Singapore Local Gay News [LGBT Related News] (Compiled)

[Guest I think]

14 minutes ago, singalion said:

 

The urine test or others test will determine whether the attendants took drugs or not. There will be only prosecution if drugs were found in the urine. 

 

Those who attended but for whom the outcome of the urine test confirms they didn't take drugs won't be charged. 

 

Attending a sex orgy party (without taking drugs) is not a crime. 

 

Awareness that drugs will be consumed might be present depending on the invitation, flyers or message exchange with the hosts or other participants. 

 

The media reports indicated that there was an invite. I m sure the CNB and police knows the relevant buzz word indicating drugs. 

 

 

 

They can't charge them without first determining first their intentions and contexts surrounding the drug consumptions.

 

I mean, going to the party with the awareness and intention to do drugs and being unaware but succumbed to peer pressure are very different scenarios that cannot be dealt with similarly.

 

Likewise for first time and repeat offenders.

 

If the situation is complex and undeterminable, I think all will be given stern warnings.

 

For someone to be charged in court, the criminal intent has to be very clear.

[singalion]

The 12 August 2023 media article already contradicts what some Guest person claims here: 

 

Quote: 

 

49 men arrested in Sentosa hotel villa after drug raid

12 Aug 2023 10:08AM

 

CNB declined to disclose at which hotel the incident took place. It said investigations into the drug activities of all the suspects are ongoing.

 

=> investigations of all suspects have been initiated by CNB. 

 

 

[Guest I think]

23 minutes ago, singalion said:

 

The urine test or others test will determine whether the attendants took drugs or not. There will be only prosecution if drugs were found in the urine. 

 

Those who attended but for whom the outcome of the urine test confirms they didn't take drugs won't be charged. 

 

Attending a sex orgy party (without taking drugs) is not a crime. 

 

Awareness that drugs will be consumed might be present depending on the invitation, flyers or message exchange with the hosts or other participants. 

 

The media reports indicated that there was an invite. I m sure the CNB and police knows the relevant buzz word indicating drugs. 

 

If the defence will work that attendants weren't aware on drug consumption or drinks were drug laced without their knowledge has to be seen. 

 

That's what the science says:

 

In general, the detection time is longest in hair, followed by urine and oral fluid. Drugs in hair may be detectable for up to 90 days, whereas drugs in urine are generally detectable for one to seven days (or longer in chronic users)

 

Surely, the authories will do various tests on the suspects...

 

Not sure about saliva, but they cannot be charged in court by drug detection in hair. Only urine test can determine that.

 

Otherwise, second hand drugs in the hair of people who walked pass or hung around drug takers causing them to be jailed will be overkill!

[singalion]

8 minutes ago, Guest I think said:

 

They can't charge them without first determining first their intentions and contexts surrounding the drug consumptions.

 

I mean, going to the party with the awareness and intention to do drugs and being unaware but succumbed to peer pressure are very different scenarios that cannot be dealt with similarly.

 

Likewise for first time and repeat offenders.

 

If the situation is complex and undeterminable, I think all will be given stern warnings.

 

For someone to be charged in court, the criminal intent has to be very clear.

 

The drug offences is Singapore work with presumptions. The intention is not relevant. 

 

The assumption of innocence is also reversed, which means the suspected person having consumed drugs must prove his innocence. 

 

 

 

That might be a difficult task or impossible. 

 

Presumptions relating to consumption

Sec 22 of the Misuse of Drugs Act stipulates if a controlled drug is found in the tested urine samples of a person, the person is presumed to have consumed that controlled drug, until the contrary is proven.

Quote end. 

 

 

For first time offenders anyhow the law provides a special treatment. Please read at CNB's website. 

 

 

 

[singalion]

6 minutes ago, Guest I think said:

Not sure about saliva, but they cannot be charged in court by drug detection in hair. Only urine test can determine that.

 

Otherwise, second hand drugs in the hair of people who walked pass or hung around drug takers causing them to be jailed will be overkill!

 

Here on the test. The law refers to "or" meaning both test are valid. 

 

 

If a person is suspected of having consumed controlled or specified drugs, that person may be required to provide a urine or hair sample for testing under sec 31(2) and sec 31A.

Failure to provide a sample is an offence

 

[singalion]

22 minutes ago, Guest I think said:

They can't charge them without first determining first their intentions and contexts surrounding the drug consumptions.

 

I mean, going to the party with the awareness and intention to do drugs and being unaware but succumbed to peer pressure are very different scenarios that cannot be dealt with similarly.

 

 

As earlier said, the excuse of having been unaware has little chances to succeed:

 

Quote:

Section 22: Presumption Of Drug Consumption

Similar to drug possessions, there are also presumptions relating to consumption.

The first is outlined under Section 22 of the Misuse of Drugs Act, which states that if a controlled drug is detected in a person’s urine, they are presumed to have illegally consumed it.

Once again, the burden of proving innocence falls on the accused. Any reasoning or excuse, like: “I wasn’t aware that the brownies my friend gave me were laced with cannabis”, is not likely to be accepted by the Courts.

