Jump to content
Male HQ

Singapore Local Gay News [LGBT Related News] (Compiled)


GuestWriter

Recommended Posts

On 8/31/2022 at 7:10 PM, mate69 said:

 

Yes...so many videos of this online...easy to find

terrible

Amazing none of those victims notice they have been filmed in the shower.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read the article and I feel compassion for the guy. As many of you pointed out, he probably led a very repressed life, never fully free to express his gay self. As reported, he filmed all these men in locker rooms and wherever else, and all he can do is to look/admire them from a distance and never actually engaged with them. It is just not a living, but existing. I do not know him, or if he has some support system, a group of gay friends, etc. TBH, there are saunas in Sg and there's OnlyFans

 

Coming out is not so much for the rest of the world. It is for yourself. You have to live your life according to your terms, and not what is dictated to you by your parents, school, society etc.  If coming out, is going to deny you certain opportunities, then that place is not for you.

Love. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest ffffffff
On 9/1/2022 at 12:07 AM, doncoin said:

I read the article and I feel compassion for the guy. As many of you pointed out, he probably led a very repressed life, never fully free to express his gay self. As reported, he filmed all these men in locker rooms and wherever else, and all he can do is to look/admire them from a distance and never actually engaged with them. It is just not a living, but existing. I do not know him, or if he has some support system, a group of gay friends, etc. TBH, there are saunas in Sg and there's OnlyFans

 

Coming out is not so much for the rest of the world. It is for yourself. You have to live your life according to your terms, and not what is dictated to you by your parents, school, society etc.  If coming out, is going to deny you certain opportunities, then that place is not for you.

If someone works in schools, police force, scdf, .

Don't think it's advisable to come out and risk ridicule in the workplace.

Those creative industries are filled with people who are openly gay. Even newsrooms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Shadows
On 9/1/2022 at 8:22 AM, Guest ffffffff said:

If someone works in schools, police force, scdf, .

Don't think it's advisable to come out and risk ridicule in the workplace.

Those creative industries are filled with people who are openly gay. Even newsrooms.


but if everybody gay in more conservative environments stays in the closet, then it will be that way forever. Hopefully there are some braver souls out there who take the ‘risk’ of coming out to create the space to others it is possible.

 

I agree that you should come out for yourself, when you are ready, but don’t ignore that your coming out can be helpful for those who come next. Being gay is nothing to be ashamed of, by hiding a fundamental part of yourself, you are accepting to be stigmatized from the very beginning. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Least harm is not enough
On 9/1/2022 at 12:07 AM, doncoin said:

I read the article and I feel compassion for the guy. As many of you pointed out, he probably led a very repressed life, never fully free to express his gay self. As reported, he filmed all these men in locker rooms and wherever else, and all he can do is to look/admire them from a distance and never actually engaged with them. It is just not a living, but existing. I do not know him, or if he has some support system, a group of gay friends, etc. TBH, there are saunas in Sg and there's OnlyFans

 

Coming out is not so much for the rest of the world. It is for yourself. You have to live your life according to your terms, and not what is dictated to you by your parents, school, society etc.  If coming out, is going to deny you certain opportunities, then that place is not for you.

He thought his petty fetish is the least of harm as it won't even harm a hair.

 

The prosecutor blew it out of proportion by suggesting he would spread it on the internet.

 

I would rather he go to any sauna and have all the dirty notti debauchery sex he wants and stop trying to be a goody goody 2shoes and hope that faith would reward him for restraining himself. 

Not just see. Can touch can play with the naked men he wants.

 

YOLO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest ffffffff
On 9/1/2022 at 9:58 AM, Guest Shadows said:


but if everybody gay in more conservative environments stays in the closet, then it will be that way forever. Hopefully there are some braver souls out there who take the ‘risk’ of coming out to create the space to others it is possible.

 

I agree that you should come out for yourself, when you are ready, but don’t ignore that your coming out can be helpful for those who come next. Being gay is nothing to be ashamed of, by hiding a fundamental part of yourself, you are accepting to be stigmatized from the very beginning. 

Just to share, it's not so good to work in a school close to your home. As I found to my detriment. My colleagues from other schools cautioned me. 

 

Later, I resigned due to the toxic environment, a snakepit disguised as a loving christian environment.

 

after that the hawkers, doctors, shops in the estate who were previously very nice to me , acted like they did not want my business.  As if my resignation became their personal agenda .

 

and this wasn't a coming out. So you see how irrational and evil people can be. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/1/2022 at 12:07 AM, doncoin said:

I read the article and I feel compassion for the guy. As many of you pointed out, he probably led a very repressed life, never fully free to express his gay self. As reported, he filmed all these men in locker rooms and wherever else, and all he can do is to look/admire them from a distance and never actually engaged with them. It is just not a living, but existing. I do not know him, or if he has some support system, a group of gay friends, etc. TBH, there are saunas in Sg and there's OnlyFans

 

Coming out is not so much for the rest of the world. It is for yourself. You have to live your life according to your terms, and not what is dictated to you by your parents, school, society etc.  If coming out, is going to deny you certain opportunities, then that place is not for you.

 

Doncoin! 

If he is so repressed... damn with millions of gay twitter explicit guys... also he can go sauna and watch plenty of naked guys with all shapes n dick sizes. 

 

What has coming out to do with secretly filming other men in Safra or other places... 

 

Also, it is disturbing of such guys as he infringed into straight guys zone. 

 

Leave the straight guys alone, this is not your territory. 

 

That is how is case actually rolled out of hand. 

 

Instead he should have controlled his kinky addiction to film straight guys. 

 

It is not as if there arent sufficient gay guys around... 

 

His issues might have been different or having different background. 

 

Edited by singalion
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/2/2022 at 1:07 PM, singalion said:

 

Doncoin! 

If he is so repressed... damn with millions of gay twitter explicit guys... also he can go sauna and watch plenty of naked guys with all shapes n dick sizes. 

 

What has coming out to do with secretly filming other men in Safra or other places... 

 

Also, it is disturbing of such guys as he infringed into straight guys zone. 

