted that so many of his posts were wrong!! He admitted to his lies. Believe not a word!
  2. So the acknowledged liar who lied for months and months and months before admitting it is at it again. Does he not realise how crashingly boring he is? So childish. And it isn't his thread. As he wrote around 6 months ago, no thread belongs to any member! Want to see what you wrote @Steve5380? Wahahaha!
  3. Problem is that very few parents in Asia seem to pass on much information about sex other than it is how babies are made. Kids learn about it from schoolmates and friends. Too many of the older generations seem to be too embarrassed to talk about sex.
  4. @Steve5380 is such a obsessive liar. For months and months he called the posts I made which quoted his direct words from earlier posts all manner of lies, nonsense, rubbish and other silly childish comments. Now he has finally confessed that everything i wrote re his past posts was the truth. So much for all the lying! But @Steve5380 can never let go. @Steve5380 will never he is wrong. He just doubles down and doubles down no matter what rubbish he posts. And even with this one-of-a-kind admission of guilt, he cannot let go because he compares this poster to a cockroach, a rat and now a fruit fly. If it wasn't so pathetically childish, it would probably seem funny. Note in future that whenever @Steve5380calls something a lie, there is an extremely good chance it will in fact be the truth!
  5. @Steve5380 has the unusual ability not to recognise the truth when it stares him in the face. He has compared me to a cockroach, a rat and now a mentally disturbed patient - ONLY because I have written the truth. He clearly forgets that he lied and lied and lied for month after month after month calling the quotes I posted from his previous posts nonsense, lies and all manner of utter nonsense. And then what happened? He actually admitted finally that he had written the posts - Sadly therefore he has proved himself a congenital liar. In future all his posts should be read by all with this in mind.
  6. I saw Baryshnikov dance in New York. He was utterly stunning. And he looked much more of a male role model than Nureyev whom I saw in Giselle in Vienna. Nureyev's leg muscles were just too pronounced. Clearly he needed them for his amazing leaps but Baryshnikov was in my view better proportioned.
  7. So Biden was abominable when as President of the Senate he railroaded through the nomination of Justice Clarence Thomas when it came to his disgraceful Senate confirmation hearing. Biden later admitted he was wrong! And now one of the most rabid conservative right-wingers has been sitting on the Court for more than 30 years. Beware! Justice Thomas has stated that little is now sacred in the USA and that gay marriage could be next on the list. The Evangelicals and ultra-conservative right would love to see that struck down.
  8. I also object to those who speak particularly loudly, although it depends to a large extent where this happens. I was once in an airport lounge waiting for a flight to Hong Kong. Business class lounges are supposed to be areas of relative peace and quiet before getting on a flight. This arrogant guy - American by his accent - was talking on the phone to his office. He clearly worked in the financial industry because the entire lounge was made perfectly aware of which shares he wanted sold at which price - and so on. This went on for over 5 minutes and totally disturbed the peace in the lounge. Had he been more considerate, he could have walked outside and conducted his financial dealings without disturbing everyone. As can often happen with those who are never wrong, when another passenger went up to him to ask that he speak more quietly if he planned to make more phone calls, the arrogant b.....d said he had every right to do what he wished and f..k everyone else. Not even the lounge supervisor could do anything about him.
  9. Having denied these quotes of yours for many months, called them "nonsense" and I who posted them" trash" and likened me to a cockraoch and a rat, surprise! surprise! Now you completely agree that what I have written is entirely the truth. You now agree you wrote every single one of those posts. You are a total disgrace! But you don't regret them? Once Singaporeans read this and what you have written in the past about Singapore and how there is nothing you like about the city apart from the gay saunas you frequented, I wonder how much credibility they will give to your posts in future. Be careful what you write, Steve old man.