 

[Guest I think]

35 minutes ago, singalion said:

 

The drug offences is Singapore work with presumptions. The intention is not relevant. 

 

The assumption of innocence is also reversed, which means the suspected person having consumed drugs must prove his innocence. 

 

 

 

That might be a difficult task or impossible. 

 

Presumptions relating to consumption

Sec 22 of the Misuse of Drugs Act stipulates if a controlled drug is found in the tested urine samples of a person, the person is presumed to have consumed that controlled drug, until the contrary is proven.

Quote end. 

 

 

For first time offenders anyhow the law provides a special treatment. Please read at CNB's website. 

 

 

 

The defense will be accidental or unintentional consumption. Drinks were passed around. Some wouldn't know better. Some may be drugged by unscrupulous people who wanted to make them high for sex lol.

 

I think intention for drug consumption, but what you stated more for drug trafficking. I could be wrong.

 

That statuette already included the "unless" part. That means whether to be charged, still depends on intention and contexts of consumption. Otherwise, many people who did not intend to consume drugs, but consumed them unknowingly or accidentally will be charged.

 

Maybe someone drank the spiked drink because of thirst after dancing or orgy, he was in an intoxicated state from alcohol consumption, unaware the drink was spiked and no other drinks were available nearby at that time? 

 

That's why if the intention and contexts are unclear, people are usually given stern warnings.

 

They will apply the law more strictly for repeat offenders, who were already established to have the intent before in prior cases.

 

They will also look at the overall profile of the party attendees, if they have prior criminal records, etc.

 

[Guest I think]

45 minutes ago, singalion said:

 

Here on the test. The law refers to "or" meaning both test are valid. 

 

 

If a person is suspected of having consumed controlled or specified drugs, that person may be required to provide a urine or hair sample for testing under sec 31(2) and sec 31A.

Failure to provide a sample is an offence

 

Yes but to be charged in court requires a positive urine test, the hair test is just for reference and cannot be used to charge in court.

 

Otherwise, marijuana traces in your hair from your buddy blowing smoke in your hair can land you in jail.

[Guest I think]

50 minutes ago, singalion said:

 

Here on the test. The law refers to "or" meaning both test are valid. 

 

 

If a person is suspected of having consumed controlled or specified drugs, that person may be required to provide a urine or hair sample for testing under sec 31(2) and sec 31A.

Failure to provide a sample is an offence

 

They will test your hair if they suspect you took drugs more than 2 weeks ago, but a positive hair test alone cannot be used to charge you in court.

[Guest I think]

1 hour ago, singalion said:

 

As earlier said, the excuse of having been unaware has little chances to succeed:

 

Quote:

Section 22: Presumption Of Drug Consumption

Similar to drug possessions, there are also presumptions relating to consumption.

The first is outlined under Section 22 of the Misuse of Drugs Act, which states that if a controlled drug is detected in a person’s urine, they are presumed to have illegally consumed it.

Once again, the burden of proving innocence falls on the accused. Any reasoning or excuse, like: “I wasn’t aware that the brownies my friend gave me were laced with cannabis”, is not likely to be accepted by the Courts.

 

Then they need to substantiate their claim of unawareness by demonstrating their trust in that friend beforehand and getting testimonials from people who were shortchanged and know that friend better.

[Guest I think]

1 hour ago, singalion said:

 

As earlier said, the excuse of having been unaware has little chances to succeed:

 

Quote:

Section 22: Presumption Of Drug Consumption

Similar to drug possessions, there are also presumptions relating to consumption.

The first is outlined under Section 22 of the Misuse of Drugs Act, which states that if a controlled drug is detected in a person’s urine, they are presumed to have illegally consumed it.

Once again, the burden of proving innocence falls on the accused. Any reasoning or excuse, like: “I wasn’t aware that the brownies my friend gave me were laced with cannabis”, is not likely to be accepted by the Courts.

 

Get also testimonials from people who had known you for a very long time and know you very well to expound on the fact that you have always displayed a strong and clear aversion to drugs.

[Guest Know nothing]

5 hours ago, singalion said:

 

As earlier said, the excuse of having been unaware has little chances to succeed:

 

Quote:

Section 22: Presumption Of Drug Consumption

Similar to drug possessions, there are also presumptions relating to consumption.

The first is outlined under Section 22 of the Misuse of Drugs Act, which states that if a controlled drug is detected in a person’s urine, they are presumed to have illegally consumed it.

Once again, the burden of proving innocence falls on the accused. Any reasoning or excuse, like: “I wasn’t aware that the brownies my friend gave me were laced with cannabis”, is not likely to be accepted by the Courts.

 

wow, you can Google but still know nothing about the realities of what has happened with this case. 

 

i really wonder where this endless need to keep posting to try and prove you are right comes from? 

[Guest Borrrred]

Hmm, interesting debate. If I were the police, I would be more interested in who brought in the drugs in the first place. As for those whose urine are positive, there will be rehab for sure, its the same for those who returned from bkk and tested positive, its sg law. The lucky ones that will be be given stern warnings are those whose urine was tested negative. Moral of the story, avoid such big parties, if really want to, don't drink anything.