 

Leave the straight guys alone, this is not your territory. 

 

That is how is case actually rolled out of hand. 

 

Instead he should have controlled his kinky addiction to film straight guys. 

 

It is not as if there arent sufficient gay guys around... 

 

His issues might have been different or having different background. 

 

 

I agree 100%. But I have also met guys who are so repressed and ashamed of themselves that they really don't have a healthy way to express their own sexuality. Granted the way he went about doing it is wrong and illegal on so many levels. I am not condoning his actions. I just think that the outcome would have been so much more different if he had an outlet where he can safely express himself. He made the bed, shat on it, now he has to go lie on it. 

 

I admit that not many people have the privilege or luxury to be themselves for whatever reasons, and have to live their lives according to what others dictated to them. Yes, there are gay establishments like saunas, bars, etc. where he can be himself. In the very worst case, he can always pay for sex. But he opted not to do so, and I supposed there is the thrill of being caught that adds to the gratification of filming illegally. It is dumb but it is his choice. 

Love. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every time a gay man is exposed in a sexual act, the media makes his face public. Straight folks who caught in the act, you hear "gag order," which means that the person being caught is not to be named.  As far as I can tell, the entire system has always treated us with the worst hatred and scorn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Former HDB director jailed 2 weeks, fined S$31,600 for taking obscene images of men

Leo Norman Chee Wei Kiong’s offences came to light when he used his phone to secretly film a man he found attractive at an NTUC FairPrice supermarket outlet at Kallang Bahru in October 2020.

The man confronted Chee, who agreed to delete the footage. As the man was checking that the video was deleted, he noticed that Chee’s phone had obscene videos of other naked men.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jail for voyeur who filmed men showering but aborted plans to upload videos for cash as they weren't 'professional' enough

Guan Lock Chang at the State Courts on Sept 8, 2022.Nuria Ling/TODAY

 

 

SINGAPORE — A 27-year-old man was sentenced to jail time on Thursday (Sept 😎 for taking multiple video clips of men showering at Toa Payoh Swimming Complex over several months.

Guan Lock Chang wanted to post the voyeuristic videos online to make some money, but did not proceed with his plan in the end because he felt that they were not professional enough.

 

Singapore

Jail for voyeur who filmed men showering but aborted plans to upload videos for cash as they weren't 'professional' enough
 

ADVERTISEMENT

 
 

Jail for voyeur who filmed men showering but aborted plans to upload videos for cash as they weren't 'professional' enough

Guan Lock Chang at the State Courts on Sept 8, 2022.Nuria Ling/TODAY

Guan Lock Chang at the State Courts on Sept 8, 2022.

Follow us on Instagram and Tiktok, and join our Telegram channel for the latest updates.
 
Published September 8, 2022
Updated September 8, 2022
 

SINGAPORE — A 27-year-old man was sentenced to jail time on Thursday (Sept 😎 for taking multiple video clips of men showering at Toa Payoh Swimming Complex over several months.

Guan Lock Chang wanted to post the voyeuristic videos online to make some money, but did not proceed with his plan in the end because he felt that they were not professional enough.

ADVERTISEMENT

Guan, a Malaysian, was jailed for 18 weeks — or about four months. He pleaded guilty to one count of voyeurism with another charge taken into consideration for sentencing.

He will begin serving his sentence on Oct 3 and remains out on bail of S$15,000.

The court heard that in late October last year, he came up with the idea of taking and posting such videos online to earn some cash.

He then went to the men’s toilet at Toa Payoh Swimming Complex, entered a cubicle next to a person who was showering, and filmed each one by raising his mobile phone over the cubicle wall.

He ended up taking 20 video clips over six different days between October last year and January this year.

 

The videos ranged from five to 26 seconds long, involving at least seven unidentified men whose genitals and buttocks were captured in the footage.

Guan was nabbed only on Jan 17 this year when a man caught him red-handed. The victim called the police, saying that the man was trying to delete the evidence in front of him.

The prosecution sought 18 to 20 weeks' jail, noting that Guan was driven by profit and committed the offences on multiple occasions.

For voyeurism, he could have been jailed for up to two years, fined, caned, or given any combination of the three.

 

https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/voyeur-jail-film-men-showering-money-1987741

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Since u r a retard
On 9/11/2022 at 5:57 PM, Since u r here said:

erm!
those who experience tons of showering w other guys Also yearned much to see guys in nude , and love the sight of dicks!

 

though a person who  has never been thru compulsory conscription, may have been playing balls and showering w tons of guys (or frequently workout in a gym)! work in an env where need to bathe before knocking off from work .....seen countless till it is NUMBED

 


whatever

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jail for porn-watching youth who sexually abused 7-year-old cousin staying with him in grandparents’ flat

The man was sentenced to eight years and six months’ jail, along with six strokes of the cane, after he pleaded guilty to sexual penetration of a minor and using criminal force to outrage his cousin’s modesty.

⚖️

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He then began sexually assaulting the girl on multiple occasions over a period of six months between 2012 and 2013 when he was alone with her.

Usually, he would take the girl to a common staircase landing at the block of flats where their grandparents lived and got her to perform various sex acts on him.

Thereafter, he would take her to a convenience store nearby to buy a snack, and made her promise not to tell anyone what had happened.

DPP Teo said that the girl complied each time because she not only did not know how to react, but was scared as well.

The cousin eventually got bolder and started taking advantage of the girl in the bedroom to engage in sex acts with her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/trial-ord-sexual-assault-drinking-1998676

 

This is quite fucked-up leh seriously what the hell is wrong with some people. 

 

Man on trial for sexually assaulting male friend, 20, after night of drinking

They then celebrated the completion of his full-time National Service the following month
After getting drunk, they went to Pe’s condominium unit where he allegedly sexually violated the younger man


The prosecution said they will lead evidence to prove that the alleged victim could not consent due to intoxication

 

BY LOUISA TANG 
Published September 21, 2022
Updated September 21, 2022


SINGAPORE — A night of pub crawling in 2017 turned into a nightmare for a 20-year-old man, after his male friend allegedly took advantage of his intoxicated state to sexually assault him several times while he drifted in and out of consciousness.