  10. Oh you are so funny - and so stupidly idiotic! So now you have added rat poison to your list of poisons. What don't you try spraying cockroach or rat poison down your throat and see what happens @Steve5380! I don't deny you your time in hospital. The fact is everyone knows what you intended. You wanted something like cockroach poison to keep away a poster from what you claimed was "your thread" when in fact it is the Moderator's thread. You regard yourself as always right when many times you are completely wrong. And you wanted to divert attention away from quotations made from your own posts which show up your real self - a bitter, old man who doesn't like Singapore, who doesn't like posts made in this forum in Chinese and who is stuck most days in his room with occasional visits to the gym and the grocery store.
  11. Totally factual and the posts are up in BW for all to see. Sad, I suppose, that old @Steve5380 stuck in his Herman Miller chair watching youtube and all manner of videos to post here on BW deliberately denies that he ever wrote posts he actually wrote and calls them ridiculous. Well, more than a few were indeed totally ridiculous as have been others. A friend at the gym who had just returned from mountaineering in the Himalayas in Burma? Huh? Even when @Steve5380 corrected that to Nepal, mountaineering was not permitted by the Nepalese government when this friend was supposedly there! True or false? The delicious chocolate mousse on the observation deck of Taipei 101 when the only eateries were expensive Chinese restaurants and he has written several times that he does not visit restaurants, and certainly not expensive ones. Now descending to the depths of wanting to find the equivalent of cockroach poison to get rid of another poster. For what? Because that poster only posts the truth about what he has written? I suppose that comes from being lonely stuck in your room almost the entire day, every day of the week and being wedded to BW to find posters who do not agree with him and then trashing them and their contributions. This from a man who lives 16,000 kms away and has stated on BW he does not even like Singapore apart from the gay saunas in which he spent all his time. Another quote from his own words, "I visited often because I like Singapore gays and I was attracted to Towel Club, Absolute, some of One-Seven, some of Cruise Club ... and practically nothing else." I wonder what Singaporeans feel about this? Why is someone who does not actually like Singapore continue to post here? He even objected to posts being made in Chinese!!! In 2020 he wrote, "I am critical of the abundant posts in Chinese." Huh? He had to gall to write this in a Singapore forum? And all this from a poster who wrote (yes, another of his actual quotations!) - "I feel I am a role model in many aspects of my life." Someone who lies continuously is "such a role model?" That is just pathetic, old Steve! So from now on my posts will end with another of @Steve5380's claims from 2020 - "It's so fortunate that I am flexible and not argumentative at all."
  12. After the way you have trashed @singalion so many times, I take it this is one of the posts you consider funny! He's no doubt enjoying life rather than sitting in one room watching TVs all day.
  13. Happiness? Wahahaha! This from a poster who has recently suggested a poster be poisoned like rats with poison. A poster who regularly calls other poster's contributions "nonsense" and the posters themselves "scumbags" "trolls" "shameless" and other stupid childish rubbish. An angry old man of 79 who cannot disguise that when he says he is calm and happy, he is in fact neurotic and unable to accept criticism.