[Guest Yucks]

13 hours ago, singalion said:

The 12 August 2023 media article already contradicts what some Guest person claims here: 

 

Quote: 

 

49 men arrested in Sentosa hotel villa after drug raid

12 Aug 2023 10:08AM

 

CNB declined to disclose at which hotel the incident took place. It said investigations into the drug activities of all the suspects are ongoing.

 

=> investigations of all suspects have been initiated by CNB. 

 

 

Yes all were being investigated, that’s of course right? If not, why were they being detained? Fact is most cases are already concluded. No one is down playing the severity, it’s just the truth.

 

You know nothing and like to assume. Just stop posting something that you have no knowledge of.

[singalion]

Fact is that the media did not report on every one each involved in the Covid party, ( = 32 others) but just the two co host, why should the media do it in the Sentosa case?

 

This means the cases of each won't be known. Sure anyone can take the effort and read every judgment from the criminal courts...

 

 

[Guest Know nothing]

10 hours ago, singalion said:

Fact is that the media did not report on every one each involved in the Covid party, ( = 32 others) but just the two co host, why should the media do it in the Sentosa case?

 

This means the cases of each won't be known. Sure anyone can take the effort and read every judgment from the criminal courts...

 

 

still desperately trying to have the last word…. With no actual knowledge 

[Guest Guest]

@singalion If you have no knowledge of a topic and do not have any first hand info, it's better to just keep quiet. You think.....you assume.....it's just making you look real bad.

[Guest Oh...]

So negative urine test = stern warning

 

First time positive urine test = rehab

 

Second time positive = jail?

 

That's their current playback?

[Guest Oh...]

Just now, Guest Oh... said:

So negative urine test = stern warning

 

First time positive urine test = rehab

 

Second time positive = jail?

 

That's their current playback?

*playbook

[singalion]

Man with mpox symptoms breached quarantine, gets jail

During quarantine, the man had four visitors within about 14 hours.

 

CNA 23 Jul 2024

 

 

SINGAPORE: Despite being placed under quarantine for being a close contact of a mpox case, a man breached the terms of his quarantine by having four men over separately for intimate relations within about half a day.

 

He developed symptoms of mpox - an infectious disease that spread from Africa to other parts of the world in an outbreak in May 2022, including Singapore.

 

The diseases was previously known as "monkeypox" and the term was phased out by the World Health Organization in November 2022.

 

After testing positive for mpox following a rash on his thigh, the man was isolated at the National Centre for Infectious Diseases (NCID) and taken to a hotel to be isolated.

 

However, he left the hotel and a search party was sent out for him.

 

Kelvin Low Zi Jian, a 27-year-old Malaysian man, was sentenced to 14 weeks' jail on Monday (Jul 22) for his actions.

 

He pleaded guilty to three counts under the Infectious Diseases Act for breaching his quarantine or isolation terms, with another five charges taken into consideration.

 

THE 2022 MPOX OUTBREAK

The court heard that mpox mainly occurred in Africa before 2022.

 

It is typically a self-limiting and mild illness, but vulnerable people like pregnant women, young children or immunocompromised people can suffer serious complications or even death.

 

Symptoms include a skin rash, fever, headache and body aches and swollen lymph nodes.

 

Since an outbreak in May 2022, mpox cases and clusters have been reported in various countries including Singapore.

In July 2022, the WHO declared the ongoing outbreak of mpox to be a public health emergency of international concern.

 

Mpox can spread between humans through bodily fluids, skin lesions or internal mucosal surfaces like the mouth or throat. The virus can also spread from animals to humans.

 

According to the prosecution, data suggests that the mode of transmission in the 2022 outbreak was predominantly via close physical or prolonged contact, and most cases were identified in people who reported intimate and sexual contact with infected people.

 

"Persons engaging in high-risk sexual behaviour, such as having multiple or casual sexual partners, are most at risk of infection in the context of the 2022 outbreak," said the prosecutor.

 

Because of the 2022 outbreak, mpox was listed in Singapore's Infectious Diseases Act from June 2022.

LOW'S CASE

On Aug 3, 2022, Low received a message from the Ministry of Health (MOH) identifying him as a close contact of a mpox case.

 

A member of MOH's Health Alert Task Group called Low to ask if he could serve his quarantine at home, and Low confirmed that he was staying alone.

 

The MOH representative told Low that he could be quarantined at home, but he could not leave the unit and could not have any visitors.

 

If the rubbish chute was outside his unit, he could throw away his trash only after midnight.

 

Low acknowledged the conditions. He had previously told the Health Alert Task Group that he had a rash on his left knee, and added during the call that he was unsure if the rash was a symptom of mpox.

 

That same night, an electronic quarantine order was issued to Low via SMS, informing him to remain isolated at the unit in an enclosed room from Aug 3, 2022 to Aug 15, 2022.

 

The order stated that Low must not leave his home for any reason, including buying groceries or going for a walk, and that he must not have any visitors.

 

It stated that non-compliance with any of the conditions was an offence.

 

Soon after receiving the order, Low went on a dating application and reconnected with a person named in court documents only as A1.

 

A1 visited Low's unit that night and they kissed and caressed for about 15 minutes.