 

He had hung out with the alleged assailant, Jeffrey Pe, that evening to celebrate the completion of his full-time National Service.

 

On Wednesday (Sept 21), Pe, now aged 45, began standing trial in the High Court.

 

The Singaporean is contesting three charges of sexual assault by penetration. He claims that his alleged victim consented to the acts.

 

The younger man, who is now 25 and is a Singapore permanent resident from the United Kingdom, cannot be named due to a court order to protect his identity.

 

He testified behind closed doors on Wednesday, with reporters and the public not allowed to attend the hearing.

 

'EXPLOITED NAIVETE': PROSECUTION
In their opening statement, Deputy Public Prosecutors (DPPs) David Khoo and Tay Jia En told the court that Pe exploited the younger man’s “naivete and trusting nature to commit a slate of serious sexual offences against the victim when he was at his most vulnerable”.


The pair got to know each other at Hero’s pub along Circular Road in July 2017. They exchanged phone numbers and later met on July 30 at a bar to celebrate Pe’s birthday.

 

The DPPs said Pe had learned that the alleged victim recently broke up with his longtime girlfriend and was looking to meet people, in particular girls.

 

“The accused thereafter gained the victim’s trust by showing that he was a sociable and extroverted person who could introduce the victim to people to expand the victim’s social network,” the prosecutors added.

 

They next met in the wee hours of Aug 6 that year, when the younger man asked Pe over social media application Snapchat if he wanted to drink.

However, Pe fell asleep. The other man continued drinking with his friends at Clarke Quay.


The pair subsequently met on Aug 8 that year to celebrate the younger man completing his full-time NS.

 

They had several alcoholic drinks at a restaurant and some pubs in the Chinatown area, before taking a taxi to Pe’s condominium. The alleged victim had felt drunk and asked Pe if he could “crash” at Pe’s place.

 

There, Pe made him an alcoholic beverage and offered him a change of clothes, as well as to sleep on his bed.

 

He declined before falling asleep on the floor of Pe’s bedroom.

 

VICTIM DEVELOPED ANXIETY DISORDER
Sometime later, the young man woke up to find Pe allegedly performing oral sex on him. Pe also purportedly used his own fingers to penetrate him anally twice.

 

The alleged victim, who was semi-unconscious, then pushed Pe away and went to the toilet to wash up. He left the unit and called his friend, saying Pe had raped him, before calling the police.

 

Pe was arrested a few hours later.

 

The prosecution said they will lead evidence from 26 witnesses to prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt.

 

This includes two Singapore General Hospital doctors who examined the alleged victim, as well as an Institute of Mental Health (IMH) psychiatrist who will testify that he was likely to still be drunk during the sexual acts and therefore unable to consent.

 

Another IMH psychiatrist is also set to testify that Pe does not suffer from any mental illness.

 

A National University Hospital psychiatrist had diagnosed the alleged victim with an anxiety disorder with possible post-traumatic stress symptoms, having examined him around August 2018.

 

DPPs Tay and Khoo added in their opening statement: “Every Singaporean son will fondly remember his Operationally Ready Date, where he is formally released from full-time NS duties.

 

"Alas, not so for the (alleged) victim. Instead of fond memories, he is instead left with indelible scars of National Day 2017, and he had to seek professional help to overcome the trauma he received from the incident.”

 

The trial is set to continue for the rest of the week.

 

Pe is defended by lawyers Amarjit Singh and Simrin Sidhu.

 

If convicted of sexual assault by penetration, he could be jailed for up to 20 years, as well as fined or caned, for each charge.


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/22/2022 at 3:55 PM, Guest Lou said:

I really don't know how I will react if I'm also in the same situation.  Presume that the drunk guy is young fit and good looking being knock out by alcohol and sleeping in my room ..

While you might find it tempting, please do not ever take advantage of someone who cannot consent because that is absolute trash behaviour. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Warning to all those here who think they can film other guys!

 

 

To note: First time that judge gave exactly the sentence that the Prosecutor sought!

 

Jail terms also seem to getting higher now.

 

20 weeks jail worth for some shady, unclear videos of other nude men in public places (for vids you can find everywhere on the internet) ???

 

I found his explanation (ugly) the silliest, he could have just spent little money and go to a sauna and watch nude men showering the whole night long and to compare bodies there are so many pics in the internet.

 

 

Man gets 20 weeks' jail for filming other men showering in Anytime Fitness gym

 

December 16, 2022

 

 

SINGAPORE — A 36-year-old man was sentenced to 20 weeks' jail on Friday (Dec 16) for filming other men showering at the gym, claiming that he did so because he thought his body "looked terrible" and wanted to look more like others.

 

Von Ling Wei Hao, a Singaporean who was working as a compliance officer with an investment management firm, pleaded guilty to eight charges related to voyeurism. Five similar charges were taken into consideration during sentencing.

 

The court heard that Ling filmed men showering on at least 11 occasions between May 2018 and January 2020. 

All of the recordings were taken at the changing room of the Anytime Fitness gym at International Plaza on Anson Road in the Central Business District.

 

Ling’s crimes came to light on Jan 8, 2020 while he was at the gym exercising, the court heard.

 

After a 30-minute workout, Ling went to the male changing room to shower when he noticed that one of the cubicles was occupied.

 

He went to the adjoining cubicle, took out his mobile phone and started filming the man from above the partition.

The victim spotted the phone about two minutes later. He got out and knocked on Ling’s cubicle door but Ling did not respond.

 

The victim then went to report the matter to a staff member at the gym and they returned to the changing room together and knocked on Ling’s cubicle door again.

 

This time, he replied that he was changing.

 

Deputy Public Prosecutor Yohanes Ng said: “He was panicking and stalling for time.”

 

After getting changed, Ling exited the cubicle and denied that he was filming the victim. 

However, he eventually handed his phone to a staff member, who called the police. 

 

Ling was arrested and later admitted that it was not his first time recording men in the shower. 