  14. So the 79 year old poster who wants to use something similar to cockroach poison on posters who on do not agree with him still does not respond to written quotes from his own previous posts apart from claiming it is all "nonsense". But @Steve5380 you know perfectly well that the posts I have quoted from your previous posts are totally true. Not one is "nonsense"! You wrote them. It is just that they are embarrassing for you and so you deny that you ever made them. @Steve5380cannot bear the fact that he may be wrong. And that he has been wrong many times. So he then goes ballistic. Let's recall yet more of his tactics other than merely trashing posters and calling what they post of his previous posts "Nonsense". To justify his lies, he writes - as he did in December 2020, "I remember reading more than once . . ." That was a lie. his memory was faulty as you might expect from a 79 year old. Next, he amplifies this rubbish by writing in the same post "Anyone remembering what I remember would assume . . ." Err, what? So @Steve5380's memory is faulty and he then uses that to "assume" that what he then writes must be correct! Idiotic and untruthful in the extreme. As for trashing posters, time to recall what he has written of others' contributions - January 2020 - "More irrational scum" February 2020 - "Nothing but more bullshit" April 2020 - "You are such a mserable troll and fantasize" Other common @Steve5380comments are "lunatic scumbag", "you are a poor and failed old man", "you are so ridiculous", "pure shameless nonsense", "you are mentally handicapped". And in response to a detailed analysis of the Taiwan situation I posted, the only contribution he could write since he knows nothing about the history was "Blah ... blah ...blah ..." Let's remember, too, that he has trashed those in a full-time monogamous relationship. Although he claimed many times he loved his partner dearly, he happily flew all the way to Asia annually to spend all his time in gay saunas claiming that open relationships are the norm for gay men. His actual words written in 2016? "Many closed relationships are pure selfishness." "SELFISHNESS?" What do those in monogamous relationships say to that, I wonder? All this from a 79 year old old man who claims he is always calm and does not get angry. Wahahahaha! Given all the above that's such a joke. And in this thread, he promotes quack theories that have never been proved. 5-day water fasts. As I have asked in this thread many times, has any reader/member of BW ever gone on a 5-day water fast, especially younger ones who, as @Steve5380 rather stupidly writes in the thread heading, "will be seniors one day." Apart from those who sadly die beforehand, everyone will one day be a senior. Although if they go on water fasts younger in their lives, the chances are they will end up in hospital and spend a lot of cash recovering their health. He even suggests above that because a video has had 2 million views, that validates what it promotes. Rubbish! I put it to other posters and readers. Which would you prefer as you age? To sit alone in basically one room all day and virtually everyday with two large tv screens watching youtube, with a constant diet mostly of beans and lentils, eating your lunch while watching television (as he wrote in a post) with just trips to the gym a few mornings a week and an occasional visit to the supermarket to take advantage of cheap promotions. No friends apart from those at the gym (including one who allegedly went mountaineering in the Himalayas at a time of year before the Nepal government issues mountaineering permits! How did he manage that, I wonder? Impossible!}, no one coming to visit, no coffees or other trips outside the home to socialise with friends. Alternatively would you prefer having a partner (if possible), enjoying a good social life by going out regularly or having close friends round to your home to chat, laugh, commiserate etc. with you, eating a variety of foods and having an occasional drink. Is that not far more likely to make your life as a senior vastly more enjoyable?
  15. I'm not going to discuss this further since we have totally opposite viewpoints. All I will say is that I work in a people business and I spend some of my time trying to assess character and at other if what I am being told is a correct version of events. I was not at the Thomas hearings. I merely watched them closely on television. I do not believe you did - if wrong, then i sincerely apologise. In my view, everything Thomas said and in his demeanour pointed to his being guilty of being a sexual predator in the case of Ms. Anita Hill. My last point is that you have to factor in the entire Supreme Court background in the years leading up to the Thomas hearings. An earlier nomination by President Reagan of the ultra right wing Robert Bork had failed in the Senate. It was felt he was far too ready to roll back civl rights legislation. Ultra conservatives were furious! The first vacancy during Reagans's predecessor's tenure was to replace William Brennan. While Bush wanted a strong conservative like Thomas, his staff persuaded him otherwise and Judge David Souter was appointed. But conservatives were yet again furious. So Bush promised that the next nomination would be a die-hard conservative. Very unusually, Thomas was nominated even though his experience as a top judge was extremely limited. Bush's comment that thomas was "the best man for the job" was widely ridiculed. Thomas would also be replacing an icon of the civil rights movement. Again Bush's Attorney General warned him that Thomas was the wrong candidate at the wrong time. Thomas was outspokenly critical of affirmative action and known to be equally critical of the abortion Law Roe v. Wade. But against all arguments, Bush pushed for Thomas. He ended up with die-hard conservative he wanted and a man who has hardly spoken publicly in the 31 years he has been on the Supreme Court. He is also a sexual predator in my view. I will make no more comments.
×
×
  • Create New...