 

After he left, another man, named as A2, arrived at Low's unit. Low had been dating A2 for about four months, and A2 went over on Low's request.

 

They chatted before being intimate. After about one-and-a-half hours, they left the unit and went to a nearby petrol kiosk.

 

Low did not tell A2 that he was under an electronic quarantine order, and A2 would not have visited if he had known about it, the court heard.

 

That same night, Low texted another man, A3. They knew each other through Telegram in mid-July 2022 when A3 messaged Low about a shirt Low was selling.

 

Low asked A3 if he still wanted to buy the shirt. He offered to pay for A3's private-hire ride to Low's home.

 

A3 agreed and arrived at Low's home at about 12.46am on Aug 4, 2022.

 

Low proposed having sex and A3 left the unit at about 7am, after about six-and-a-half hours there.

 

About three hours later, a fourth man, named as A5, visited Low. They talked, hugged and kissed and A5 left after about 1 hour and 40 minutes.

 

After he left, A3 returned to the unit to retrieve his belongings.

 

TESTED POSITIVE FOR MPOX

The next day, on Aug 5, 2022, Low noticed he had a rash on his right thigh. Suspecting he had mpox, he reported it to MOH officials and was taken to NCID for testing.

 

He was confirmed to have mpox that afternoon and was isolated before being taken to Village Hotel Albert Court.

 

He was told to isolate there, receiving a phone call about it and another electronic order. The order stated that he had to be isolated in the hotel room until MOH gave him a memo that he could cease isolation.

 

Low acknowledged the order and signed it. MOH caught wind of Low's breaches of quarantine, with officials from the Health Alert Task Group heading down to the hotel on Aug 8, 2022 to issue Low a warning letter.

 

However, Low refused to sign the warning letter and the officials left.

 

About 15 minutes after the officials left, Low breached his isolation order and left the hotel.

 

The officials and hotel employees searched for Low, and the police were activated to find him.

 

When contacted, Low said he would return to the hotel. A hotel employee chanced upon Low at 4.30pm and scolded him, saying there was a search party out for him.

 

Low had been walking outside for over an hour, with a mask on, before returning to the hotel, where the police interviewed him.

 

During investigations, Low admitted that he had met A2 and A3 to have sex and discuss his personal problems. A2 and A3 did not contract mpox, but A3 was placed under quarantine because he visited Low.

 

The prosecutor sought 26 weeks' jail for Low, saying he had engaged in physically intimate acts with his visitors, which was particularly risky given that mpox is spread through physical contact.

 

By engaging in those acts without telling them he had been quarantined, Low had "robbed them of the opportunity to decline and protect themselves", said the prosecutor.

 

She said the visitors faced a "real risk" given that Low later tested positive for mpox, but acknowledged that it was not confirmed at the time he had visitors over.

 

MITIGATION

Defence lawyer Ms Shehzhadee Abdul Rahman from Shehzhadee Law Corporation sought a fine or not more than three weeks' jail instead.

 

She said her client was in Singapore on a work permit and has been working here for the past six years.

 

He was orphaned at the age of 17 after his father died and relocated to Singapore temporarily to work and provide for his family in Malaysia, said Ms Shehzhadee.

 

She said mpox was "practically unheard of in Singapore" at the time and it was not as widely reported or understood.

 

The case is unprecedented in terms of quarantine order offences for mpox, said the lawyer, asking for the sentence to be "carefully calibrated" as mpox causes significantly less harm than COVID-19.

 

Recent cases of breaching quarantine orders have been linked to COVID-19, which is categorised as a dangerous infectious disease, while mpox is a regular infectious disease.

 

Citing a report by MOH and NCID, Ms Shehzhadee said there were only 21 reported mpox cases in Singapore between May 2022 and Jan 17, 2023, and no more than 76 deaths worldwide.

 

The lawyer added that her client had left the hotel room as he was experiencing panic attacks from being isolated for two days and the thought of criminal proceedings.

 

He left the room to "clear his head and regulate his breathing" and returned to it, said the lawyer.

 

Low will begin his jail term after completing an unrelated imprisonment term of one year for a drug offence.

 

https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/monkeypox-mpox-symptoms-man-breach-quarantine-jail-4498066

[singalion]

 

Man charged over touching women inappropriately at Sentosa; others face separate molestation charges

JUL 18, 2024, 

 

...

 

The third senior citizen, Gerald Chai Meng Seng, 63, is accused of molesting a 16-year-old boy inside a toilet cubicle at Delta Swimming Complex in Tiong Bahru Road on May 9 at around 1.45pm.

 

...

 

 

 

 

 

[Guest Guest]

On 7/24/2024 at 11:50 PM, singalion said:

 

Man charged over touching women inappropriately at Sentosa; others face separate molestation charges

JUL 18, 2024, 

 

...

 

The third senior citizen, Gerald Chai Meng Seng, 63, is accused of molesting a 16-year-old boy inside a toilet cubicle at Delta Swimming Complex in Tiong Bahru Road on May 9 at around 1.45pm.

 

So old. Like grandfather molesting grandson like that.