 

“He claimed that he did so out of a sense of inferiority because he thought he looked ugly and was therefore curious about what other men’s bodies looked like,” DPP Ng said.

 

“He also explained that he did so because he thought his body looked terrible, and he wanted to look like others.”

Noting that incidents of voyeurism continue to rise, DPP Ng sought 20 weeks’ jail, saying that such a sentence was “by no means crushing” and was needed to deter would-be voyeurs.

 

 

Ling’s lawyer Kalaithasan Karuppaya from Regent Law pleaded for leniency. He said that his client wishes to put the episode behind him and is extremely worried for his career.

 

Addressing the court directly, Ling said: “I’m very sorry and remorseful for what I have done to the victims and everyone involved. I promise to be a good standing citizen in the future. Please give me a chance to contribute to society.” 

An offence of voyeurism carries a penalty of up to two years’ jail or fine or caning, or any combination of these punishments.

 

 

https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/man-gets-20-weeks-jail-filming-other-men-showering-anytime-fitness-gym-2073496

 

 

Edited by singalion
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
32 minutes ago, Since u r here said:

they obviously wont have an excuse, Singalion
and to me , what matter MOST are those using fitness club/gyms wont raise their level of awareness/alertness?

 

 

 


this is more daring

任职期间涉非礼男子 退休警员被控上庭 https://www.zaobao.com.sg/realtime/singapore/story20230120-1355395?fbclid=IwAR0RADZC1GFzs6SspUUsw1o3hzxliUZ7Ld9HuWZbFRp63IhPM6gAMeoLSP8

 

Usin a police station to commit? 
被告于2003年在宏茂桥警署总部的办公室非礼一名男子。同年,他又在同个警署的会议室,亲吻一名男子头部,以及触碰他的私处。

 

被告拉玛·尚科·辛格(Rama Shanker Singh,59岁)星期五(1月20日)被控五项非礼、一项抵触影片法令,以及两项拥有猥亵材料的罪名。

新加坡警察部队回复《联合早报》询问时,证实被告是一名退休警员,于2016年6月13日离开警队。警方没提及被告的职衔。

took so long for them to report?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Try and see
23 hours ago, Since u r here said:

this is more daring

任职期间涉非礼男子 退休警员被控上庭 https://www.zaobao.com.sg/realtime/singapore/story20230120-1355395?fbclid=IwAR0RADZC1GFzs6SspUUsw1o3hzxliUZ7Ld9HuWZbFRp63IhPM6gAMeoLSP8

 

Usin a police station to commit? 
被告于2003年在宏茂桥警署总部的办公室非礼一名男子。同年,他又在同个警署的会议室,亲吻一名男子头部,以及触碰他的私处。

 

被告拉玛·尚科·辛格(Rama Shanker Singh,59岁)星期五(1月20日)被控五项非礼、一项抵触影片法令,以及两项拥有猥亵材料的罪名。

新加坡警察部队回复《联合早报》询问时,证实被告是一名退休警员,于2016年6月13日离开警队。警方没提及被告的职衔。

 

The men that he molested most likely are also police officers; probably his subordinates.

Maybe that's why they all kept quite about their abuse until he retired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For completeness the English version:

 

Two Singapore police officers charged in court for molesting man & woman in unrelated cases

27 Jan 2023

 

SINGAPORE — A retired police officer was accused of molesting a man several times during his four years in office, and another police officer was accused of molesting a woman. The two police officers were charged with knowingly breaking the law. The cases involved in the two are not related.

 

Rama Shanker Singh, 59, a former inspector of the Singapore Police Force, was charged on Friday, Jan 20, with five counts of indecent assault, one count of violating the Films Act, and two counts of possessing obscene material.

 

The Singapore Police Force confirmed in a reply media that Singh had left the police force on June 13, 2016

 

The charge alleges that Singh molested a man at the Ang Mo Kio police office in 2003. In the same year, he again molested a man in a conference room at the same police station.

 

In 2005, he allegedly molested a man at the office of a department at the Ministry of Home Affairs Building on Irrawaddy Road. In the following year, he was also accused twice of molesting men in police cars.

 

A police spokesperson revealed that one of the victims called the police on Dec 13, 2020, and the police immediately launched an investigation and provided assistance to the victim.

 

 

https://theindependent.sg/two-singapore-police-officers-charged-in-court-for-molesting-man-woman-in-unrelated-cases/

 

 

Interesting to note that this was tolerated by the SPF for that long period. Also strange for police officers not to come forward on their colleague... Molesting someone in the police car, surely should be a police officer... First cases from 2003 and 2005, reports were made and it dragged on to 2020?

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/22/2023 at 3:32 PM, Guest Try and see said:

 

The men that he molested most likely are also police officers; probably his subordinates.

Maybe that's why they all kept quite about their abuse until he retired.

 

But it said, in 2005 with the police car incident, he was accused of having molested them. So the police officers must have made a report.

 

Maybe such behaviour normal in SPF    😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Try and see
On 1/27/2023 at 2:26 PM, singalion said:

But it said, in 2005 with the police car incident, he was accused of having molested them. So the police officers must have made a report.

 

Maybe such behaviour normal in SPF    😂

 

I think for the 2003 or 2005 cases, the victims kept quiet until the guy had retired, for fear of him taking revenge against them if he was still in the force.

So when one victim made an accusation in 2020, they went through the list and interviewed everyone who was ever his subordinate in the SPF to see if there were more victims. That's when all the other policemen victims revealed their encounters.

 

It's hard to say as the entire matter is shrouded in secrecy, as is usually the case for misconduct within the uniformed government departments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Try and see
On 1/27/2023 at 2:25 PM, singalion said:

Also strange for police officers not to come forward on their colleague... Molesting someone in the police car, surely should be a police officer... First cases from 2003 and 2005, reports were made and it dragged on to 2020?

 

It's not strange. If the guy was their reporting officer, and also in-charge of their appraisal and promotion, most likely the junior policeman will just keep quiet about it.

After all, if there was no evidence, it's very much "my word against his word", and more likely, people may not believe the words of a rookie policeman who accuses a veteran and experienced policeman of molest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Papa Rama is a retired police officer who was in regular service ya? he has

a lot of money definitely (i know a police officer who's also in regular service whose salary is like WOW) ..and when he retires, one big lump sum goes to him too...victim lodged complaint on 13 Dec 2020...thats ard when covid begins, companies were starting to retrench employees n money issues for almost everyone...perhaps Papa Rama has been a very generous 'sugar dad' to his 'sugar boys' aka the junior police officers whom he 'molested' but alas covid was the game changer n these 'victims’ thought why not bring up the matter to authorities n get a handsome monetary compensation in one lump sum too from Papa Rama? juz another thought...dun get

mad ya 😘

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Man found guilty of sexually assaulting younger man who had fallen asleep on his room floor

A High Court judge found the victim "unusually convincing" and the accused man "a disingenuous witness". 

Man found guilty of sexually assaulting younger man who had fallen asleep on his room floor

File photo of the Supreme Court of Singapore (Photo: CNA/Jeremy Long)

Koh Wan Ting  18 Apr 2023 07:47PM(Updated: 18 Apr 2023 08:07PM)

 

SINGAPORE: A man accused of sexually assaulting a younger man who lay inebriated on the floor of his bedroom was convicted of his charges on Tuesday (Apr 18) after a High Court judge found him to be a "disingenuous witness". 

 

Singaporean Jeffrey Pe, 45, had in September last year claimed trial to three charges of sexually penetrating the victim, then aged 20, on Aug 9, 2017. The victim cannot be named due to a gag order protecting his identity. 

 

As part of his defence, Pe had argued that before the sexual encounters, the victim had indicated he was exploring his sexuality and had shown romantic interest in him. Pe claimed that the acts in two of the charges were consensual while denying the act in the last charge. 

VICTIM'S ACCOUNT UNUSUALLY CONVINCING

Delivering the verdict, Justice Mavis Chionh observed that in cases where the only witness is the victim, the victim's evidence must be found to be "unusually convincing" or must be corroborated. 

 

Having reviewed the evidence and submissions, the judge found that the victim in the present case was an "honest witness" whose evidence was unusually convincing. 

 

"Not only was the complainant’s evidence unusually convincing, I am also satisfied that there was other evidence in this case which corroborated his account of the alleged offences.

 

"Not only did the complainant consistently deny the accused’s claims of a consensual sexual encounter, but he also consistently told numerous third parties – his friend, the police, and doctors at the Singapore General Hospital (SGH) – that he had been sexually assaulted; and he made these complaints at the first reasonable opportunity – indeed, within a very short time of the alleged offences," said Justice Chionh. 

 

Referring to audio recordings of calls the victim had made to the police after the incident, the judge said: "I could hear for myself the state of emotional distress the complainant was in." 

 

During his examination by doctors, the victim had also provided an account that was consistent with his testimony during trial, the judge noted. 

 

According to the prosecution, Pe met up with the victim on Aug 8, 2017. The two consumed alcoholic drinks before heading to Pe's residence.

 

At the apartment, Pe made the victim an alcoholic drink. The victim fell asleep on the floor of Pe's bedroom and awoke sometime later to find Pe sexually assaulting him. 

ACCUSED IS DISINGENUOUS

In contrast, the judge rejected Pe's argument that there were material inconsistencies in the victim's account before and during the trial, as these focused chiefly on differences in terminology and were immaterial to the victim's credibility. 

 

"I find (the accused) to be a disingenuous witness whose claims about the complainant's alleged romantic interest in him and the complainant’s alleged expressions of interest in exploring his sexuality were not at all borne out by the objective evidence before me," she added. 

 

The accused attempted to suggest that the victim was flirtatious or seductive in his text messages, but there was nothing to show that the victim had been romantically interested in or sexually attracted to Pe, the judge said. 

She also dismissed the accused's suggestions that he was intimidated by police officers or that there were inaccuracies in his statement. 

 

In fact, the accused had penned and signed beside the amendments on his statement, she noted. 

 

"Having perused the accused’s Aug 10, 2017 statement, it was clear to me that there were telling differences between his narrative in the statement and his testimony in court, which strongly suggested to me that he was embellishing his testimony in court in an attempt to make his account of an allegedly consensual sexual interlude more convincing," Justice Chionh said. 

 

 

"I find (the accused) to be a disingenuous witness whose claims about the complainant's alleged romantic interest in him and the complainant’s alleged expressions of interest in exploring his sexuality were not at all borne out by the objective evidence before me," she added. 

 

The accused attempted to suggest that the victim was flirtatious or seductive in his text messages, but there was nothing to show that the victim had been romantically interested in or sexually attracted to Pe, the judge said. 

 

She also dismissed the accused's suggestions that he was intimidated by police officers or that there were inaccuracies in his statement. 

 

In fact, the accused had penned and signed beside the amendments on his statement, she noted. 

 

"Having perused the accused’s Aug 10, 2017 statement, it was clear to me that there were telling differences between his narrative in the statement and his testimony in court, which strongly suggested to me that he was embellishing his testimony in court in an attempt to make his account of an allegedly consensual sexual interlude more convincing," Justice Chionh said. 

 

 

Edited by GachiMuchi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man on trial for sexually assaulting younger man who lay on his floor drunk

Jeffrey Pe took advantage of the fact that the younger man had just broken up with his girlfriend, and was looking to meet other women, said the prosecution. 

Man on trial for sexually assaulting younger man who lay on his floor drunk

A man holding an alcoholic beverage. (Photo: iStock)

21 Sep 2022 02:10PM(Updated: 21 Sep 2022 02:10PM)
 

SINGAPORE: The trial for a man accused of sexually assaulting a man half his age and fresh out of national service opened on Wednesday (Sep 21), with the prosecution charging that the older man had exploited the alleged victim's  trusting nature. 

 

Jeffrey Pe, a 45-year-old Singaporean, faces three charges of sexually penetrating the victim, then aged 20, as he lay inebriated on the floor of Pe's flat on Aug 9, 2017. 