[thickhead79]

SINGAPORE - He was just 17 years old in May 2021 when he started using his mobile phone to record images of male victims in public toilets.

By December that year, he had captured 97 images of 28 unidentified victims before he was caught red-handed by one of the victims and arrested.

The offender, now 20, was sentenced to 18 months’ probation on Aug 22 after he pleaded guilty to two voyeurism charges.

According to the prosecution, he did not target specific victims, and had “recorded the images to experience the thrill of doing so”.

[singalion]

Shop theft problem persists in first half of 2024; more outrage of modesty cases at shopping centres

Aug 23, 2024

 

...

 

Voyeurism cases increased from 229 cases to 257 cases, with the top three locations also being residential premises (78 cases), shopping complexes (44 cases) and the public transport network (27 cases).

A worrying trend was noticed at sports and swimming complexes, with 11 voyeurism cases in the first half 2024, as compared to one case during the same period in 2023.

 

 

Better watch out here!

[thickhead79]

SINGAPORE - A man invited two children, aged eight and 11, living in the same block as him to his home and touched them inappropriately on multiple occasions.

He also filmed the eight-year-old while doing an indecent act on the child.

The 22-year-old Singaporean pleaded guilty on Nov 19 to two charges of sexually exploiting a child and one charge of possessing obscene films.

Two other charges of producing child sexual abuse material and possessing obscene photographs will be taken into consideration for his sentencing.

Deputy Public Prosecutor Melissa Heng told the court that the man was 20 when he committed the acts and cannot be named as it may lead to the identification of the victims.

[QinWei]

Actually why the need to form/join telegrm?

 

upon sharing of materials, u are leading on a path of showing evidence

 

https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/man-who-was-administrator-chat-groups-shared-child-abuse-material-jailed-caned-4961541?cid=FBcna&fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR2GbTqph2djU8iZmosYr0vA2neX9uQNAFvTTyT9Pc5UcpB3hZnlNKLbpsU_aem_IwDCJUcbiX13Vl0I_U-bJw

 

[QinWei]

What a godfather

https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/man-who-was-father-figure-molested-godson-7-years-found-guilty-court-5000516?cid=FBcna&fbclid=IwY2xjawJBB4RleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHQyO58RZlV4N500FgUlqF1Et2FCIdttDsS0muHDf_7vcUQ_TCKtMdYV04g_aem_Qpptd52CzsCRPz51xftTaw

[sphere]

Former hospital worker who molested male patient gets 15 months’ jail

Danisha Nur Delisa Dewa, 36, was sentenced to 15 months’ jail.ST PHOTO: KELVIN CHNG

SINGAPORE – A basic care assistant at Ng Teng Fong General Hospital (NTFGH) in Jurong was at work in 2023 when he molested a 23-year-old male patient.

 

Danisha Nur Delisa Dewa, who is no longer working for NTFGH after completing his employment contract, had pressed the man’s private parts while the victim was wearing a hospital gown.

 

The 36-year-old Singaporean offender was convicted of a molestation charge after a trial, and was on March 14 sentenced to 15 months’ jail.

 

Before handing out the sentence, Principal District Judge Lee Lit Cheng said that caning was not imposed in the case as it did not involve skin to skin contact.

 

However, she stressed that Danisha had abused his position at the hospital and exploited his healthcare role.

 

In earlier proceedings, Deputy Public Prosecutor Ethan Lee told Judge Lee that the victim had been diagnosed with os acromiale, a condition in which a part of the shoulder blade fails to fully fuse during development. This results in a separate bone segment, causing weakness, pain or discomfort.

 

The man was then slated to undergo surgery to address this condition.

 

In the late morning of Jan 27, 2023, he arrived at NTFGH and was taken to a recliner chair.

 

He put on a hospital gown and a pair of disposable underwear, before a nurse checked his blood pressure.

 

Danisha woke him up sometime in the afternoon.

 

The DPP said: “The accused made small talk with him and asked the victim if the victim wanted to recline his chair. The victim said yes.

 

“The accused then asked the victim if he was wearing underwear. Before the victim could respond, the accused lifted the victim’s hospital gown to check for himself. The victim initially thought this was part of normal hospital procedure.”

 

After that, Danisha reclined the victim’s chair and closed the curtain fully around it.

 

He placed a blood pressure band around the victim’s right arm and started a blood pressure machine.

 

The prosecutor said that that while the machine was running, Danisha used his fingers to press on the victim’s private parts over the hospital gown, and asked the younger man if he was feeling any pain.

 

The victim said no.

 

Court documents stated that the victim initially thought that what Danisha had done was part of normal procedure.

 

He later recalled that nurses who had previously taken his blood pressure never pressed on his genitals.

 

The victim was making his way towards a station nurse when another nurse, who said she was from the operating theatre, approached him.

 

He told the operating theatre nurse about what had happened and the woman brought the station nurse to speak to him.

 

The station nurse then told him the act of pressing on his genitalia was not part of normal hospital procedure.

 

The station nurse also told the man not to worry, and he went for his surgery.

 

Defence lawyer Teo Choo Kee represented Danisha, who denied molesting the victim.