 

The victim cannot be named due to a gag order protecting his identity. 

 

Opening its case on Wednesday, Deputy Public Prosecutors David Khoo and Tay Jia En said that Pe had sexually assaulted the victim when he was at his most vulnerable. 

 

"The accused had learnt that the victim had recently broken up with his girlfriend and was therefore looking to meet new people (girls in particular). 

 

"The accused thereafter gained the victim’s trust by showing that he was a sociable and extroverted person who could introduce the victim to people to expand the victim’s social network," said the prosecution. 

 

However, at a night out to celebrate the victim's completion of his full-time national service, Pe allegedly sexually assaulted the victim. 

 

"Every Singaporean son will fondly remember his Operationally Ready Date, where he is formally released from full-time National Service duties.

 

"Alas, not so for the then 20-year-old victim. Instead of fond memories, the victim is instead left with indelible scars of National Day 2017, and he had to seek professional help to overcome the trauma he received from the incident," said the prosecution. 

 

According to the prosecution, Pe and the victim first met at a pub around Jul 23, 2017. 

 

At the time, the victim had just broken up with his girlfriend and wanted to know more women. He befriended Pe who appeared connected with a woman he was interested in.

 

The two exchanged numbers after Pe invited both the victim and the woman to his birthday party on Jul 29, 2017. They conversed over WhatsApp in the meantime. 

 

Pe met the victim at a bar on Jul 30 to celebrate the former's birthday.  

 

On Aug 6, 2017, the victim allegedly wanted to meet Pe to drink, but the older man fell asleep before they could meet. Pe apologised and both agreed to meet two days later for drinks. 

 

On Aug 8, the victim met Pe at night and they consumed alcoholic drinks in the Chinatown area before the victim allegedly asked to sleep at Pe's residence. 

 

The prosecution said it would lead evidence to show that on Aug 9, Pe made the victim an alcoholic drink and offered the younger man a change of clothes and his bed to sleep in. The victim allegedly declined the clothes and the bed, falling asleep on the floor of Pe's bedroom in his own clothing. 

 

He awoke sometime later to find that his jeans and underwear had been pulled down, and Pe was sexually assaulting him, the prosecution alleged. 

 

Drifting in and out of consciousness, the victim mustered the strength to push Pe away. The victim then went to the toilet to wash himself, disgusted with what had happened, the prosecution continued. 

 

The victim later called a friend and confided that Pe had "raped" him. The victim called the police on Aug 9, at about 5.47am, stating: "A guy just tried to rape me. I have known him for a few weeks, he was very intoxicated. He is at home right now." 

 

Pe was arrested at his apartment at about 10.30am. 

 

The prosecution will lead evidence from analysts from the Health Sciences Authority to show that while the victim's blood sample contained 40 mg of ethanol per 100 ml of blood, no ethanol was detected in Pe's blood sample when it was taken. 

 

An Institute of Mental Health consultant will give evidence that the victim was likely to have been intoxicated between 4.15am and 5.30am on Aug 9, and was therefore unable to consent to the sexual acts. 

 

A psychiatrist will testify that she diagnosed the victim with generalised anxiety disorder with possible post-traumatic stress symptoms following the incident. 

 

The victim testified in camera on Wednesday. The prosecution will lead evidence from 26 witnesses in total. 

 

Pe is represented by lawyer Amarjit Singh. The trial continues on Wednesday afternoon. 

If convicted of sexual assault by penetration, Pe may be jailed for up to 20 years and fined or caned. 

 

Source: CNA/wt(gr)
 
 
Edited by GachiMuchi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Guest

Sometime gay have too much time 

If u notice many have too much time they go Safra toa payoh cruising or some are too lonely and bore they go mrt toliet or public pool or lucky Chinatown toliet exposing their cock to attract attention.Maybe the new generation gay must come out something for  old gay to occupy their time.Like organizing tour group to other country  by celebrity Gachi  .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reminds me of a thread in this forum earlier about someone asking whether it's normal for friend to let his bulge touch you. 

 

And majority of gays forum say its normal.... 

 

Its because of things like that people think it's okay to anyhow.. 

 

But this case jialat. Got sexual penetration one... Would you fuck a drunk person? Even if he is gay, and loves you. He can still report you rape him le. 

 

Some more on floor some more.. Knee hurt from trying to angle the cock in hor..... 

 

Gays are kinda sick and perverted. Because that how the gahmen want us to be. No real meaningful relationship. It just boils down to carnal gay sexual needs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Guest

I heard from china they organise  for older gay money boys  in private to satisfy their needs or urge.Willing party than u are safe.U screw someone drunken than u in trouble jail for 20 years.Even if u are rich  u can't enjoy yr money .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest 冰凉凉

Can't wait after convuction to.see the Rapist face splashed out on all newspaper, shinmin, zaobao, Berita , Tamil post. 

 

 

Must show so that everyone can keep ourselves safe from rape after come out from jail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Guest Yuck said:

Reminds me of a thread in this forum earlier about someone asking whether it's normal for friend to let his bulge touch you. 

 

And majority of gays forum say its normal.... 

 

Its because of things like that people think it's okay to anyhow....

There are other sensible, mature BW posts that emphasise responsible actions, not thinking with small head only.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
Guest Follow  up
On 4/19/2023 at 4:20 AM, GachiMuchi said:

Man on trial for sexually assaulting younger man who lay on his floor drunk

Jeffrey Pe took advantage of the fact that the younger man had just broken up with his girlfriend, and was looking to meet other women, said the prosecution. 

Man on trial for sexually assaulting younger man who lay on his floor drunk

A man holding an alcoholic beverage. (Photo: iStock)

21 Sep 2022 02:10PM(Updated: 21 Sep 2022 02:10PM)
 

SINGAPORE: The trial for a man accused of sexually assaulting a man half his age and fresh out of national service opened on Wednesday (Sep 21), with the prosecution charging that the older man had exploited the alleged victim's  trusting nature. 

 

Jeffrey Pe, a 45-year-old Singaporean, faces three charges of sexually penetrating the victim, then aged 20, as he lay inebriated on the floor of Pe's flat on Aug 9, 2017. 

 

The victim cannot be named due to a gag order protecting his identity. 

 

Opening its case on Wednesday, Deputy Public Prosecutors David Khoo and Tay Jia En said that Pe had sexually assaulted the victim when he was at his most vulnerable. 

 

"The accused had learnt that the victim had recently broken up with his girlfriend and was therefore looking to meet new people (girls in particular). 

 

"The accused thereafter gained the victim’s trust by showing that he was a sociable and extroverted person who could introduce the victim to people to expand the victim’s social network," said the prosecution. 

 

However, at a night out to celebrate the victim's completion of his full-time national service, Pe allegedly sexually assaulted the victim. 

 

"Every Singaporean son will fondly remember his Operationally Ready Date, where he is formally released from full-time National Service duties.

 

"Alas, not so for the then 20-year-old victim. Instead of fond memories, the victim is instead left with indelible scars of National Day 2017, and he had to seek professional help to overcome the trauma he received from the incident," said the prosecution. 

 

According to the prosecution, Pe and the victim first met at a pub around Jul 23, 2017. 

 

At the time, the victim had just broken up with his girlfriend and wanted to know more women. He befriended Pe who appeared connected with a woman he was interested in.

 

The two exchanged numbers after Pe invited both the victim and the woman to his birthday party on Jul 29, 2017. They conversed over WhatsApp in the meantime. 

 

Pe met the victim at a bar on Jul 30 to celebrate the former's birthday.  

 

On Aug 6, 2017, the victim allegedly wanted to meet Pe to drink, but the older man fell asleep before they could meet. Pe apologised and both agreed to meet two days later for drinks. 

 

On Aug 8, the victim met Pe at night and they consumed alcoholic drinks in the Chinatown area before the victim allegedly asked to sleep at Pe's residence. 

 

The prosecution said it would lead evidence to show that on Aug 9, Pe made the victim an alcoholic drink and offered the younger man a change of clothes and his bed to sleep in. The victim allegedly declined the clothes and the bed, falling asleep on the floor of Pe's bedroom in his own clothing. 

 

He awoke sometime later to find that his jeans and underwear had been pulled down, and Pe was sexually assaulting him, the prosecution alleged. 

 

Drifting in and out of consciousness, the victim mustered the strength to push Pe away. The victim then went to the toilet to wash himself, disgusted with what had happened, the prosecution continued. 

 

The victim later called a friend and confided that Pe had "raped" him. The victim called the police on Aug 9, at about 5.47am, stating: "A guy just tried to rape me. I have known him for a few weeks, he was very intoxicated. He is at home right now." 

 

Pe was arrested at his apartment at about 10.30am. 

 

The prosecution will lead evidence from analysts from the Health Sciences Authority to show that while the victim's blood sample contained 40 mg of ethanol per 100 ml of blood, no ethanol was detected in Pe's blood sample when it was taken. 

 

An Institute of Mental Health consultant will give evidence that the victim was likely to have been intoxicated between 4.15am and 5.30am on Aug 9, and was therefore unable to consent to the sexual acts. 

 

A psychiatrist will testify that she diagnosed the victim with generalised anxiety disorder with possible post-traumatic stress symptoms following the incident. 

 

The victim testified in camera on Wednesday. The prosecution will lead evidence from 26 witnesses in total. 

 

Pe is represented by lawyer Amarjit Singh. The trial continues on Wednesday afternoon. 

If convicted of sexual assault by penetration, Pe may be jailed for up to 20 years and fined or caned. 

 

Source: CNA/wt(gr)
 
 

 

 

Man gets jail, caning for sexually assaulting drunken male friend after night of drinking

 

Jeffrey Pe was found guilty in April on three counts of sexual assault by penetration. ST PHOTO: KUA CHEE SIONG
selinalum.png?VersionId=_t9hteGdlxa2hdP_L2v6mJbqweJQnA.x
Selina Lum
Senior Law Correspondent
UPDATED
 
2 HOURS AGO

SINGAPORE - After a night of pub-crawling with a 20-year-old man he befriended only weeks earlier, a 40-year-old man agreed to let the younger man “crash”, or sleep, at his place.

 

But after the younger man fell asleep on the floor of his bedroom, Jeffrey Pe sexually assaulted his intoxicated friend.

 

The victim had to push him off to get away.

 

On Monday, Pe, now 45, was sentenced to 10 years’ jail and 12 strokes of the cane by the High Court. He was found guilty in April on three counts of sexual assault by penetration.

 

 

Pe had contested the charges in a trial that began in September 2022, denying some of the acts and contending that the victim had consented to the other acts.

 

He claimed that the victim was open to exploring his sexuality and was romantically interested in him.

 

But Justice Mavis Chionh rejected his defence. She found that the victim was intoxicated after a night of drinking and incapable of consenting to the sexual acts performed on him by Pe.

 

The judge found that Pe was a disingenuous witness whose claims were not borne out by objective evidence.

 

 

On the other hand, she found the younger man’s testimony to be unusually convincing. She also noted his state of emotional distress from the audio recordings of the calls he made to the police after the assault.

 

In sentencing on Monday, Justice Chionh said an aggravating factor in the case was the harm caused to the victim, who was diagnosed with generalised anxiety disorder with possible post-traumatic stress symptoms. 

 

The two men first met at a pub on July 23, 2017.

 

The victim, who had just broken up with his long-time girlfriend, was interested in a woman at the pub and decided to befriend Pe, who appeared to be connected to her.

 

Pe invited the victim to his birthday party on July 29, 2017, and the duo exchanged mobile phone numbers.

 

Both began to chat on WhatsApp, talking about women and about Pe’s upcoming party.

 

On the day of the party, the victim brought a few of his friends along but had minimal interaction with Pe.

 

In the early hours of Aug 6, 2017, Pe invited the victim to his home for drinks, but the meeting fell through.

 

The duo subsequently met on Aug 8, 2017 for a night of drinks. When the victim asked Pe whether he could “crash” at the accused’s place, the older man agreed.