 

Danisha who had said that he is a member of the LGBTQ community, also claimed that the victim made up the allegation against him and that the younger man was homophobic.

 

For molestation, an offender can be jailed for up to three years, fined, caned or receive any combination of such punishments.

• Shaffiq Alkhatib is The Straits Times’ court correspondent, covering mainly criminal cases heard at the State Courts.

 

[article source: here]

 

[IcarusCQC]

On 6/4/2025 at 2:05 PM, singalion said:

 

I wouldn't exclude that something like this cannot happen between two gays...

There are plenty of serious drama queens in the gay community... 

and some who think after first fun you are already in a relationship... 

 

Now with 377A abolished, such alleged sexual assault cases between guys might also get into the news sooner or later. 

 

 

This type of thing has been around forever. it's usually molest or pedophilia. 

 

Jail for 2 men who engaged in sex acts with 15-year-old boys | The Straits Times

 

just an example.

[thejuicetiger]

8 minutes ago, IcarusCQC said:

This type of thing has been around forever. it's usually molest or pedophilia. 

 

Jail for 2 men who engaged in sex acts with 15-year-old boys | The Straits Times

 

just an example.

 

And worse, they did not use rubber? Seriously...

[IcarusCQC]

They are either not concerned or they already have something.

[singalion]

On 6/5/2025 at 4:50 PM, IcarusCQC said:

This type of thing has been around forever. it's usually molest or pedophilia. 

 

Jail for 2 men who engaged in sex acts with 15-year-old boys | The Straits Times

 

just an example.

 

Not sure it refers to pedophilia. 

 

We don't know the details really. 

 

The both older guys might be into boys, I think I still would place pedophile guys looking for those younger (who might not have developed their genitals or getting an erection) eventually below 15years and younger. 

 

First, when guys are on Grindr, you expect them to be 18y. 

From a former case the duty is on you to verify their age before engaging with anything. 

 

The first one knew their age. The charge is even higher when they engage them like MBs and pay for services. 

 

The second assumed the boy is above 18 but didn't check (but stupidly admitted that he felt him being younger than 18).  

 

On the other hand, while the law intends to protect those below 18y, this group between 16 to 18 often knows how to play those older guys and entice them into fun. Often they intend to buy certain gadgets don't have the money and then sell their body for money and sex acts. 

 

I would leave my hands off and advise anyone here to leave the hands off these young boys under-aged; because it might turn into them blackmailing you, threatening you for money later on. 

 

I don't intend to justify the deeds of the older guys, just pointing out. 

 

 

Edited June 7, 2025 by singalion

[QinWei]

On 6/5/2025 at 4:58 PM, thejuicetiger said:

did not use rubber? Seriously

Is The trend now, even in riskier sauna

 

alot requested for no condoms

my bottoms will attempt to pull them out too 

They assume I may not exit the room to get another 

 

1 (btm) might be on prep, he is safe but that doesnt mean he will not spread to me while he s having fun with many in various saunas and I am not on medication

[thejuicetiger]

6 minutes ago, QinWei said:

Is The trend now, even in riskier sauna

 

alot requested for no condoms

my bottoms will attempt to pull them out too 

They assume I may not exit the room to get another 

 

1 (btm) might be on prep, he is safe but that doesnt mean he will not spread to me while he s having fun with many in various saunas and I am not on medication

 

that's risky... even at the expense of stds, i feel it's not worth while in that moment of casual fun. =[ 

 

better to be safe than sorry. life has more to casual fun than it is

[singalion]

On 6/8/2025 at 7:28 AM, thejuicetiger said:

 

that's risky... even at the expense of stds, i feel it's not worth while in that moment of casual fun. =[ 

 

better to be safe than sorry. life has more to casual fun than it is

 

I just wonder why people always assume casual fun in a sauna is riskier than meeting someone at home or elsewhere?

 

Not talking about no condoms but STD in general. 

 

Even with a casual sex partner at your place, a hotel etc, you can still contract any STD. 

the only way would be not having any fun at all and to stay abstinent from any sexual contact. 

 

 

[thejuicetiger]

17 hours ago, singalion said:

 

I just wonder why people always assume casual fun in a sauna is riskier than meeting someone at home or elsewhere?

 

Not talking about no condoms but STD in general. 

 

Even with a casual sex partner at your place, a hotel etc, you can still contract any STD. 

the only way would be not having any fun at all and to stay abstinent from any sexual contact. 

 

 

 

definitely, it's not just in sauna, but any encounter outside of it 

[Why?]

On 3/16/2025 at 11:00 AM, sphere said:

Danisha who had said that he is a member of the LGBTQ community

 

So?  He is either innocent or not.  Why the need to drag the entire LGBTQ community with him?

[singalion]

3 hours ago, Why? said:

So?  He is either innocent or not.  Why the need to drag the entire LGBTQ community with him?

 

There could have been some exchange during the pre-operation phase where the alleged victim was uncomfortable because he recognised that the other is a a LGBT member. 

 

Point here again is evidence. 

Unless that nurse confessed that he touched the genitals, did it happen? 

 

If it happened the nurse was simply stupid and should have refrained from exploiting the situation. 

 

But as the victim mentioned the touching to the station nurse (the 2nd nurse) there is a probability that the molest happened. 

 

[Why?]

2 hours ago, singalion said:

 

There could have been some exchange during the pre-operation phase where the alleged victim was uncomfortable because he recognised that the other is a a LGBT member. 

 

 

In front of God or the judge, I live by my conscience and am true to who I am.  Unless you're bent by your own guilt, no one can make you confess anything you didn't do.  As in this instance, the nurse has no justification for bolstering his argument with the victim's propensity for homophobia.   The gay nurse has absolutely no excuse for his behaviour, even if the victim is a gay man.  

[singalion]

53 minutes ago, Why? said:

In front of God or the judge, I live by my conscience and am true to who I am.  Unless you're bent by your own guilt, no one can make you confess anything you didn't do.  As in this instance, the nurse has no justification for bolstering his argument with the victim's propensity for homophobia.   The gay nurse has absolutely no excuse for his behaviour, even if the victim is a gay man.  

 

Do we know what happened afterwards. 

Do we know whether the victim shouted homophobic profanities against the nurse?

 

As I said the molester actions (if they happened) were stupid and wrong. 

 

[singalion]

 

Nurse allegedly molested male relative of patient at hospital

Published Jun 30, 2025, 05:45 PM

 

 

 

SINGAPORE – A nurse was at a toilet at a hospital ward when he allegedly grabbed the private parts of a patient’s male relative with his hand.

 

The incident is said to have happened at around 7.30pm on June 18 at Raffles Hospital in North Bridge Road.

Elipe Siva Nagu, 34, now faces a molestation charge. Details about the alleged victim have been redacted from the court documents.

 

 

In a statement on June 30, a Raffles Hospital spokesperson told The Straits Times that Elipe has since been suspended from his nursing duties.

 

His case will be mentioned again in court on July 7.

 

If convicted of molestation, an offender can be jailed for up to three years, fined, caned or receive any combination of such punishments.

 

The spokesperson added: “At Raffles Hospital, we take such (allegations) with utmost seriousness and are committed to ensuring the safety and well-being of all the patients we serve and care for.

 

https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/courts-crime/nurse-allegedly-molested-male-relative-of-patient-at-hospital

 

 

 

[singalion]

 

2 teens posed as minors on dating sites to lure ‘paedophiles’ and extort money from them

 

 

SINGAPORE - Two teenage boys pretended to be minors on dating sites to lure “paedophiles” and extort money from them.

 

In one such incident, a 24-year-old man was duped into thinking that he was meeting a 15-year-old boy for sex.

 

When he arrived at the meeting place, one of the teenagers recorded him on a mobile phone, and the pair deleted the footage only after receiving $2,000 from the man.

 

 

Shaaqir Noor’rifqy Mohammed Noorrizat,19, the mastermind of the plan, pleaded guilty to one count of extortion on July 4. Two other similar charges will be taken into consideration when he is sentenced in August.

 

His accomplice cannot be named as he was just 17 at the time of the offences, and those <Banned Words> are protected under the Children and Young Persons Act. His case is pending.

 

Assistant Public Prosecutor Chye Jer Yuan said: “(Shaaqir) had come up with the idea to impersonate underage females or males on online dating applications to lure paedophiles and extort money from them.”

 

 

The teenagers posed as underage individuals who were seeking sexual encounters and went on platforms such as Grindr, commonly used by gay men, and hook-up groups on Telegram.

 

The 24-year-old man was duped on Grindr. When he went to the void deck of a Bukit Batok block of flats at around noon on Nov 6, 2024, Shaaqir and his accomplice confronted him.

They started to question the man on why he wanted to meet a minor for sex and threatened to alert the police.

 

APP Chye said: “They told him that they would keep this a secret if he paid them, before stopping the recording. The (man) agreed and both accused followed him to withdraw a sum of $2,000.”

Shaaqir and his accomplice then deleted the recording in front of the man after receiving the money.

Both teenagers were arrested at around 11pm that day. The prosecutor did not disclose in court documents how the pair’s offences were discovered.

 

On July 4, the court called for reports to assess Shaaqir’s suitability for both probation and reformative training.

Young offenders ordered to undergo reformative training are detained in a centre to undergo a strict regimen that can include foot drills and counselling.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[singalion]

Another gay male nurse related offence...

 

What's with these guys?

 

Former NUH male nurse charged after he allegedly molested man at hospital

Published Jul 18, 2025,

 

 

SINGAPORE – A former National University Hospital (NUH) male nurse faces two charges after he allegedly molested a 25-year-old man at the medical facility on April 18, 2024.

 

Muhammad Shahrun Nizam Ahmad Ruslie is also accused of offering to perform a sexual act on him that day.

On July 15, the 29-year-old Singaporean was charged with one count each of molestation and using words or gestures to insult another person’s modesty.

 

Court documents did not disclose if the alleged victim was a patient, a staff member or a visitor at the hospital.

 

An NUH spokesperson told The Straits Times on July 18: “(Shahrun) is no longer in service with us. We are fully cooperating with the authorities. As the matter is before the courts, we are unable to comment further.”