 

There, Pe gave the younger man an alcoholic drink, and the victim fell asleep on the floor of the bedroom in his own clothes.

 

He woke up sometime later to find the accused performing oral sex on him. As the victim drifted in and out of consciousness, Pe continued to sexually assault him.

 

After he pushed Pe away, the victim washed himself in the toilet, as he felt disgusted with what the accused had done to him. He then left the unit and called a friend, who advised him to call the police.

 

Pe is appealing against his conviction and sentence and is out on $80,000 bail.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The article doesn't say anything about gay or so, but reading from the context, why should the teacher give him alcohol at his place...

 

Former teacher gets jail for showing pornography to student, suggested sexual methods to 'destress'

The teacher invited the boy to his home, where he asked him sexual questions and plied him with alcohol.

 

07 Jul 2023

 

SINGAPORE: A former teacher from a top school in Singapore was sentenced to 54 days' jail on Friday (Jul 7) for showing pornographic material to a teenage student.

 

The teen, who was 17 at the time, had been thinking of skipping school as he felt ostracised and felt he had no purpose in life, so his mother had reached out to the offender for help.

 

The 49-year-old man, whose identity is under gag order along with details of the school and the subject he taught, had pleaded guilty to one count of showing sexual material to the teen. 

 

A second charge of possessing over 1,000 obscene video files was taken into consideration.

 

At the time of the offence, the man had been teaching for more than 22 years.

 

The victim was in year 6, the equivalent of junior college year 2. The offender was the boy's form teacher since 2020.

 

In January 2021, the victim's mother emailed the teacher, seeking help for her son as she wanted to find out how he was doing in school.

 

The teacher told the teen's mother that he had noticed the boy was very withdrawn, less cheerful, tired and falling behind on schoolwork. They agreed for the teacher to find a chance to speak to the victim.

 

When the teacher spoke to the boy after class, the teen confided that he had been having negative thoughts and engaged in self-harm to cope with his emotions.

 

The man then gave his phone number to the victim, suggesting that it be saved under a different name as their conversation was "not exactly legit".

 

The boy went home and told his mother what happened, expressing surprise and gratitude that an adult man could understand him so well.

 

The teacher began texting the boy. At the same time, he lied to the boy's mother that he had obtained the green light from the school to handle the boy on his own.

 

In February 2021, the teacher led the boy to a consultation area in the school and gave him a self-help book. They began talking and discussing coping mechanisms for emotions.

 

The teacher told the victim that males of his age had only two ways to destress - "medication and masturbation". This made the boy uncomfortable.

 

The teacher then began asking the boy sexual questions and showed him some links to pornographic websites.

 

He invited the boy to his flat a few days later, where he talked to the boy about watching porn and his experience visiting sex workers while on holiday in Bali. 

 

Neither the victim nor the accused had told the victim's parents about this meeting.

 

The teacher kept plying the teen with alcohol, continued to ask him sexual questions and showed him pornographic videos. The boy tried to avoid watching them, and the teacher noticed his discomfort.

 

When the teen wanted to leave, the teacher only booked a ride home for him about an hour later as he wanted the smell of alcohol to dissipate first.

 

The boy said that when he got home, he realised that "there was some immorality" in the teacher's behaviour.

 

He told his mother about it the next day. The matter was escalated to school authorities and the vice-principal filed a police report. The teacher resigned that same month.

 

After his arrest, he said he had reached out to the victim out of genuine concern for the boy's well-being. However, he said he also felt depressed and "starved of companionship", and thus crossed boundaries.

 

He was assessed at the Institute of Mental Health and found to have major depressive disorder, benzodiazepine use disorder and some personality disorder traits. However, these conditions had no causal link with his offences, and he was fit to plead in court.

 

SENTENCING SUBMISSIONS

The prosecutor had sought three months' jail, noting that the offence was relatively new, with no direct precedents to refer to.

 

Instead, the prosecution referred to precedents for similar offences such as sexual exploitation of a child or young person or exhibiting obscene objects to minors.

 

Deputy Public Prosecutor Yvonne Poon said the accused was the victim's form teacher and had abused this formal position of trust.

 

On top of this, he further cultivated a personal relationship of reliance and independence between himself and the victim, making an effort to gain the latter's trust.

 

The man already knew that the victim was in a position of acute vulnerability but went on to commit the offence "with nary an iota of consideration for the sort of havoc he might wreak upon the victim's mental and emotional states through such exploitation", said Ms Poon.

 

The teacher was also a "corrupting influence", encouraging the teen to perform sexual acts, getting him to drink alcohol while underaged and touching the boy inappropriately.

 

However, she accepted the mitigation that the man has no prior convictions and has a generally unblemished and extended career as an educator, who genuinely cared for his students' welfare.

 

The man had also been struggling with depression for almost 10 years.

 

The judge allowed the man to begin his jail term on Jul 17.

 

For making a teenager view pornographic material while he was in an exploitative relationship, the man could have been jailed for up to a year, fined, or both.

 

 

 

Edited by singalion
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

S'porean taxi driver, 60, groped & molested boy, 14, even though he said 'no'!!!

 

He was sentenced to 11 months' jail on 17 July 2023 - Monday.

 

A male taxi driver came onto his 14-year-old passenger, first touching the boy then molesting  and groping him, despite the latter rejecting his advances.

 

The 14 year old victim has a boyfriend of the same age when both of them boarded the taxi.

 

The molestation took place after the victim's boyfriend alighted at his destination.

 

https://mothership.sg/2023/07/taxi-driver-molest-boy/

Edited by FunLoving
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • FunLoving changed the title to Singaporean taxi driver molest 14yo male passenger!!
1 minute ago, Guest Guest said:

14 year old boy got 14 year old boyfriend....kids nowadays 😱

 

all thanks to the IT access & social media

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Guest
18 minutes ago, DonsonKwa said:

all thanks to the IT access & social media

 

I think if I even had a girlfriend at 14 years old last time, my parents will kick me out of the house.

 

And if I tell them I have a boyfriend at 14 years old, either I'd die in their hands, or they both die of heart attacks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...