 

Shahrun’s name was still on an online register of healthcare professionals in Singapore on July 18.

 

His case will be mentioned again in court on Aug 12.

 

 

If convicted of molestation, he can be jailed for up to three years, fined, caned or receive any combination of such punishments.

 

Offenders convicted of using words or gestures to insult another person’s modesty can be jailed for up to a year, fined or both.

 

 

 

[Vometra]

Business owner now a food delivery rider after lending over $200,000 to man he met at poker game

https://www.stomp.sg/singapore-seen/business-owner-now-delivery-rider-after-transferring-over-200000-wrong-person-he

 

Edited July 26, 2025 by Vometra

[KINKYMALAY]

23 hours ago, Vometra said:

Business owner now a food delivery rider after lending over $200,000 to man he met at poker game

 

https://www.stomp.sg/singapore-seen/business-owner-now-delivery-rider-after-transferring-over-200000-wrong-person-he

 

Link is dead.

[Vometra]

1 hour ago, KINKYMALAY said:

Link is dead.

 

Alive again!

[QinWei]

Erm his look:

https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/ica-visit-pass-team-leader-sexual-favours-men-5262831?cid=FBcna&fbclid=IwQ0xDSwL0aChleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHoKFMoYpIwZM6U3md90CeFeGaV5W7V-kxlmt55d4CWri8Ice9XhFZDmPFH-N_aem_MgwBOgZ9WxjvZroz1pfy4A
 

Team lead of ICA's Visit Pass Unit sought sexual acts from men to help them with applications

Kannan Morice Rajagopal Jayaram obtained sex acts from six men between 2022 and 2023 in exchange for helping them with their short-term visit pass applications.
…….

 

When the foreigner realised his application had been approved, he thanked Kannan and continued drinking beer with him.

After this, Kannan asked for a kiss. The foreigner declined as he was not sexually attracted to Kannan.

Kannan persisted, and the foreigner eventually acceded as he was "grateful to the accused for his help in granting" the application, said Deputy Public Prosecutors Bryan Wong and Benjamin Low.

He was also afraid that Kannan would cancel the pass if he was rejected.

They went to Kannan's bedroom, where Kannan performed sex acts on the foreigner.

The foreigner later admitted that he would not have allowed Kannan to carry out those acts if he had not been an ICA officer with the capability to extend the pass.

[thickhead79]

S'porean man, 32, asks boy, 14, to be 'friends with benefits', visits him with sex toys, gets caught red-handed

He was sentenced to 12 months in jail.

 

Even though a Singaporean man, then 31, knew that a boy he was chatting with on Telegram in December 2024 was 14 years old, he continued to ask him to be friends with benefits.

After the boy realised that the man, Yong Ming Quan, was asking him for sex, he informed his father, who then suggested that the boy invite Yong to their house in order to catch him red-handed.

 

Came up with plan to catch Yong red-handed

Later on, the victim realised through their conversations that Yong was asking him for sex.

In response, the victim informed his father about the situation, and his father suggested that the victim call Yong down to their house on Dec. 18, 2024 so that he could be caught red-handed.

Following his father's advice, the victim told Yong that he was "horny", to which Yong replied that he was on his way to the victim's house.

 

On Jul. 28, Yong was sentenced to 12 months' imprisonment after pleading guilty to the former charge, while the latter charge was taken into consideration for his sentencing, reported 8world News.

During court proceedings, it was also revealed that Yong was sentenced to 10 days' imprisonment in 2021 for secretly filming a male victim showering and possessing obscene materials involving young boys.

Edited July 28, 2025 by thickhead79

[mate69]

so many of such sex news lately

[QinWei]

Liar him: blatantly lied??!

 

'I would never have suspected there were drugs': Doctor on trial for consuming MDMA at party says drink was spiked

Dr Rayson Lee Rui Sheng completed his testimony on the stand on Monday (Jul 28), with his co-accused Tan Li Ming expected to testify on Tuesday. 

 

Look at their attire and it seemed like all are males?

https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/sentosa-drug-raid-doctor-man-trial-consuming-mdma-5262836?cid=FBcna&fbclid=IwQ0xDSwL1C_ZleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHiNCEAEfEj0Ubqj69iBjhCi5ovSZxmmpDvrQc1QNTMr6gfk4gSU1Hpm_zcml_aem_qNfBdkEO0Nu1PIn97eWzGQ

 

 

https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/drug-raid-sentosa-hotel-villa-party-mdma-trial-5238791?fbclid=IwQ0xDSwL1DAdleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHiNCEAEfEj0Ubqj69iBjhCi5ovSZxmmpDvrQc1QNTMr6gfk4gSU1Hpm_zcml_aem_qNfBdkEO0Nu1PIn97eWzGQ

 

 

Three segments of his hair, each corresponding to different periods of time he allegedly consumed drugs, were analysed and found to contain MDMA and Ketamine. 

The time periods ranged from between January and late March 2023, between late March and late May 2023, and late May to late July 2023. 

 

Dr Lee was also asked at length about previous instances where he could have consumed drugs, in particular during a trip to Pattaya, Thailand, in June 2023.